H1N1的惊天大骗局（2.0版）

H1N1惊天大骗局（2.0版） THE GREAT CHEAT OF H1N1 (2.0nd Edition)　　

1前传HISTORY 　　

1.1 美国与731的秘密交易The secret deal between US and 731　　

1.2 朝鲜战场上的细菌战  The bacteria war in Korea battlefield　　

1.3 美国的基因科学技术全球领先  Global leading is the American gene science & technology 　　

2 精心设局SET UP THE GREAT CHEAT VERY CAREFULLY　　

2.1 偷采血样Collected blood samples under the table　　

2.2 全球疫苗免疫联盟与儿童计划免疫程序 GAVI and SCIP  　　

2.3 李钟郁博士之死与陈冯富珍上任及世界卫生组织真相 The death of Dr.Li ZongYu and The appointment of Chen FengFuZen and The truth of WHO 　　

3 “猪源甲型（H1N1）流感病毒可能是人为制造”印尼卫生部长及吉布兹博士的分析 “ THE SWINE-ORIGIN INFLUENZA A(H1N1) VIRUS MAY PROBABLY BE A CREATION OF “MAN-MADE”,The analysises of Health Minister of Indonesia and Dr. Gibbs　　

3.1印尼卫生部长的分析The analysis of Health Minister of Indonesia　　

3.2 吉布兹博士的分析The analysis of Dr.Gibbs　　

3.2.1介绍和系统发育研究Introduction and Phylogenetic Studies 　　

3.2.2假定 Hypotheses  　　

3.2.3 旁证Circumstantial Evidence　　

3.2.4基因图案和序列标记Motifs and Sequence  Signatures 　　

    3.2.5结论Conclusion 　　

3.3 对吉布兹博士分析的分析The analysis of Dr. Gibbs’s analysis　　

3.4 对萨斯及禽流感的分析The analysis of SARS and avian influenza　　

4  美国正在实施这场针对中国的大骗局US ARE CARRYING OUT THE GREAT CHEAT TO CHINA　　

4.1世卫组织与“圣贤”（SAGE）“战略咨询专家小组” WHO and Strategic Advisory Group of  Experts　　

4.2  欧洲议会将调查世卫组织及“大流行病警报”丑闻 The European Parliament will investigate   WHO and “pandemic warning” scandal 　　

4.3  Leonard G. Horowitz博士的分析   The analysis of Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz　　

4.4  制备毒株”NYMCX-179A”来自美国  The strain “NYMCX-179A” from America　　

4.5  100天的甲流疫苗安全系数有多高？  How much safety factor does the H1N1 vaccines of 100 days in china have?　　

4.6 奥巴马赤膊上阵 The show of obama  　　

4.7 美国骗术成功US have cheaten China　　

5 美国完全有这个能力实施这场针对中国的大骗局THE ABOSOLUTELY US HAVE A CAPABILITY TO CARRY OUT THE GREAT CHEAT TO CHINA　　

5.1 HIV/AIDS系人造病毒 HIV/AIDS is a virus of “Man-Made”　　

5.1.1概述Overview   　　

5.1.2 时间、地点、人物、过程Time、Place、Person、Process　　

5.1.3 Dr. Gerald Myers(美国顶尖DNA序列分析家)的分析The analysis of Dr. Gerald Myers (the U.S. Government's chief DNA sequence analyst)　　

5.1.4 铁证如山The true evidence　　

5.2 完全有能力搞出更多更先进的病毒It fully have a capability to produce a more advanced virus　　

5.3 美国社会的上层结构The top structure of American society　　

5.4 综合以上Based on the above　　

6 中国为何不能识破这场针对中国的大骗局？WHY CHINA CANN’T SEE THROUGH THE GREAT CHEAT TO CHINA ？　　

6.1中国的内部及外部形势The interior and exterior situation of China　　

6.2中国官员及学术水平低下The low level are the Chinese officials and academic 　　

6.3实验设备差The poor laboratory equipments　　

6.4美国对中国影响,渗透The US try to influence & infiltrate China　　

6.5 Z**院士的言谈The speeches of academician “Z**”　　

6.6 还有一个理由 Another reason　　

 7 德国人及香港人如何应对甲流?HOW DO GERMAN AND HONGKONG PEOPLE REPLY TO INFLUENZA A?　　

8 结论CONCLUSION　　

9  甲流应对措施HOW CAN WE DO TO INFLUENZA A? 　　

  向网站编辑问好!

  首先我们绝不希望这一切发生！！但种种迹象表明这一切正在发生！！本文是一篇严肃文章，杜绝一切戏说，每一处都力求有根有据，希望读者诸君也认真地看此文章！！　　

欲了解此文，请诸位读者在看完此文情况下，最好再抽点时间看一下电影《卡桑德拉大桥》(THE CASSANDRA CROSSING)（ 1976由西德/意大利/英国拍摄）及美国欲灭中国的绝密K计划（第二版）（最好在 ，此网站有黑体字功能，可迅速抓住重点）。　　

在本文中，H1N1即甲流即猪流感，这三者指同一事物。　　

甲流疫情首发国墨西哥是美国的经济政治军事附庸国，美国要它往东，它不敢往西；世卫组织被“圣贤”（SAGE）“战略咨询专家小组”影响操纵，SAGE与各大制药公司有密缺关系，而各大制药公司又被犹太势力控制或有密缺关系。再综合印尼卫生部长苏帕莉吉及布兹博士分析，可得出结论：新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒是美国研究开发出来的人造实验室产物！欧盟官员称甲流疫情是世纪骗局 制药公司制造恐慌牟取暴利。欧洲理事会卫生委员会主席沃尔夫冈·沃达格对这场骗局已揭穿了一大半，但他认为设计制造这场骗局的目地仅仅是制造恐慌牟取暴利。我们分析这种可能性不大，如果只为钱，可通过股票增发等多种手段；这样作所得很少很少，而代价太大太大！！排除了为钱的目的，再结合其它国际经济政治军事意识形态大博弈的形势分析。那这场世纪骗局的目的就已经十分清晰明了，那就是彻底搞砸中国！！　　

请看天涯经济论坛经济杂谈2010-3月5日H1N1惊天大骗局中转贴图片惨不忍睹！！http://www.tianya.cn/publicforum/content/develop/1/386027.shtml

灭中国的H1N1惊天大骗 局

再请用百度搜索信息时报 张国录，可看见张国录的悲惨正面照片，南方都市报只给了侧面照。2009．11.27上午，广东揭西县河婆镇人张国录陪妻子阿香，因阿香脚肿，到深圳宝安区沙井人民医院，。因夫妻有亲戚在医院工作，亲戚出于好心，问夫妻要不要打疫苗，夫妻都打了疫苗。14个小时后,次日零时许，张国录开始发烧，一直烧至上午10点多，返回沙井人民医院，医生安排吃退烧药；11.29晚，再次发烧，臀部开始发痒，“冒出棉签头大的肉包，软软的”；12.5，他全身开始肿胀变形，“头肿大得，张大嘴巴都塞不禁牙刷”，眼睛肿成一条峰，看不见眼珠；12.9开始在沙井人民医院住院；12.12转入深圳人民医院，……；12.31，转院到广州中山医科大学附属第二医院，全身开始蜕皮，“皮屑有成人指甲大”，直褪了三周才褪完；“换”了皮的张国录皮肤黑红紧绷，摸上去就象木板……；治疗一段时间，张开始皮开肉绽，形成一片片鳞片……；2月2日，已无法下地行走；2月5日，高烧至40.5°C，此后需借助氧气管呼吸，全身紧绷不能动，一动就象刀割一样……。究竟何因，目前还未有结论。其妻目前无事。(南方都市报A13版,2月8日)此事为何拖延许久，才被报道出来？　　

近期有媒体报道，深圳一名中年男子接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗导致全身蜕皮。广东省卫生厅8日回应称，这名“蜕皮”患者已被诊断为别嘌呤醇超敏反应综合征，专家认为基本排除与接种甲流疫苗有关。新华网广州（02.08）能而标题却成了<广东称深圳患者蜕皮与接种甲流疫苗无关>。“基本排除”,高！实在是高！！人命关天的大事,来不得半点虚假,是就是,不是就不是,不要搞什么基本大概之类！！这背后隐藏着……?　　

综合以上，这种假定可能性有75%!!即美国真正目的，就是美国把新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒在全球传播，通过世界卫生组织（WHO）不断制造恐怖气氛，再通过掌握的媒体配合鼓吹，诱骗全世界的人都来打疫苗，做给中国人看。趁机在发往中国的毒株中做手脚，美国运往中国”NYMCX-179A” 毒株,实际上是类似于HIV这样,有12个月潜伏期的恶性病毒,对中国下毒手，结合其它手段，引爆房地产经济政治军事危机，让这些危机总爆发，让中国灭种亡国！！写到这里，真希望这一切都只是一种设假设假设，可种种迹象表明,再用你的逻辑思维想一想, 这一切不能说100%,但至少有75%可能性!!而中国计划3.9亿人接种疫苗，如果这个计划实现，那么中国将彻底亡国灭种！！而目前（2010.03.01），中国已有8000万人接种疫苗，其中还有参加国庆阅兵解放军，武警，其它解放军……。写到这里，肝肠寸断，欲哭无泪，肝肠寸断，欲哭无泪，祖国在危机中！！ 即使只有30~40%可能性，这也是一件天大的事情，国家有关部门也应该立即组织中国未被人影响收买、技术最好的专家学者对此进行彻底调查！！　　

现在回过头来看，一切都那么清晰、明了。2003春，爆发伊拉克战争的同时，在中国香港、广东爆发了萨斯（Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromes），搞得人心惶惶；后来又发生了禽流感，搞得也挺恐慌的。这很有可能就是美国搞的一次火力侦察。借此机会，摸清了中国的学术、医疗水平及疫病防控决策执行监控机构、流程、人员，以便为这一次针对中国的世纪大骗局做好周密准备。美国上层熟知“知己知彼，百战不殆”这条战争规律，中国对美国的又有多少了解？2003萨斯之后的几年内，方舟子撰文《如何看待中药的毒性》、《谁说中医不是骗人的？》、《就这样慢慢被毒死》，希望彻底否定中医中药，中医中药自身也存在问题，但他打着科学的旗号，意图将中医中药一棍子打死。当疫情来临时，意图让他人选择疫苗，而非中药。这背后隐藏着……?

