首页 > 文章 > 时政 > 时代观察

美官方数据证实诺奖联名信伪造疫情

直言了 · 2016-07-09 · 来源:“转基因观察”微信公众号
转基因主粮 收藏( 评论() 字体: / /

  由罗伯兹发动的诺奖者联名信为推销黄金大米而陈述了维生素A缺乏症疫情,说:The World Health Organization estimates that 250 million people, suffer from VAD, including 40 percent of the children under five in the developing world. Based on UNICEF statistics, a total of one to two million preventable deaths occur annually as a result of VAD, because it compromises the immune system, putting babies and children at great risk. VAD itself is the leading cause of childhood blindness globally affecting 250,000 - 500,000 children each year. Half die within 12 months of losing their eyesight. (摘录完)。

  罗伯兹做法跟其他挺转帮做法一样,不给数据来源连接。不管他怎么做,美国卫生部发布文章数据说明维生素A缺乏症比例明显下降(没用黄金大米),证实罗伯兹是伪造数据和伪造疫情。该原文摘录如下:

  Trends and mortality effects of vitamin A deficiency in children in 138 low-income and middle-income countries between 1991 and 2013:

  a pooled analysis of population-based surveys.

  Stevens GA1, ……。Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Sep;3(9):e528-36. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00039-X.

  URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275329

  Abstract:

  FINDINGS:

  In 1991, 39% (95% credible interval 27-52) of children aged 6-59 months in low-income and middle-income countries were vitamin A deficient. In 2013, the prevalence of deficiency was 29% (17-42; posterior probability [PP] of being a true decline=0?81).

  Vitamin A deficiency significantly declined in east and southeast Asia and Oceania from 42% (19-70) to 6% (1-16; PP>0?99); a decline in Latin America and the Caribbean from 21% (11-33) to 11% (4-23; PP=0?89) also occurred.

  In 2013, the prevalence of deficiency was highest in sub-Saharan Africa (48%; 25-75) and south Asia (44%; 13-79). 94?500 (54?200-146?800) deaths from diarrhoea and 11?200 (4300-20?500) deaths from measles were attributable to vitamin A deficiency in 2013, which accounted for 1?7% (1?0-2?6) of all deaths in children younger than 5 years in low-income and middle-income countries. More than 95% of these deaths occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia.

  INTERPRETATION:

  Vitamin A deficiency remains prevalent in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Deaths attributable to this deficiency have decreased over time worldwide, and have been almost eliminated in regions other than south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. This new evidence for both prevalence and absolute burden of vitamin A deficiency should be used to reconsider, and possibly revise, the list of priority countries for high-dose vitamin A supplementation such that a country's priority status takes into account both the prevalence of deficiency and the expected mortality benefits of supplementation.

  通过那文献可看到,有效防治维他命A的显著成绩并非来自转基因作物譬如转基因黄金大米,而是来自现有食品补剂。

  此外,联合国UNICEF及其引用的世卫组织数据也说明罗伯兹伪造疫情数据。譬如,联合国机构说的44%/48%疫情比例是集中在两个地区“the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa (48 per cent) and South Asia and South Asia (44 per cent)”的数字,见下:

  Two regions have achieved effective coverage with vitamin A supplements in 2014。

  Updated: Apr 2016。

  http://data.unicef.org/nutrition/vitamin-a.html

  Vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness and increases the risk of death from common childhood illnesses such as diarrhea. Periodic, high-dose vitamin A supplementation is a proven, low-cost intervention[1] which has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality by 12 to 24 per cent[2], and is therefore an important programme in support of efforts to reduce child mortality. The World Health Organization has classified vitamin A deficiency as a public health problem affecting about one third of children aged 6 to 59 months in 2013, with the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa (48 per cent) and South Asia and South Asia (44 per cent).

  As supplementation is a key child survival intervention, discussions of progress focus largely on coverage of that intervention. Despite the potential benefits, only 69 per cent of targeted children were reached in 2014. The good news is that integrated child health events have helped support high coverage of vitamin A supplementation in 2014 in a large number of least developed countries, where the need is often greatest.

  可罗伯兹搞的联名信却把两个局部数据扩大为整个发展中国家的整体数据。作为发展中国家,中国在防治维他命A缺乏症方面取得了显著成绩。就是说,为推销转基因黄金大米,罗伯兹用伪造疫情数据而对中国政府和中国人民搞造谣污蔑。

  说明:罗伯兹鼓动联名信所推销的转基因黄金大米,至今没有任何国家批准上市。罗伯兹所在国家不吃转基因黄金大米,而诺奖故乡瑞典则是拒绝转基因食品。若是好东西,他们自己为什么不吃甚至拒绝商业化上市呢?诚如有网民所说:若推销者不吃他们推销的东西,那就涉嫌欺骗。执政党说,群众的眼光是雪亮的。如此,别说百名诺奖者搞那签名可,就是全体签名、欺骗还是欺骗,最终也瞒不过人民。

  说明:学刊已经撤掉黄金大米论文,见下:

  Retractions.