立即暂停注射疫苗，国家有关部门立即组织中国未被人影响收买、技术最好的专家学者对此进行彻底调查，只要将中国产疫苗与美国本土产疫苗做一对比实验，作基因对比测序（中国有这个技术能力可能性不大）。若无基因测序能力，可采取动物大剂量实验（向鼠狗最好是猴等注射大剂量疫苗）真相将大白于天下！！！

1前传　　

1.1 美国与731的秘密交易　　

 二战后，为了独占日本731部队的生物战资料，美国占领当局地与石井四郎等日军战犯进行交易，以赦免和保护731部队人员为条件换取日本细菌战犯为美国军方服务。美国由此从关东军第731部队获得细菌武器的研究资料，故而对发展生化武器大感兴趣。　　

在第二次世界大战过程中，日本组建了世界上规模最大的细菌部队，其中包括“满洲第731部队和满洲第101部队，南京1644部队和广州8604部队等。这些带有番号的特殊秘密部队，其任务是把生物学和医学转用于武器生产、研制、试验和生产各种极具杀伤力的细菌，并将其用于实际战争中。　　

其实，美国对日本细菌战关注已久，早就对此情况掌握了部分确凿的情报，只是出于种种顾虑和后来想独吞珍贵的细菌战资料的目的而一直未敢公布。早在1939年，日本东京陆军军医学校的助理教授内藤良一就曾访问设在纽约的洛克菲勒研究所，（一个多么熟悉的名字！）并在该研究所中搜集了有关黄热病病毒的资料。后来内藤良一以三千美元收买该所职员来盗取疫苗，从而引起了美国陆军参谋部二部的关注。当时研究所的包尔博士将有关情报汇报至陆军部军医总监赛门上校，使美国对此有所警觉。随着二次世界大战规模的发展，美国又逐渐从全球各个位置获知了相关情况，逐渐证实了日军在进行细菌战的可能性和确凿性。　　

1942年4月11日，驻重庆的美国大使向美国国务卿报告中国政府的控诉，即中国外交部和保健部谴责日军于1940年10月27日于宁波使用鼠疫作战，并在1941年11月4日又在常德故计重施。1943年起，由于南京战事激烈，因此部分屯驻在满洲的部队也被派往南洋地区作战，其中部分与细菌战相关的部队被美军俘获，从而泄露出日军拥有细菌作战部队的事实。1943年发行的名为《细菌战的真实》的手册，此事使美国确认日军有实施细菌战的能力。到1944年5月，美军终于掌握了日军使用细菌战的决定性证据。在太平洋地区统和情报中心第8438号文件中，曾引用获自日军俘虏的细菌炸弹教育手册两本，证实了日军制造及使用武器的事实。其后，美军更陆续从俘虏的军医和卫生兵中得知细菌战的资料。　　

基于对日军细菌战资料的独占心理，美国在战后立即派出了以麻省理工学院院长为首的科学调查团前往日本本土调查，其中派出了美国生物战研究中心的桑德中校，并交付其主要任务是调查日军生物战的实况。在1945年9月20日至11月10日之间，桑德斯访问的对象包括日本陆相下村定，参谋总长梅津美治郎，陆军省医务局局长神林浩以及细菌战部队机关人员增田知员，内藤良一和井上隆朝等22人，其后作成《桑德斯报告》，呈报当局。当桑德斯中校在调查时，通过当时日方翻译内藤良一（即1939年洛克非勒事件当事人）了解到了，日方欲以资料换取免除罪责。　　

当美军获知石井潜返日本后，便用了五个月的时间与之联系，陆续找到了石井四郎及731部队的部队联络人员，双方在镰仓市的高级旅店中展开谈判——既镰仓会议。在会议中，石井就提出以资料作为他们免除战犯罪责的交换条件，桑德斯随即让调查团负责人麻省理工学院院长康福顿向五角大楼转述。与此同时，他又与麦克阿瑟，当时的盟军司令官商议，决定免除、生物战部队相关者的战犯身份，以换取进一步的情报。负责调查石井四郎和731部队的美国第二参谋部为单独抢先于苏联得到日本细菌部队最新研究成果，决定采取许诺免究石井四郎等人战犯罪责的方针。　　

当汤普逊与石井四郎深入交涉完细菌战部队的编制以及训练作战生产力后美国意识到“日本的细菌战经验，对美国的细菌战研究计划和国家的安全保障具有重要价值，远比用它追究石井等人的战犯罪更为重要”。于是美国政府做出决定要保守这些秘密，企图以免罪来独占。这时对细菌战资料独占便转为美国政府的行为。　　

为保守此秘密不为外人所知，1947年1月24日，美国国防部联合参谋部发布了“WX95147”号训令指示麦克阿瑟：凡可能对美国安全带来危险的情报，或可能伤及“美国与友好国家之间关系”的情报及科学研究等，均需事先照会并获得联合参谋本部的同意，必要时上需照会并获得“国务院，陆军，海军三部统合委员会”的同意，才得以公布或提供情报，与此同时，美国已将细菌专家派往了日本。可以看出此项训令的目的，就是要保守731部队的秘密。　　

而石井四郎为作为换取本人及其部下3000人的生命安全的条件，将其在研制细菌武器时，以3000人（其中有中国人，蒙古人，朝鲜人，英国人，美国人和苏联人）活体实验观察记录和在中国战场，后方实施细菌战，屠杀中国军民，破坏农牧业生产的经验，总结成四篇文章。这四篇文章是：一、由19人编写，长达60页的“用或人细菌武器的试验报告等书”；二、长达20页的“对摧毁农作物的细菌战研究 ”；三、由10人编写的“关于对牲畜进行细菌战的研究”；四、石井本人写的“20年来对细菌战的全面研究总结性文章”；还附有8000张有关用细菌武器作活人试验和活人解剖的病理和幻灯片。　　

为了独占情报，由美军细菌战研究中心的细菌战专家汤母森出面做出调查报告称：“关于发展进攻性的细菌战，731部队的有些东西是值得注意的，但是日本还绝对不能够把细菌武器实用化。”从此来贬低731部队的细菌战能力，甚至还否认了有细菌战其事，以避免人们的重视和追究。然而，此事是难以避免被世人所知，苏联方面进入东北后就已初步掌握了731部队的有关情况。1947年1月9日，远东军事法庭苏联副首席检查官维西里耶夫少将，便开始透过国际检查局调查部向美国要求提讯以下诸人：日军石井军医中将–防疫给水部第731部队队长；日军菊地齐少将–防疫给水部第731部队第一部部长；日军太田大佐–防疫给水部第731部队第四部部长；他并要求美方把供前第731部队村上朝隆中佐和该部队总务部部长中留金藏的地址。到此时，美国发觉苏联的情报工作相当详密，于是美国使用了双面剑，一方面借此良机胁迫石井等人提供更多的细菌战实验成果，另一方面，华盛顿方面由统合参谋本部至麦克阿瑟以密电提出：“第一部分，苏联审问石井将军，菊地，太田大佐有关细菌战，必需在总司令部最高长官的监督下执行，且惟有在以下条件之前方被许可……”；“A，苏联在进行讯问之前，菊地，太田大佐要先接受美国要员的调查，为了协助阁下，已尽速准备派遣陆军部特别训练代表，令其担当美国先行讯问之任务，并监视紧接着将举行的苏联的讯问……”；“B，在先行讯问中，若有认为不宜让苏联知道的重要情报，应指示菊地，太田，不得泄露该情报予苏联”；“C，在苏联进行面对面的讯问之前，应明白告知日本的细菌战专家，不得说出美国以先行接见调查之事。”此举当然引起苏联等国的不满，美苏两国几乎为了石井等人一事导致决裂，由于美国蓄意阻挠，结果苏联无法引渡石井等人。　　

战后国际审判机构中，美国方面首先注意到日本生化部队的是，隶属远东国际军事裁判所国际检查局的美国检查官莫罗上校。他于1945年12月16日以美国检查团人员的身份赴日，同年8月国际检查局成立之后，莫罗即开始进行调查。为搜寻日军从事细菌毒气战的资料与证据，远赴上海，重庆，北平，南京等各地考察。当他回到东京的住所之后，即根据中国政府提供的正式报告，作出12页的“莫罗报告书”。3月2日，莫罗向首席检查官基南提出这份题为“中日战争备忘录”的报告书，并要求国际检查局讯问石井四郎。同时，莫罗又以中国政府提供的资料写成“ 中国手册––1937––43”，控诉日军实施生化战的罪行。而此时美国陆军部已与石井达成协议，为获取珍贵的细菌战资料，准备不惜掩盖日本生物战部队的犯罪事实，于是1946年3月初，当国际检查局向当时拘禁石井的盟军司令部参谋二部要求提讯石井时，遭到盟总的严词拒绝。当莫罗的要求被拒绝以后，再次到中国调查，1946年3月2日，莫罗再次与中国检查官向哲睿，秘书路易亨利陈及美国法务官沙顿，离开东京到上海作进一步调查，并于4月2日向东京审判的首席检查官基南提交了“中国旅行报告”的备录。在有关细菌毒气战方面，莫罗是根据国民政府军政部防毒处处长杨昌凯少将所提供的资料，报告日军以毒气使中国军死伤36963人的详细情形。但是，由于美国已与基南取得默契，结果这些资料均被首席检查官基南隐匿，结果，日军此项罪行并未公开审判。　　

石井等人为了求得逃避惩罚，极力向美国炫耀自己的资料有多珍贵，有多大的利用价值，以此来引诱美国的贪欲，他们提出，美方如欲获取资料，就不许以口头协议代替书面协议，保证不再追究他们及其下属的战犯罪责，石井一再声称他们是“具有高水准的理论基础和产业知识的研究者。”他们的研究中有几项是“针对远东地理条件”“针对寒带地区所使用”的生物战研究。以上诱惑，极大刺激了美方的胃口，麦克阿瑟当即于1947年5月6日以“C52423号电”向陆军部请示，强调了石井资料的重要性，希望华盛顿陆军部能接受石井的要求。美国国务院一方面于1947年12月8日以“极密电”回复麦克阿瑟，决定将用谍报管道隐藏石井情报，从而保障其免于战争罪责。另一方面于同年9月份派出底特里克堡研究所的二名细菌专家——维克特和溪尔到日本评估石井所提供资料的价值，从而进一步对日本生化部队的实情加以了解。同年12月12日，二人向美国陆军化学战军团魏特将军作以报告，强调日方资料之重要，认为日方资料“由于关系到人体实验，是我们自己的实验室有所顾及而不能得来的。”而且“这些资料的获取，只支出25万日圆（约合当时美圆700元）的微小数目，跟实际研究的花费相比真是太便宜了。” 美方在了解资料的价值之后，国务院既以“SFE188-1”号电文确定了美方的独占政策。在电文中阐释美方“严禁将石井等人的细菌战情报用为追究战争的证据。”彻底表明了美方的态度。 　　

美方首先利用日本生化战人员发展细菌战研究，于1946年5月在日本相模的大野为基地建立了细菌战部队––第406部队（一说496部队）。其原名为“美国陆军在日医疗本部第406医学研究所”，其表面任务是提供各医疗部队的“捐血”业务，但事实上却是准备使用生化武器，在其设在崎玉县草加郡的制造工厂内开始使用原731部队的队员，由其操作从事制造工作。 　　

当美国获取731部队的资料后，“对从事生化战的信心大增”，美国政府正式发布标题为“生化武器应较原子武器更受重视”的报告。而且美方于1947年再次拒绝在“日内瓦议定书”上签字，并“严格管制有关武器的报道”。由此可见，美国确实从关东军第731部队获得细菌武器的研究资料，故而对发展生化武器大感兴趣甚至因此对称霸世界亦大有信心。 　　

在美方免除731部队人员罪责后，731部队开始与美军合作。731部队战时在中国大陆建立了多达40多个分部，从业人员达10045人。但这些并不包括日本国内的协助机构。当日本在大陆的根基全毁以后，在日本本土的组织则相当完整。为保全现有职位，以及救助由大陆逃回的医疗同事，日军生化战相关人员开始设法与美军合作。1952年3月，美国当局下令免除约1000名军医的罪责，使得“医疗战犯”完全不存在。至此，免除战犯罪责的731部队队员更进一步利用生化战技术和知识，担任医学界重要职位，例如：曾任满洲医科大学校长，731部队长之职的北野政次，战后曾任“大实验治疗研究所所长，中村龙制药公共卫生研究所所长，绿十字血液研究所长，南极特别委员会医学部门委员，绿十字最高顾问等职，川岛清，731部队总务部长，战后为八街少年院医师，早川清，731部队第三研究员，战后任早川预防卫生研究所所长…… 。石井四郎先是失踪，后来公然主持美国在日本设立的细菌战研究机构，1959年在东京死于喉癌。731部队的细菌战犯绝大部分在日本，他们逃脱了审判，甚至在1981年9月5日，731部队战友会在日本倍卅美愿宾馆堂而皇之地召开第一次全国大会，并决定要为已死的石井四郎建“公德”碑！这1000名军医及其后代在当前的日本医药卫生界拥有多大影响力？世界卫生组织副干事长福田敬二是否属于这股势力？　　

很清楚，为了独占731部队关于细菌战、生物战的所谓“技术成果”，美国政府和美国军方毫不犹豫地与反人类罪的罪犯和谐共舞。善良的中国人总是奇怪，日本为什么总是对侵略战争不肯认账，根源就在于二战后美国占领当局向日本传达了明确的清晰的信号：只要能够为美国利益服务，对美国利益有使用价值，731部队的反人类战犯都可以成为美国的朋友，与美国进行讨价还价的交易。没有什么正义与邪恶，只有对美国的实用价值！　　

时至今日 ，美国政府和美国军方从来没有为包庇日本细菌战犯而有过丝毫反省，也从来没有放弃细菌战、生物战的研究，面对这样的历史和现实，有谁敢拍着胸脯向“我家大门常打开”的中国人民保证，美国绝对没有开展针对中国的基因武器进行研究的意愿和能力？从美国对待日本731部队细菌战犯的态度上，相信读者会做出自己的判断。　　

我们为慎重起见，特意拜访深圳华大基因研究院某资深人士（60年代毕业于北京大学），认为美国有能力,但不敢样这作, 认为样这作将违背人类道德底线!!! 我们只能说他对美国这个国家,对犹太人太不了解,真是太善良,太天真……,或已被美国……?这里我们简单回顾一下美国与731部队的肮脏交易，就可以大致了解到美国是否具有研究和使用基因武器的动机与胆量了。在五角大楼眼里，从来就没有“冒天下之大不韪”这七个字!!!从美国其后在朝鲜战争中使用细菌战，更验证了美国的险恶用心。　　

　 1.2 朝鲜战场上的细菌战　　

　　在朝鲜战争中，美国对我志愿军战士和朝鲜人民军，动用了细菌武器。　　

　　1952年初，为搜集有关美国在朝鲜及中国东北实施细菌战的证据，中国成立了一个70多人的调查委员会，成员包括中国红十字总会、各人民团体、各民主党派、工学商界的代表以及昆虫学、细菌学、寄生虫学、病毒学、病理学、临床医学、流行病学、公共卫生学、化学、生物学及兽医学专家，前往朝鲜战场和我国东北地区进行调查。　　

　　1952年3月3日至19日，由国际知名的法学家组成的“国际民主法律工协会调查团”也前往朝鲜和中国东北地区进行了现场调查。同年6月23日至8月6日，由瑞典、法国、英国、意大利、巴西、苏联、中国等国家的著名科学家组成的“调查在朝鲜和中国的细菌战事实国际科学委员会”(简称国际科学委员会)，由剑桥大学教授李约瑟先生率领，赶赴朝鲜和我国东北地区进行实地调查。所有的调查都证实了美国在朝鲜和我国东北地区使用生物武器的事实。国际科学委员会提交的报告《国际科学委员会调查在朝鲜和中国的细菌战事实报告书》(通常称李约瑟报告)得出的结论是：“朝鲜及中国东北的人民，确已成为细菌武器的攻击目标；美国军队以许多不同的方法使用了这些细菌武器，其中有一些方法，看起来是把日军在第二次世界大战期间进行细菌战所使用的方法加以发展而成的”。此外，加拿大传教士詹姆士·艾迪科特先生(中文名文幼章)在辽宁省沈阳市附近地区进行调查后，于1952年4月25日在伦敦的一次新闻发布会上说，美国在中国使用过细菌武器。 　　

　　中国和朝鲜还掌握了其他一些确凿的证据。比如，曾参与对中朝两国进行细菌战、后来被俘虏的美国飞行员的供词。他们供认曾经使用过细菌武器。其中一些高级军官甚至谈到过美国参谋长联席会议决策在朝鲜实施细菌战的过程。这些军官包括美国空军第4战斗截击机飞行大队大队长瓦克·马胡林上校、美国空军第49战斗轰炸机联队副联队长安德鲁·埃文斯上校、美国海军陆战队第一航空兵联队参谋长弗兰克·许威布尔上校。 　　

　　但是，美方拒不承认细菌战调查，对上述证据一概不予理会。1953年10月26日，美国驻联合国副代表查尔斯·梅奥在联合国的一次会议上说：“所谓的‘细菌战’供述不仅仅是共产分子灵机一动的聪明主意，更是大量的有计划的谎言的不可分割的一部分。” 　　

1.3 美国的基因科学技术全球领先                                      　　

  二战后, 美国主要是出于军事目地，投入大量资源在生物基因方面研究开发，特别是在1962-1978年启动了一个《Special Virus Cancer Program》（特殊癌症病毒项目，后面还要提到）。在此基础上，再向民用领域如医疗农业转移基因科学技术（如同计算机科学技术最初主要用于计算炮弹及洲际导弹轨迹微分方程等军事用途，后来才向民用领域转移一样）。

    2008年10月6日于欧洲中部时间上午11时30分（北京时间17时30分），瑞典卡罗林斯卡医学院诺贝尔生理学或医学奖评审委员会公布了评选结果。来自法国和德国的3名科学家因发现导致艾滋病与宫颈癌的病毒分享2008年度诺贝尔生理学或医学奖。这3人分别为发现艾滋病病毒的法国人弗朗索瓦丝·巴尔－西诺西和吕克·蒙塔尼，以及发现导致宫颈癌的人乳头状瘤病毒（HPV）的德国人哈拉尔德·楚尔·豪森。三人分享医学诺奖。评审委员会在一份公报中说，巴尔－西诺西和蒙塔尼的研究成果让研究人员能观察艾滋病病毒如何复制，以及如何与受感染者的体细胞相互作用。这又进一步让研究人员开发出验血等确诊受艾滋病病毒感染者的办法，延缓了这种病毒的传播。此外，他们的研究成果也帮助了抗艾滋病药物研究。公报说，巴尔－西诺西与蒙塔尼的研究成果“是我们从生物学上理解艾滋病与利用抗逆转录病毒治疗方法对抗它的先决条件”。按照惯例，一项诺贝尔奖最多只能3人共享。1983年，法国巴斯德研究所的蒙塔尼教授从一名患者的病变淋巴结组织中提取了一种病毒(即艾滋病病毒)，并将其称为“淋巴腺病相关病毒”(简称LAV)。为得到世界病毒学界权威的认可，蒙塔尼把病毒样本送与美国国立卫生研究所（NIH）的罗伯特·盖洛（Robert Gallo），请他帮助鉴定和审阅。　　

外行很容易忽视一个关键的细节：“为得到世界病毒学界权威的认可，蒙塔尼把病毒样本送与美国国立卫生研究所（NIH）的罗伯特·盖洛（Robert Gallo），请他帮助鉴定和审阅。”蒙塔尼发现了这个艾滋病病毒，但对艾滋病病毒的详细性质（如何与受感染者的体细胞相互作用，以及如何复制），离开美国国立卫生研究所（NIH）的罗伯特·盖洛（Robert Gallo）的帮助，他还是只知道大概，而缺乏深刻了解。　　

　 巴尔—西诺西１９４７年生于法国首都巴黎，自上世纪７０年代初以来一直在法国巴斯德研究中心工作，原本研究逆转录病毒与癌症的关系。但蒙塔尼１９８２年挑选她参与自己领导的小组，寻找艾滋病原因彻底改变了她的人生。“我的生活分成两段，一段是１９８３年以前，一段是１９８３年之后，”巴尔—西诺西如是说。１９８３年，蒙塔尼和巴尔—西诺西从艾滋病早期病人淋巴和艾滋病晚期病人血液中分离出人类免疫缺陷病毒（ＨＩＶ），即艾滋病毒。艾滋病毒发现之后，巴尔—西诺西将自己的职业生涯完全贡献给了抗击艾滋病的努力。她说，研究艾滋病既让人着迷又让人心酸。刚分离出艾滋病病毒之时，她“幼稚”地以为，这一发现能很快促成疫苗研制，阻止艾滋病流行；但直到现在，艾滋病疫苗研究只能说是“一连串失败”。艾滋病对非洲的打击让巴尔—西诺西尤为难过。她说，刚发现艾滋病毒时，哪里想得到它竟能通过性途径传播。“我们当时知道做出了一个重大发现，但我们没预料到这一疾病竟能在非洲大陆造成那么大的灾难。”这说明巴尔—西诺西对艾滋病病毒的详细性质同样是只知道大概，而缺乏深刻了解。　　

特殊癌症病毒项目（Special Virus Cancer Program）无疑是和艾滋病病毒联系在一起的。文件揭露：艾滋病的共同发现者，Robert Gallo博士，他受聘于国立艾滋癌症研究院监督立顿生物合同(71-2025)“调查灵长类的病毒癌变因子，”作为“项目主任”。 文件证明了这一点。这份文件涉及默克公司SVCP合同（71-2059），“致瘤病毒研究与疫苗发展”，由博士Maurice Hilleman领导。The SVCP is undoubtedly linked to the origin of HIV/AIDS as evidenced by its documentation revealing HIV co-discoverer, Dr. Robert Gallo, and his employment with the National Cancer Institute overseeing Litton Bionetics’s contract (71-2025) “Investigation of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates,” as “Project Officer.” This document relates to the Merck company SVCP contract (71-2059) “Oncogenic Virus Research and Vaccine Development,” directed by Dr. Maurice Hilleman. （摘自《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARDG. HOROWITZ》）　　