  AJCN. First published ahead of print July 29, 2015 as doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.093229.

  http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/early/2015/07/29/ajcn.114.093229.full.pdf+html

  Retraction of Tang G, Hu Y, Yin S-a, Wang Y, Dallal GE, Grusak MA, and Russell RM. b-Carotene in Golden Rice is as good as b-carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:658–64.

  The article cited above, which was originally published in the September 2012 issue and prepublished on 1 August 2012, has been retracted by the publisher for the following reasons:

  1. The authors are unable to provide sufficient evidence that the study had been reviewed and approved by a local ethics committee in China in a manner fully consistent with NIH guidelines. Furthermore, the engaged institutions in China did not have US Federal Wide Assurances and had not registered their Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Review Committee).

  2. The authors are unable to substantiate through documentary evidence that all parents or children involved in the study were provided with the full consent form for the study.

  3. Specific eligibility issues were identified in regard to 2 subjects in the study.

  This retraction was prepublished online on 29 July 2015.

  以上故事再次说明,转基因食品及其商业推销充满了欺骗,就是诺奖获得者在金钱利益面前也搞伪造数据和欺骗活动。由此,不奇怪,美国一些媒体把那个联名信入选为“垃圾科学”。同时,就在那联名信在中国一些媒体大轰大嗡之际,在美国,关于转基因食品标识的地方州法规生效,意味着美国在淘汰转基因农业的道路上又迈进一步。这个进展说明,再来一万个诺奖签字也挽救不了转基因农业被淘汰的命运。

「 支持!」

 WYZXWK.COM

您的打赏将用于网站日常运行与维护。
帮助我们办好网站,宣传红色文化!

注:配图来自网络无版权标志图像,侵删!
声明:文章仅代表个人观点,不代表本站观点—— 责任编辑:红星

欢迎扫描下方二维码,订阅网刊微信公众号

收藏

心情表态

今日头条

最新专题

130周年

点击排行

  • 两日热点
  • 一周热点
  • 一月热点
  • 心情
  1. “深水区”背后的阶级较量,撕裂利益集团!
  2. 大萧条的时代特征:历史在重演
  3. 疯狂从老百姓口袋里掏钱,发现的时候已经怨声载道了!
  4. 央媒的反腐片的确“惊艳”,可有谁想看续集?
  5. 到底谁“封建”?
  6. 该来的还是来了,润美殖人被遣返,资产被没收,美吹群秒变美帝批判大会
  7. 两个草包经济学家:向松祚、许小年
  8. “中国人喜欢解放军吗?”国外社媒上的国人留言,差点给我看哭了
  9. 掩耳盗铃及其他
  10. 从历史工人运动到当下工人运动的谋略——(一)历史工人运动
  1. 到底谁不实事求是?——读《关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议》与《毛泽东年谱》有感
  2. 历史上不让老百姓说话的朝代,大多离灭亡就不远了
  3. 与否毛者的一段对话
  4. 孔庆东|做毛主席的好战士,敢于战斗,善于战斗——纪念131年韶山讲话
  5. “深水区”背后的阶级较量,撕裂利益集团!
  6. 大萧条的时代特征:历史在重演
  7. 社会乱糟糟的,老百姓只是活着
  8. 疯狂从老百姓口袋里掏钱,发现的时候已经怨声载道了!
  9. 央媒的反腐片的确“惊艳”,可有谁想看续集?
  10. 到底谁“封建”?
  1. 北京景山红歌会隆重纪念毛主席逝世48周年
  2. 元龙:不换思想就换人?贪官频出乱乾坤!
  3. 辽宁王忠新:必须直面“先富论”的“十大痛点”
  4. 刘教授的问题在哪
  5. 季羡林到底是什么样的人
  6. 历数阿萨德罪状,触目惊心!
  7. 十一届三中全会公报认为“颠倒历史”的“右倾翻案风”,是否存在?
  8. 欧洲金靴|《我是刑警》是一部纪录片
  9. 我们还等什么?
  10. 只有李先念有理由有资格这样发问!
  1. 毛主席扫黄,雷厉风行!北京所有妓院一夜彻底关闭!
  2. 剑云拨雾|韩国人民正在创造人类历史
  3. 到底谁不实事求是?——读《关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议》与《毛泽东年谱》有感
  4. 果断反击巴西意在震慑全球南方国家
  5. 重庆龙门浩寒风中的农民工:他们活该被剥削受冻、小心翼翼不好意思吗?
  6. 央媒的反腐片的确“惊艳”,可有谁想看续集?
Baidu
map