考虑白细胞介素-2的历史，现在的疫苗佐剂。2008年10月6日星期一（颁发诺贝尔生理学或医学奖的当天），John Niederhuber博士，美国国立癌症研究所主任，告诉纽约时报的劳伦斯Lawrence K. Altman，说Gallo博士“是有助于艾滋病毒发现的每一个主要细节。”他还说：“Gallo博士发现的白细胞介素-2（IL - 2），是免疫系统的信号分子，这对于艾滋病病毒的发现是必要的，作为一个共同发育因子使得病毒生长。”Fauci博士对这一点补充说：“毫无疑问， Gallo主任对艾滋病研究作出巨大贡献，如果规则允许四名获诺贝尔奖，主任将获诺贝尔奖”……。Regarding the history of IL-2, now in vaccine adjuvant, on Monday, Oct. 6, 2008, Dr. John Niederhuber, the director of the NCI, told Lawrence K. Altman of the New York Times that Dr. Gallo "was instrumental in every major aspect of the discovery of the AIDS virus." He added: "Dr. Gallo discovered interleukein-2 (Il-2), an immune system signaling molecule, which was necessary for the discovery of the AIDS virus, serving as a co-culture factor that allowed the virus to grow.” Dr. Fauci added to this, "There's no doubt that Bob Gallo made enormous contributions to AIDS research, and if the Nobel rules allowed four recipients, Bob would belong in the group". . . . （摘自《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARDG. HOROWITZ》）　　

Robert Gallo为了避免惹祸上身，“谦虚”地推掉了2008年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖，是一个“聪明”人！！！　　

2 精心设局   　　

2.1 偷采血样　　

　 上世纪90年代初开始，陆续有许多美中合作的人体实验项目在中国内地展开，常见的手段是美国的研究机构出钱，通过中国留学生回国做项目，在中国人中间进行人体试验，然后把试验获得的血清或DNA样本送回美国本土进行研究。　　

美国联邦机构责令哈佛大学在华人体研究全面停止。近日，美国联邦政府一机构的调查报告指出，世界著名学府哈佛大学在中国农村进行的15项人体研究不但缺乏完善的监管，并且没有向参与研究的中国人说明有关研究的危险性，同时也未确定接受实验者是否自愿接受测试，这是严重违规的行为！2002《洛杉矶时报》披露：3月29日，美国联邦政府官员发出了数封措辞严厉的斥责信，指责哈佛大学的科研做法，质疑哈佛大学在对世界上最令人垂涎的“遗传信息宝库”——中国农村人口进行科研时的道义问题！（这几乎可以断定是美国人的做戏，一个唱红脸，一个唱白脸！）由于相对偏僻，所以中国农村人的基因没有太大的变异差别，从而（让科研人员）更容易捕捉疾病的基因，因此，来自美国诸多科研机构的研究人员纷纷涌入中国农村，试图寻找包括哮喘、精神分裂症、痴肥以及染上毒瘾等疾病的基因之本。据“人类研究保护办公室”调查的结果，哈佛大学现在在华有14个科研项目，其中12个项目是由哈佛大学公共卫生学院的徐西平副教授主持进行的，其中10个项目通过当地的卫校进行，两个通过当地的医院实施。去年1月，新华社高级记者熊蕾和汪延曾经对哈佛项目在安庆的情况进行了全程调查，熊蕾描述当时的采访情况说，采访从徐西平的母校，也是哈佛项目的主要中方合作伙伴之一的安徽医科大学开始，徐西平1993年开始与安医大公共卫生学院合作，在安庆成立了美中生物医学环境卫生研究所，由安庆市卫生局跟他合作，在基层调查的基础上，通过体检取血样。熊蕾当时采访徐西平用了8个小时，徐西平承认，中国是发展中国家，跟国外合作，国外肯定有利。但是这种研究“从出论文到出专利还有很长的时间”。谈到哈佛为什么愿意同中国合作，徐西平说，最主要的原因是，在美国不好找样本，中国样本比较好。60岁的储勉斋和妻子胡祥信、女儿储召华和储召霞在1996年11月和1997年3月参加了两次“体检”。他们每人有两本当年发的健康卡，一本记载着1996年11月5日的检查，项目有心肺功能、血压等，并抽了血；另一本记载着1997年3月10日的第二次检查，也抽了血，比第一次多，但“不知有多少”。“胳膊从一个小洞伸进布帘里，医生在布帘后面，看不见”。两次都给了误工补助，头一次每人10元，第二次20元，外加两包方便面。第二次“体检”是有选择的，村里只有他们一家被挑上，而且不要儿子和外孙女，只要老两口和两个女儿去。他们愿意去，“因为大女召华的病情比较重，一到春天就咳喘得厉害，希望她能得到治疗”。但是并没有得到。只给了一个美中生物医学环境卫生研究所开的居民健康检查报告单。另外说老储有高血压，给了两瓶降压药。老储一家都肯定地说，没有人给他们看过、念过知情同意书，他们也不知道与哈佛的合作。至于血样送到哪儿去了也不知道。老储记得签过字，不过是为了领误工补助。（《北京青年报》2002年4月05日，（）内内容为笔者所加）　　

2003年10月，一场抗击肆虐一时的非典的战役暂停之后，北京大学法律系硕士——童增撰写了一本名为《最后一道防线——中国人基因流失忧思录》的书。提出―非典可能是针对中国的基因武器。能而本书由于缺乏过硬的证据，招致一些人的耻笑。（本文3.2 Adrian J Gibbs吉布兹博士《From where did the 2009 'swine-origin' influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge? 及5.1Leonard G. Horowitz的《Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and the “Man-Made” Origin of HIV/AIDS 》提供了过硬的证据）在该书中，他向全体中国人发出这样一个警示：非典可能是针对中国人的基因武器！接受记者采访时他说：“1998年，我参加过一个‘中国西部老人长寿监测服务’的国际合作项目，发现美国、德国等一些机构偷偷地在中国采集老人的血样，从事基因研究。”亲眼看见血样采集的童增，重述当时的情景时，仍然十分气愤：“美国人给中国老人采样时，一张滤纸，上面有5个圈，每个圈有1分钱硬币那么大，每个老人的血要将这样5个圈滴满才行，因此每个人至少滴11滴血。采样的要求十分严格，例如第一滴血不能要、不用碘酒等等。”　　

童增的书中指出：美国从上世纪70年代就开始研究冠状病毒，有近10个实验室从事此项研究，在世界范围内，是研究时间最长的国家。在非典期间，美国不予中国任何支持，用的药物也不公开，这与美国倡导的人道主义分明相悖。　　

2.2 全球疫苗免疫联盟与儿童计划免疫程序　　

比尔－梅琳达. 盖茨基金会，在过去十数年中，这个美国最大的免税基金会为全球疫苗免疫联盟（GAVI GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR VACCINE AND IMMUNISATION）捐出的钱达10亿美元之多。和在它一起的，还有亿万富翁瓦伦.巴菲特。盖茨基金会和研制猪流感疫苗的主力公司――葛兰素史克，都是全球疫苗免疫联盟（GAVI）的董事机构，另外一些全球性的制药公司也都是。在以往的前十年中，仅盖茨基金会就为向第三世界国家推广疫苗捐出了10亿美元；盖茨基金会也是与WHO结盟的GAVI这个公共－私人合伙机构最大的出资人。这个比尔盖茨基金会，同先正达（Syngenta）一起，还是建在极地附近斯瓦尔巴特群岛(挪威)的“拯救人类的种子地下保险库”的主要合伙者，和它们一伙的都是转基因种子制造业的大腕。还是这个比尔盖茨基金会，伙同洛克菲勒大学校长保罗.努尔斯，在他的家中发起建立了纽约亿万富豪超级私人俱乐部，它的成员中有戴维.洛克菲勒，乔治.索罗斯，以及盖茨的好友瓦伦.巴菲特，还有CNN的创建者泰德.特纳。他们自称为“好人俱乐部”。这个名称听起来很不错，但是他们没有说出来的是：“对谁好”？从他们第一次五月会议的报告所透露的信息来看，盖茨和他的亿万富翁同伙们最先考虑的问题，是如何大规模减少世界人口。这样的计划对于世界上将要“被减去”的那些人口来说，肯定不是好事。几年前，泰德.特纳在接受一家美国的（名义上的）基督教杂志采访时，曾经为自己的“22.5亿人口的世界图景”做过辩解。从1953年开始，戴维洛克菲勒和他的兄弟们就通过建立“人口委员会”这个机构，导致了推动减少人口增长的活动。这个“人口委员会”是世界上最不为人知的一个机构，却有着极大的影响力。盖茨和巴菲特都是减少世界人口项目中的主要人物，特纳也是。这些项目以慈善的面目在非洲出现，表面上为当地贫困人口提供医疗卫生服务，但是在事实上干的却是扼杀人口――用疫苗和药物为育龄妇女绝育。盖茨基金会两年前接受过巴菲特注入的巨额资金，现在又在“第二次绿色革命”的借口下，支持向非洲大陆输入转基因种子的勾当。这些登记了专利的转基因种子在非洲遭遇了大规模的抵抗。医疗专家很明确地指出过，像盖茨这样的慈善人士如果真的是想改进黑非洲的状况，用那些生产疫苗的巨额资金把供水排水系统以最低的标准改善一下，就能为那个大陆人民的健康带来革命。一个注射了疫苗的人如果饮用的还是受到粪便污染的水，那无论如何也谈不到健康。有许多机构和组织指出过，注射疫苗的真正的目标，是使人更不健康，更容易染病和死亡。　　

儿童计划免疫程序Schedule of Child Immunisation Program　　

为加速乙肝控制，使所有新生儿都有机会获得乙型疾毒性肝炎（以下简称乙肝）疫苗预防接种，****决定于2002年起将乙肝疫苗纳入儿童计划免疫。为推动西部省份和其他省份贫困地区乙肝疫苗预防接种和安全注射工作，**财政安排专项资金，同时，争取到全球疫苗免疫联盟（GAVI）和儿童疫苗基金在此领域的合作项目资金。为有效利用这一专项资金和顺利实施合作项目，达到预期目标，特制定本方案。（与全球疫苗免疫联盟(GAVI)／儿童疫苗基金合作项目实施方案（2003年2月21日　****[2003]39号文） 　　

<<疫苗流通和预防接种管理条例 >>,  颁布单位***;发文字号 ****第434号; 颁布时间 2005-03-24;生效时间 2005-06-01。　　

**自1978年开始实施儿童计划免疫，到目，预防脊髓灰质炎、乙肝、乙脑、流脑等11种传染病的9种疫苗都被纳入计划免疫程序。凡是在**生活的孩子，自出生起到19岁，都可以免费办理预防接种证，按免疫程序接种疫苗。此间，一同到**医院考察儿童预防接种工作的**区卫生局局长**向***建议：6月1日起将实施的《疫苗流通和预防接种管理条例》要求，儿童计划免疫完全纳入政府财政预算，除政府提供免费疫苗外，针具费也应免除。目前，孩子接种其中7种免费计划免疫疫苗时，每次仍需交纳3元钱的针具费，希望市政府能够尽快明确财政预算方案对计划免疫针具费的投入。***明确表示，**市政府将联合出台相关财政补贴方案，由政府出资，免去7种疫苗的针具费用，让外地在*儿童和**孩子享受同等待遇。(2005.4.27 **将出台财政补贴方案 7种计划免疫有望全免费)　　

各卫生院（所）、中小学校、托幼机构：根据《传染病防治法》有关规定和市卫;生局、市教委、市托幼办1996年联合发文《关于进一步加强凭〈**市儿童预防接种证〉办理入托、入园、入学工作的通知》精神，重申必须加强凭“预防接种证”办理入学、入园、入托工作，特通知如下：……。关于加强凭《预防接种证》办理入学、入园、入托工作的通知(发文字号：*卫防199988号　发布日期：1999/06/16   发布时间：2005-07-27 )　　

**部办公厅关于开展２００６年全国免疫规划工作检查的通知    ****发〔２００６〕１７１号  各*、***、**市卫生厅局，********卫生局，**疾病预防控制中心：为了解各地贯彻落实《疫苗流通和预防接种管理条例》和常规免疫工作开展情况，发现存在的问题，促进免疫规划工作进一步发展，**决定于２００６年１０月—１１月在全国开展免疫规划工作检查。各地要充分认识本次检查活动的重要性，做好各项准备工作，同时可结合此次检查活动组织开展自查。届时我部将组织专家分赴各地开展免疫规划工作检查，检查组成员和时间安排将另行通知。现将《２００６年免疫规划工作检查方案》印发给你们，请认真组织做好有关工作。附件：２００６年免疫规划工作检查方案 二○○六年九月十七日. 　　

**实行有计划的预防接种制度，**对儿童实行预防接种证制度。根据**部、**部《关于做好入托、入学儿童预防接种证查验工作的通知》（***发[2005]408号）要求，各学校、托幼机构在开学时，应开展入学、入托新生的预防接种证查验工作，对无预防接种证或未按国家免疫规划疫苗程序规定进行接种的学生，督促其监护人带儿童到附近的接种单位进行补证、补种。为了解我市各学校、幼儿园新生预防接种证持证情况和国家免疫规划疫苗免疫接种情况，特制定本方案。(**市小学（幼儿园）新生免疫接种情况调查实施方案)　　

推动这一切的幕后力量，就是让中国的学生家长及医生等社会各界接受并习惯最终信任疫苗！！。（当能以前的疫苗可能绝大多数是好的，但这次美国就很可能在发往北京的甲型H1N1流感疫苗生产用毒株”NYMCX-179A”中搞鬼！！！）人都具有惯性思维。当面临甲流疫苗时，人们会想，没事呀，以前都打过各种各样的疫苗呀；现在打甲流疫苗，也没问题呀，一些异常反应也是极个别情况呀！!!!!!2009“疫情甲流”注射疫苗顺序，首先就是从学校及医护人员开始，再向社会推广。这一切似乎……。2009甲流疫苗注射有一个知情同意原则，但中国有多少人知道非洲特别是扎伊尔/刚果/乌干达艾滋病泛滥的真正原因是因为美国在1962-1978年，启动了一个《Special Virus Cancer Program》项目？？为了搞出这种艾滋病病毒HIV致命的新式生物武器,在非洲,招募大量”志愿者”进行活人实验.以乙型肝炎疫苗名义,实际注射的是中间病毒及最终产物HIV艾滋病病毒，并且实验多次!!! 　　

立顿生物还专门管理国立癌症研究院设立在马里兰州德特里克堡的设施，当时立顿生物供应黑猩猩用于疾病预防控制中心，FDA，国立过敏及传染疾病研究院，默克制药公司来生产4种亚型乙型肝炎病毒的疫苗；至少在三个已知人口中测试：1.在纽约市男同性恋者2.在非洲扎伊尔/刚果/乌干达的村民和3.纽约Staten岛Willowbrook国立弱智儿童学校举行.后者研究是在美国军方与纽约大学医学中心医生扫罗克鲁格曼合同约定下进行。Litton Bionetics also exclusively administered the NCI’s facilities at Fort Detrick, Maryland at the time Litton supplied chimpanzees were used by the CDC, FDA, NIAID, and the Merck drug company to produce four subtypes of hepatitis B virus vaccines for testing on at least three known populations: 1. homosexual men in New York City, 2. African villagers in Zaire/Congo/ Uganda, and 3. Willowbrook State School for mentally retarded children on Staten Island in New York. The latter studies were conducted under U.S Army contract with the New York University Medical Center’s Dr. Saul Krugman. （摘自《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARDG. HOROWITZ》）　　

因此,领先的艾滋病毒/艾滋病美国研究所，NIAID，由美国主要的传染病官员领导，艾滋病毒/艾滋病沙皇，带领猪流感疫苗支持者，Anthony Fauci博士，已严重地犯罪般地忽视的不容忽视文件和坚实的科学表明:”默克，美国食品药物管理局，疾病预防控制中心，和他自己的国立过敏及传染疾病研究院。压制及忽视的证据，证明了世界上最致命瘟疫艾滋病的起源，是由”乙型肝炎疫苗”接种所引发,由公共卫生防护部门和私人企业联盟所推进。 Thus, the leading HIV/AIDS institute in the US, the NIAID, directed by the leading American infectious disease official, HIV/AIDS czar, and leading swine flu vaccination proponent, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has grossly and criminally neglected compelling documents and solid science that indicts Merck, the FDA, CDC, and his own NIAID. The suppressed and neglected evidence proves the origin of the world’s deadliest plague, AIDS, was triggered by hepatitis B vaccinations advanced by this alliance between these defendants’ public and private enterprises. . （摘自《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARDG. HOROWITZ》）　　

2005~2007年,中国医药卫生界,还发生了好几件大事………。　　

2.3 李钟郁博士之死与陈冯富珍“当选”及世界卫生组织真相　　

2.3.1 李钟郁博士之死　　

2006年，台湾当局在欧洲地区的活动仍然很频繁，对欧洲议会及欧盟主要国家的游说也进一步加强，重点是加强对欧洲议会、欧盟主要国家议会以及非政府组织的工作，密集邀请各欧盟国家的国会议员访台，密切与有关非政府组织的联系，加大拉拢游说力度，并取得了一定进展： 3月，德国自由民主党议员在国会提案，要求政府支持台湾成为世界卫生组织观察员；4月，比利时医事工会联盟函致比利时外交部长及公共卫生部长，要求其协助台湾加入世界卫生组织；2006年5月18日，欧洲议会通过决议案，要求世界卫生组织将台湾纳入“全球疫情警示及因应网络”（GOARN）体系，保证台湾能直接参与世界卫生组织的所有技术性会议，表达支持台湾参与世界卫生组织的立场。　　

4天之后，2006年5月22日世界卫生组织今天发布公告说，该组织总干部李钟郁博士因病于今天清晨去世，享年61岁。公告说，李钟郁博士于20日下午执行公务时突然发病，当即被送进日内瓦州医院。经诊断为脑血栓后，医院为其紧急动手术，摘除脑部血栓。但因医治无效，李钟郁博士于今天清晨7点43分去世。李钟郁是韩国人，于２００３年７月２１日就任世界卫生组织总干事。李钟郁博士之前几任，都干了5年或10年，格罗.哈莱姆.布伦特兰(挪威国籍)1998-2003，中岛宏博士（日本国籍）1988-1998。而李钟郁博士只当了3年不到，就以61岁年龄死于任上………。　　

2.3.2 陈冯富珍“当选”　　

新华社北京12月10日电 外交部副部长杨洁篪今天召见美国驻华使馆临时代办马继贤，奉命就最近美国总统克林顿签署所谓《支持台湾参与世界卫生组织》等议案向美方提出强烈抗议。《人民日报》　(1999年12月11日第2版)　　

2002年中新社北京三月十九日电中国外交部发言人章启月今天在此间表示，中国希望欧洲议会停止干扰中欧关系的活动，以利于中欧关系长期、稳定、健康地向前发展。今天的外交部记者招待会上，章启月表示，三月十四日，欧洲议会通过决议，要求欧盟委员会及欧盟成员国支持台湾作为观察员“加入”世界卫生组织。她说，世界卫生组织是一个只有主权国家才能参加的联合国专门机构。台湾作为中国的一个省，没有资格参加这个组织。　　

2002年新华社北京４月８日电，外交部发言人章启月今天在回答记者提问时说，中国坚决反对美国支持台湾“参与”世界卫生组织的做法，并已向美国方面提出了严正交涉。有记者问：据报道，美国国会不久前通过了关于支持台湾成为世界卫生组织 “观察员”的法案，近日已由美国总统签署成法。你对此有何评论？章启月回答说，世界卫生组织是只有主权国家才能参加的联合国专门机构，台湾作为中国的一部分，根本没有资格参与该组织。　　

2003年新华网北京３月１４日电 ，外交部发言人孔泉１４日回答记者提问时说，中国政府坚决反对美国众议院通过关于支持台湾参与世界卫生组织的议案。有记者问，据报道，美国会众议院３月１１日未经实质性辩论即表决通过了关于支持台湾参与世界卫生组织（ＷＨＯ）的议案。请问中方对此有何评论？孔泉回答说，世界卫生组织系由主权国家组成的联合国专门机构，台湾作为中国的一部分，没有资格参加该组织，也无权成为世界卫生大会的观察员。自１９９７年以来，世界卫生大会多次否决了所谓支持台湾参与世界卫生组织的提案。 　　

2004年台湾衛生當局以“總統”陳水扁名義申請加入世界卫生组织的「观察員」席次，未成功，但美國及日本首度公開投票支持。2005年世界衛生組織秘书处曾於2005年與中國簽訂秘密「谅解备忘录」（MOU），該條款要求一切台湾执行权力与出席会议都必須通告中國政府。2005年中国国民党與中国共产党共同發表「兩岸和平发展共同愿望」，提出在促進恢復兩岸協商後，討論台灣民眾關心的參與國際活動的問題，包括优先討論參与世界卫生组织活動的問題。（据维基百科 台灣與世界卫生組織的關係）　　

外交部网站 2004/06/15《外交部发言人章启月就美国签署支持台湾参与世卫组织的法案答记者问》 问：近日，美国总统签署了美国会不久前通过的支持台湾参与世界卫生组织的法案，并通过白宫发表声明称，美国政府的一个中国政策没有改变。请问你对此有何评论？答：中方曾多次就上述法案向美方提出严正交涉。我们对美方不顾中方立场，签署这一错误法案表示坚决反对。台湾是中国的一部分。根据联合国大会有关决议和世界卫生组织规定，台湾没有资格作为会员或准会员加入世卫组织，也无资格作为观察员参与世卫组织的活动。在前不久举行的第57届世界卫生大会上，广大成员国拒绝了台湾当局挤入世卫组织的图谋，这反映了国际社会在此问题上的广泛共识和鲜明态度。　　

2006年中新社北京九月七日电，中国外交部发言人秦刚今天说，中央政府，包括外交部、及中国驻外使领馆都对陈冯富珍女士竞选世界卫生组织总干事予以支持，希望陈冯富珍女士能够竞选成功。　　

2006年中新网11月7日电 代表中国出选世界卫生组织总干事的香港前卫生署长陈冯富珍，在第一回合占尽上风，以最高票数闯进五强。香港明报报道说，陈冯富珍与4名候选人今日将接受执委质询，陈冯富珍将是最后的一人。大会明日将进入最后投票阶段，选出世卫总干事人选，后日正式宣布结果。第二轮的选举胜负关键之一，是非洲9个执委国的投票意向。有消息人士表示对陈冯富珍有信心，因为陈冯富珍在多轮投票中都高票当选，二是非洲候选人已出局，相信非洲票会转向陈冯富珍。国家卫生部长高强早前表示，已得到非洲、亚洲和欧美国家支持陈冯富珍出任世卫总干事。世卫执委会于北京时间昨天下午4时半开始在日内瓦，分两节举行长达6小时的会议，由34个执委国代表，每人从11名候选人中，选出心目中的“五强”。有执委成员国外交家表示，他们认为最终会是墨西哥、中国和日本之争。　　

2006年中新网11月9日电 在世界卫生组织执委会三十四名执委于八日在日内瓦针对五名总干事候选人进行的秘密投票中，经过四轮投票的激烈竞争，中国推荐的陈冯富珍击败其它四名候选人，当选世界卫生组织总干事唯一候选人。香港报章今天透露了此次投票的过程。首轮投票：中国代表陈冯富珍获得10票，日本的尾身茂9票，墨西哥的弗伦克6票，西班牙的萨尔加多5票，科威特的贝赫贝哈尼4票。由于没有候选人获过半票数，得票最少的科威特代表首先出局。第2轮投票：陈冯富珍11票，弗伦克10票，尾身茂维持9票，萨尔加多4票宣告出局。第3轮投票：陈冯富珍15票，弗伦克和尾身茂维持10票和9票，后者得票最少出局。第4轮投票：陈冯富珍24票，弗伦克10票。　　

中新网11月7日电中“有执委成员国外交家表示，他们认为最终会是墨西哥、中国和日本之争。”表明在11月9日电正式投票前，“五强” 中国、 墨西哥、日本、西班牙、科威特中的西班牙、科威特早已经被幕后力量决定为仅仅是一个陪衬！！最后一轮投票（第4轮）中国对阵墨西哥，原来日本的票源9票全部转移到中国，陈冯富珍24票，大比分“击败”佛伦克。美国最后一轮投票支持中国。李外长向当时的美国副国务卿伯恩斯表示感谢。但是美国助理国务卿艾文诺比在美国说，美国认为美国并不是投中国的票，而是投票给陈冯富珍。这是一场表面看似激烈，其实早已经被幕后力量暗中决定了，一切尽在掌控中！！墨西哥是美国的经济政治军事附庸国，美国要它往东，它不敢往西。2006年日本又是极度亲美的小泉及安贝执政。墨西哥日本的票源投给谁，最终决定权在美国人手中！！如果第4轮投票中，日本的票源中9票只要有8票投给墨西哥的弗伦克，陈冯富珍就休想当选！！！2004年台湾申請加入世卫的「观察員」席次，未成功，但美國及日本首度公开投票支持。而美国分别在1999，2002，2003，2004年多次不遗余力支持台湾加入世卫，以达到支持台独分裂中国的目的。美国日本为何在2006年11月9日世界卫生组织总干事人选投票这样关键时刻，突能转变态度，将票投给陈冯富珍，难道美国日本是白痴弱智？？当能不是！！这可能是美国和中国暗中达成协议,你中国少在中东给我捣乱,我美国支持你中国派出人员当选世卫总干事。中国自以为占了大便宜，却不知已钻进美国惊心设计的大骗局中。美国日本的真正意图是什么？？陈冯富珍和美国又是什么关系？？　　

2.3.3 世界卫生组织真相　　

在大多数中国人心目中，世界卫生组织是一个庄严神圣的组织，世界卫生组织总干事自能是一个庄严神圣之人，世界卫生组织总干事陈冯富珍又是香港人，她说的话总可以相信吧！我们这个民族被蒙蔽太深太久了！！欲探索世界卫生组织真相，请认真看一下电影《卡桑德拉大桥》(THE CASSANDRA CROSSING)，一定大有帮助。此片，1976由西德/意大利/英国拍摄，首映日期为1976年12月18日。　　

电影内容为：两名恐怖分子想要炸毁位于日内瓦的国际卫生组织（世界卫生组织）实验中心，行动失败，其中一名被击毙，另一名沾染了实验室的肺鼠疫恶性传染病菌逃上了开往瑞典的火车。为确保病菌不被扩散，上校麦卡其（美国军人）及有关方面下令封死列车，并让列车改道开往年久失修的卡桑德拉大桥，人为制造翻车事故以掩盖真相。电影不是空穴来风，非常可能暗指美国1976猪流感流行及疫苗事件。　　

1976年1月的迪克斯堡（后面的2.3Leonard G. Horowitz博士的分析还提到迪克斯堡），美国陆军在新泽西的一个训练中心。一个士气高涨的新兵戴维·刘易斯，开始感到头晕、恶心、无力、发烧、肌肉疼痛：这些都只是流感的典型病症。但是，18岁的刘易斯决定在体能训练中出人头地，他仍然背起50磅的背包，参加了在新泽西寒冷冬季的整夜行军。虽然发着烧，他仍强迫自己继续前进。几个小时后他倒下了。在到达基地医院几个小时后，刘易斯不治身死。１９７６年３月１３日，ＣＤＣ主任戴维·森瑟尔向国会提交报告，申请拨款，以研制足够多的疫苗来为至少８０％的美国人接种，以防猪流感扩散。3月24日，一群科学家应福特总统的邀请，聚集白宫。福特直截了当地提问：“你们是否同意说我国正面临着一场猪流感流行病，因此需要进行群众性接种？”没有人提出异议。当晚，福特举行全国记者招待会：“本人请求国会在4月休会前，拨出1.35亿美元，供生产足够的疫苗使用，以便使美国的每一个男人、女人和儿童都能接种。”但是最初研制出来的疫苗的试用，却并不顺利。专家来了个180度大转弯，认为疫苗对儿童根本不起作用，对年轻的成年人的效果也甚差，一些支持接种疫苗的人士也公开表示担心。直到1976年8月2日。这一天，数名老兵由于突患严重的呼吸道疾病而病倒。他们患病前曾于7月21日—24日在费城参加美国军团大会。这个主要由二战老兵组成的组织，当时包下了费城的四个饭店开会，庆祝美国建国200周年。开会的第二天晚上，两名军团成员病倒，病症包括发烧、肌肉疼痛和肺炎。不到一周，宾州卫生厅收到的报告就如雪片一般，说是7月下旬，费城一些饭店的客人发生急性肺炎，有人死亡。最后，患病人数达到182例，29人死亡。最终收集的数字表明，约82%是美国军团成员。死亡的29人，到底死于何因？？？？？？神秘的费城流行病——报纸称之为“军团症”，使得人们对猪流感的恐惧猛然升级。消息像一道闪电撞击着国会和白宫，政治家们立即行动起来，他们“害怕”令人担心的猪流感流行病果真到来。１９７６年１０月１日，美国国家流感免疫计划正式开始执行。到１９７６年１０月１１日，约４０００万美国人（约占总人口的２４％）接受注射新研制出来的流感疫苗，接种时采用的新型压缩空气注射器也让美国人耳目一新。福特总统对计划的顺利开展很是得意，他接受流感接种的照片出现在很多大报的头版。（这次甲流，奥巴马接种疫苗的照片也在各大媒体中与读者见面）但在１９７６年１０月１１日晚，免疫计划遭遇第一次打击：匹兹堡市的３位老人在接种后当即死亡。10月11日，《匹兹堡新闻邮报》晚间版登载了一条消息，说两位老人在阿勒格尼县卫生局接种猪流感疫苗后不久死亡。媒体闻风而动，虽然没有确切的证据，仍将３人的死亡与流感免疫计划联系起来。政府此前担心的是猪流感，现在担心的则是民众恐慌了。匹兹堡３位老人的死亡使免疫计划严重受挫，此后的事故更是使这项计划雪上加霜。几周之后，有关格林－巴利综合征的报道见诸报端——一些人在接种疫苗后出现了麻痹性的神经肌肉紊乱。美国公众不再相信政府的免疫计划，他们认为这个计划“使老人致死，使孩子致残”。１９７６年１２月１６日，美国国家流感免疫计划寿终正寝。１９８０年１０月１７日，《纽约时报》上的一则消息称，美国销毁了剩下的价值４９００万美元的流感疫苗。（以上综合青年参考2009-05-26及科技日报2009-06-19）　　

毕竞欧洲人和美国多年打交道，深知他们搞的那几套鬼把戏。1976年12月18日，美国国家流感免疫计划寿终正寝2天后，由西德/意大利/英国拍摄的电影《卡桑德拉大桥》(THE CASSANDRA CROSSING) 首映。　　

Jonathan Mann是早期防治艾滋病毒的一个关键人物。他辞去在世卫组织的职务，以抗议联合国对艾滋病缺乏反应，以及当时世界卫生组织总干事中岛宏（日本人）的行为。Jonathan Mann的防治艾滋病工作，他与中岛宏的冲突及其冲突对世卫组织艾滋病防治工作的影响已作为前线PBS纪录片 “艾滋病的岁月” 的一部分。在曼的任期内，艾滋病项目成为世卫组织历史上最大单一项目。他是一个强调全球应对危机需要的关键人物。（译自 Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia）　　

已故世界卫生组织（WHO）艾滋病主任博士Dr. Jonathan Mann曾充满智慧地说“超过一个医疗科学问题，艾滋病是一件强加于人的社会政治事件。”Dr. Jonathan Mann及其妻子Mary Lou Clements-Mann （HIV/AIDS研究者）不幸死于1998年9月2日赴欧洲艾滋病大会的瑞士航空111航班（从New York City到瑞士日内瓦）。此次空难造成包括夫妻在内共229人遇难!!此次空难是否又一个“卡桑德拉大桥”事件？？　　

3“猪源甲型（H1N1）流感病毒可能是人为制造”印尼卫生部长及吉布兹博士的分析　　

3.1印尼卫生部长苏帕莉的分析　　

印尼卫生部长苏帕莉本月初出版了一本书，书名叫做《是时候改变世界了——禽流感背后神秘之手》，书中指责美国用印尼向世卫提交的离流感病毒样本制造生化武器。美国国防部长盖茨近日访问印尼，不想却遭遇尴尬。盖茨日前在雅加达印尼国际事务委员会发表讲话时，有记者问及美国是否在利用印尼提供的禽流感病毒样本研发生化武器。对此，盖茨显得十分生气，他回答说："这是我所听过最可笑的事情。"印尼卫生部长出书爆料据印尼媒体报道，该记者的提问并非没有根据，印尼卫生部长苏帕莉本月初出版了一本书，书名叫做《是时候改变世界了——禽流感背后神秘之手》。苏帕莉在书中指责印尼向世卫组织提交的禽流感病毒样本受到美国军方的控制。而对于世卫组织与美国国家实验室共享禽流感病毒样本，她也表示担心。苏帕莉还指责某些发达国家“盗用印尼向世卫组织提供的禽流感病毒样本”。她说：“发达国家越来越富有，因为他们有能力研发疫苗，控制世界。”世卫表示不理解该书一经翻译成英文，立刻引起了多方强烈反应。近日，美国国务院发言人苏珊·斯塔尔对苏帕莉的指责予以否认，并表示美方只是公开获取基因序列数据，从而有助于跟踪禽流感病毒。世卫组织方面也表示不理解，认为禽流感病毒目前还没 有人传人，很难想像用它研发生化武器。印尼政府也表示，该书只是个人观点，不代表政府态度。另据印尼媒体报道，日前，印尼又宣布将重新向世卫组织提交禽流感病毒样本。而苏帕莉声称她的书翻译有误，目前已经停止销售该书的英文版本。(2008.02.28)　　

据法新社报道，印度尼西亚卫生部长西蒂·法蒂拉·苏帕莉(Siti Fadilah Supari)于周二(28日)表示，致命的猪流感病毒有可能是“人造”的；她呼吁人们对于肆虐全球的猪流感疫情保持镇静。这位部长在新闻发布会上说，并不清楚猪流感病毒是否由基因工程设计加工而成，但不排除此种可能性。2003年，印尼受禽流感病毒的影响最为严重，有250人死亡，而此次并未发现猪流感病例。(2009.04.28)　　

3.2 吉布兹博士的分析　　

        Adrian J Gibbs吉布兹博士75岁,他是Tamiflu达菲（非典、禽流感、和猪流感的特效药都是一个药物—Tamiflu达菲)及 Relenza(瑞乐莎)研发机构的成员之一,单独或与人合作写了250篇关于病毒的科学文章,在堪培拉澳大利亚国立大学的39年学术生涯中。与所谓的专家院士相比较，他才是真正的专家。他一说甲型H1N1流感病毒源自实验室，惊动世界，搞得世界卫生组织都不得不对此作出回应！！　　

澳大利亚病毒专家吉布兹(Adrian Gibbs)在一份即将公布的报告中声称，甲型H1N1流感病毒源自实验室，而非大自然，甚至很有可能是故意制造出来的。现已退休的吉布兹上周末将此事上报给位于日内瓦的世界卫生组织总部，称即将在网上公布此报告。吉布兹是首位对甲型H1N1流感病毒的基因组成进行分析的科学家。吉布兹及两名同事对流感病毒8个基因编码的数百个氨基酸(amino acids)序列都进行分析后发现:把甲型流感病毒的基因序列和另一个相近似的病毒基因序列相比较，然后看看两者的区别有多少。甲型流感病毒和猪的流感病毒相比较，这两者是近亲。用这个证据作为线索，可以推测出病毒在过去发生了怎样的变化。该病毒基因突变的频率比通常猪身上的病毒高出3倍，说明病毒不可能来自于猪。只可能是病毒在传染到人身上时，先接触到了猪而已。病毒可从实验室中溜出去，最近的一次是在英国，有一次大规模的口蹄疫爆发。这场灾难的起因就是英国一个安全严密的口蹄疫研究机构发生了泄露。有人把活的病毒从下水道中冲走了。病毒从下水道出去后传到了附近的牛的体内，最后传遍了英国，造成了数百万英镑的损失。在接受媒体的电话采访中，他表示:“只要我们搞清楚病毒究竟是从何而来，我们才会更加安全。我的研究结果已经得到了包括孟菲斯圣·朱迪儿童研究医院的科研人员里查德·维比(Richard J.Webby)博士等科学家的支持。获知此事后，世界卫生组织已经展开调查，世卫组织表示，病毒的流传不排除是学者失误的可能性。世界卫生组织副干事长福田敬二表示，最初的H1N1新型流感病毒分析报告确实认为该病毒的产生有其他的解释，但吉布兹的论断并非最正确的解释。(2009.05.14)福田敬二说的非常含糊其词,搞不清他到底想表达什么?说明世界卫生组织对此非常暧昧,心中有鬼。　　

国际权威病毒学期刊VIROLOGY JOURNAL第6期发表了Gibbs与两名合共同完成的《From where did the 2009 'swine-origin' influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge?》请注意，此文章收到日期是2009年7月29日，接受及发表为2009年11月24日；此时中国大规模接种已20多天了，中国已有近2000万人接种疫苗！！为什么没有在10月24日，9月24日发表？下面是文章摘要.　　

3.2.1  Introduction and Phylogenetic Studies介绍和系统发育研究
    The swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus that appeared in 2009 and was first found in human beings in Mexico, is a reassortant with at least three parents. Six of the genes ，those encoding the polymerase proteins (PB2, PB1 and PA), the haemagglutinin (HA), the nucleoprotein (NP) and the non-structural proteins (NS)，are closest in sequence to those of H1N2 'triple-reassortant' influenza viruses isolated from pigs in North America around 1999-2000. Its other two genes are from different Eurasian 'avian-like' viruses of pigs; the neuraminidase （NA ）gene is closest to H1N1 viruses isolated in Europe in 1991-1993, and the matrix proteins（MP） gene is closest to H3N2 viruses isolated in Asia in 1999-2000. 　　

猪源流感A型病毒（H1N1）出现在2009年，首次在墨西哥人体内发现，是一个至少有三个父母的重配病毒。 病毒的6个基因序列，那些编码聚合酶蛋白（PB2，PB1和PA）、血凝素（HA）、核蛋白（NP）和非结构蛋白（NS），和那些在北美1999-2000年左右猪身上分离出的H1N2'三重配'流感病毒最接近。病毒的其他两个基因来自不同的欧亚'类禽流样'猪病毒；神经氨酸酶（NA）基因最接近1991-1993年欧洲分离出H1N1病毒， 基质蛋白（MP）基因最接近1999-2000年亚洲分离出H3N2病毒。　　

Our analyses showed that almost all the closest genes came from pig isolates. The NA genes closest to the 04/2009 NA were all from 'avian-like' H1N1 isolates from Europe sampled around 1991; closest were A/swine/Spain/WVL6/1991 (H1N1) (0.0706 nucleotide substitutions/site: ns/s), A/swine/England/WVL7/1992 (H1N1) (0.0718ns/s) and A/swine/England/WVL10/1993 (H1N1) (0.0753ns/s). The MP genes closest to the 04/2009 MP gene were also from 'avian-like' isolates but collected in Asia around 1999; closest were A/swine/Hong Kong/5200/1999 (H3N2), A/swine/Hong Kong/51901999 (H3N2) and A/swine/Hong Kong/5212/1999 (H3N2) (all 0.0254 ns/s). The other six genes, including the HA gene, were closest to those of North American 'triple-reassortant' isolates sampled around or soon after 1999; most were H1N2 isolates from pigs, although a few of the polymerase genes were close to H3N2 isolates (data not shown). We narrowed the search for the triple reassortant parent by assuming, as is likely, that the six S-OIV genes came from a single triple reassortant rather than two or more. We found that there were five triple-reassortant isolates with four or five genes that were among the twenty closest to those of 04/2009 (Table 1). Closest of all were A/swine/Indiana/9K035/1999 (H1N2), A/swine/Indiana/P12439/2000 (H1N2) and A/swine/Minnesota/55551/2000 (H1N2)。　　

我们的分析表明，几乎所有的最接近基因来自猪个体。最接近04/2009病毒（H1N1甲流病毒）的NA基因，都来自于1991年左右从欧洲样本分离出'类禽流样'H1N1病毒；最接近的是A/swine/Spain/WVL6/1991 (H1N1)（0.0706 nucleotide substitutions/site: ns/s），A/swine/England/WVL7/1992 (H1N1) (0.0718ns/s) and A/swine/England/WVL10/1993 (H1N1) (0.0753ns/s)。最接近04/2009病毒（甲流病毒）的MP基因，都来自于1999年左右从亚洲样本分离出'类禽流样'病毒；最接近的是A/swine/Hong Kong/5200/1999 (H3N2), A/swine/Hong Kong/51901999 (H3N2) and A/swine/Hong Kong/5212/1999 (H3N2) (all 0.0254 ns/s)。其余六个基因，包括血凝素基因（HA），最接近1999年左右或后不久的北美'三重配'分离样本；大多数是从猪身上分离出H1N2毒株，虽然有少数聚合酶基因接近H3N2型毒株（数据未显示）。我们缩小了三重配父母的搜索范围，通过假定，因为很可能，该6个猪源流感病毒基因从一个三重配来，而不是两个或更多。我们发现有五个三重配毒株，五个中有四个是在那些最接近04/2009病毒的20个毒株群体之内。最接近的是A/swine/Indiana/9K035/1999 (H1N2), A/swine/Indiana/P12439/2000 (H1N2) and  A/swine/Minnesota/55551/2000 (H1N2)。　　

So, in summary, Phylogenetic Studies provide consistent evidence that the immediate parents were swine viruses. The sampling dates of those isolates are congruent with the estimated lengths of 'unsampled ancestry' of the parents and, together with differences in provenance support the conclusion that S-OIV had three parents; one from North America, one from Europe and the third from Asia.　　

因此，简言之，系统发育研究提供了一致证据表明，新病毒的直接家长即猪病毒。这些分离样本的抽样时间与“无样本祖先”家长时间估计长度一致，并与产地的不同这一点共同支持结论；即猪起源流感病毒有三位家长，一个来自北美，一个来自欧洲，第三个来自亚洲。　　

3.2.2 Hypotheses假定　　

Some of the crucial evidence provided by the phylogenetic analyses is that: 由系统发育分析所提供的一些关键证据是：
   1) S-OIV emerged into the human population on a single occasion, probably in Mexico.2) S-OIV is a reassortant with at least three parental viruses, all of them viruses of pigs.3) the parents of S-OIV were last sampled directly in three very distant parts of the world.4) the parental genes were last sampled more than a decade ago. Two were sampled around 11 years ago, the third 17 years ago, whereas their sister and cousin lineages have been sampled frequently. 1）猪源流感病毒在人类的出现，在一个场合，可能在墨西哥。2）猪源流感病毒是一个至少有三个父母重配病毒，所有这些病毒来自猪。3）猪源流感病毒的父母直接取样于世界三个非常遥远地方。4）猪源流感病毒父母的基因取样于10多年前。两个取样于11年前，第三个17年前，它们的姐妹和表哥谱系可经常被取样。　　

S-OIV could have been generated by natural means. The parental isolates could, for example, have been assembled in one place by migratory birds, however the consistent link of S-OIV's immediate ancestors with pigs suggests that human activity of some sort was involved in bringing together the parental viruses. At least two contrasting theories are congruent with this possibility and the available clues: 猪源流感病毒可能是自然方式生成。父母毒株可能，例如通过候鸟集结在一个地方，但猪源流感病毒的直接祖先是猪的铁定联系表明，某种形式的人类活动引起了病毒父母的汇集。至少有两个截然不同的理论和这种可能性及可用线索相符合。　　

1) The "unsampled pig herd" theory was suggested by Smith and his colleagues, who concluded that "the progenitor of the S-OIV epidemic originated in pigs", and the "long unsampled history observed for every segment" of the S-OIV genome "suggests that the reassortment of Eurasian and North American swine lineages may not have occurred recently, and it is possible that this single reassortant lineage has been cryptically circulating rather than two distinct lineages of swine flu", and that "Movement of live pigs between Eurasia and North America seems to have facilitated the mixing of diverse swine influenzas, leading to the multiple reassortment events associated with the genesis of the S-OIV strain."　　

It is important to note that this theory depends on the intercontinental movement of live infected pigs, and requires at least two quarantine-breaching incursions involving three different countries. It is likely that quarantine control of the spread of swine influenzas around the world varies greatly in its efficacy. However viruses of the Eurasian 'avian-like' lineage, and their genes, have never been found in North America before S-OIV appeared, even though they have been common in Europe for over three decades, and similarly 'triple reassortant' viruses and their genes have not been isolated in Europe, although they have been the dominant swine influenza virus in North America for more than a decade。　　

1）“无取样猪群”论，由Smith和他的同事提出，断定“流行猪源流感病毒的祖辈起源于猪”， 猪源流感病毒基因上“观察到的每一个基因片断长期无样本历史” 表明，“欧亚族和北美族猪流感病毒重配可能没有在最近发生，也许这种重配病毒已经神秘传播，而不是两个不同族猪流感病毒”，而且“在欧亚大陆与北美之间的生猪运输似乎促进了不同的猪流感病毒混合，导致了和猪源流感病毒毒株基因关联的多重配事件。“(Gavin J. D. Smith是香港大学李嘉诚Li Ka Shing医学院的微生物系及公立紧急传染病重点实验室的研究人员，他们在自然NATURE 459期,发表<<Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic>>,5月24收稿、6月4日接受、6月11日在线发表, 主张猪源流感病毒的多基因祖先并不表明它的人工起源.
   重要的是要指出，这一理论取决于感染活猪洲际运动，需要至少两个违反检疫入侵，涉及三个不同的国家。很可能对世界各地的猪流感病毒传播检疫控制，极大地减少了这种因素效果。实际上，“类禽流感”族欧亚流感病毒，及它们的基因，从来没有在北美洲发现，在猪源流感病毒出现之前，尽管它们已在欧洲经常出现超过30年；类似于'三重配'病毒和他们的基因从没有在欧洲被分离出来，尽管它们已经主导北美猪流感病毒超过10年。
  2) The "laboratory error" theory. We note that influenza viruses survive well in virus laboratories, that laboratories are not subject to routine surveillance, and that there are probably many laboratories in the world that share and propagate a range of swine influenza viruses from different sources and continents, and also share and use immortalized lines of cultured cells. The viruses are used for research, diagnostic tests and for making vaccines, and the cells are used for propagating the viruses. Thus if S-OIV had been generated by laboratory activity, when one host was simultaneously infected with strains from the different parental lineages, this would explain most simply why S-OIV's genes had escaped surveillance for over a decade, and how viruses last sampled in North America, Europe and Asia became assembled in one place and generated a reassortant。　　

So what sort of laboratory event might produce mixed infections with different strains of influenza, and thereby generate S-OIV? The simplest is that S-OIV is a reassortant produced during research. There is also the possibility that it was generated during the production of multivalent vaccines. Multivalent 'killed' vaccines are mixtures of virions that have been grown in hen's eggs and then chemically sterilized. Thus a reassortant might be produced if insufficient sterilant, usually formaldehyde or propiolactone, is added to the virion mixture. The live mixture could then infect pigs 'vaccinated' with it, and the growing viruses could reassort, infect piggery staff and hence spread to the broader human population. Finally, it is possible that serially passaged cells, such as the Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells now widely used in influenza laboratories, became latently and serially infected with different strains of influenza as a result of lax laboratory practices. This process could generate reassortants, and infect staff.　　

2）“实验室错误”的理论。我们注意到，流感病毒在病毒实验室生存的很好，实验室不受日常监管，世界上很多实验室可能共享和传播来自不同来源和大陆的一定范围内猪流感病毒，而且共享和使用培养细胞的生产线。这些病毒被用于研究，诊断测试和制造疫苗，细胞被用来传播、繁殖病毒。因此，如果猪源流感病毒是由实验室活动产生，当一个宿主被同时来自不同父母谱系毒株感染，这可以最简单地解释为什么猪源流感病毒逃脱监管超过十年，最后样本在北美，欧洲和亚洲的病毒如何聚集在一个地方，产生了重配。
   那么什么样的实验室事件可能会产生不同的流感病毒毒株混合感染，从而产生猪源流感病毒？最简单的是，猪源流感病毒是一个研究过程中重配产物。还有一种可能性，它是在多价疫苗生产过程中产生。多价'减毒'疫苗是那些病毒，在鸡蛋中培育然后化学消毒，的混合物。因此，一个重配可能会产生，如果没有充分的消毒，通常甲醛或丙内酯被添加到病毒混合物。病毒活混合物可以感染猪，通过接种疫苗，后来不断增长的病毒可能发生重组，感染养猪场工作人员，从而扩大到更广泛人群。最后，它有可能是病毒连续通过细胞，如Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) 细胞（目前广泛使用在流感实验室），导致不同流感病毒毒株潜在地及连续地感染，作为一个不严格实验室做法的结果。这一进程可能会产生重配病毒，并感染人员。　　

3.2.3 Circumstantial Evidence旁证　　

   There are clear historical precedents for most of the events described in the above scenarios. Viruses do 'escape' from laboratories, even high security facilities. The H1N1 influenza lineage that circulated in the human population for four decades after the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic, disappeared during the 1957 Asian influenza pandemic, was absent for two decades, but then reappeared in 1977. Gene sequences of the 1977 isolate and others collected in the 1950s were almost identical, indicating that the virus had not replicated and evolved in the interim, and had probably been held in a laboratory freezer between 1950 and 1977 and 'escaped' during passaging. The suggestion that persistently infected cells might be involved is also not outlandish; influenza virus can persistently and latently infect MDCK cells, and viruses do travel between laboratories in cells。对上述事件情况描述已有明确的历史先例。病毒确实从实验室中'逃跑'，即使有高度保护设施。H1N1家族流感病毒，在人类传播了40年自1918年西班牙流感疫情之后，在1957年亚洲流感大流行后失踪，消失了20年，但随后在1977年重新出现。1977年分离基因序列和在20世纪50年代收集的基因序列几乎相同，这表明病毒并没有复制和演变在中间期，并可能在1950年至1977年保存在实验室冷冻器，又在中间期内“逃脱”出来。持续感染细胞可能导致流感大流行的想法也不是古怪的，流感病毒能够持续和潜伏感染MDCK细胞，病毒确实在实验室细胞之间旅行。

　　

Finally there is the report that the first human S-OIV infections were in Perote, a small Mexican town with a very large number of large piggeries, although it was also reported that none of the pigs showed signs of influenza. Among the earliest cases were some in Oaxaca, 290 kms to the south。 Perote is an unlikely place for an infected migratory pig to arrive from an intercontinental trip, as the town is in a remote high valley surrounded by mountains, 200 kms to the east of Mexico City where there is the nearest major airport, and 130 kms from the nearest port at Vera Cruz.最后，整个报告中，第一个人类猪源流感病毒感染者居住在Perote，一个拥有非常大规模的大型养猪场墨西哥小镇，虽然报告说没有发现猪有猪流感迹象。最早的个案之中有一个在Oaxaca州，Perote290南公里。Perote不象是一个经过跨洲之旅的迁徙感染猪聚集点，Perote是一个被群山包围的偏僻山区小镇，距离墨西哥城以东200公里，哪里有最近的主要航空港，距离最近的港口Vera Cruz有130公里。　　

3.2.4 Motifs and Sequence Signatures  基因图案和序列标记　　

An oddity of the S-OIV genome is that its PB1-F2 gene is truncated. In most influenza viruses the PB1 gene encodes three proteins. The primary ORF encodes the PB1 and PB1-N40 proteins, and the PB1-F2 ORF, which encodes a proapoptotic protein of 90 amino acids, is in the second (+1) reading frame of the gene starting at nt 95. In a small number of influenzas, including all S-OIVs, the PB1-F2 ORF is truncated by termination codons at positions 12, 58 and 88, and its absence is associated with avirulence in mice。另一个古怪的猪源流感病毒的基因是其PB1 - F2基因被截断。在大多数流感病毒PB1基因编码三种蛋白质。主要的ORF编码PB1和PB1 - N40蛋白，而PB1 - F2，编码凋亡蛋白通过90个氨基酸，在第二个阅读框架基因从nt95开始。在少数的流感，包括所有的S – OIVs，PB1 - F2 ORF在位置12，58和88被终止密码子截断，这种截断造成的缺乏与小鼠实验无毒性相关。（目的是使猪源流感病毒对某些特定种族无毒，而对其它种族有毒？）　　

It seems that the peculiarities of the S-OIV PB1-F2 gene, the human-like signature sites and its selectively super-imposed termination codons, probably reflect the outcome of selection rather than being of "little or no evolutionary significance"。看来，猪源流感病毒PB1-F2基因有特殊性，在类人识别标志位置，被选择性覆盖通过终止密码子，可能反映了（人为）选择的结果，而非 “很少或没有进化意义”.　　

Finally, we examined the NS1 protein, which in c. 80% of over 3000 sequences obtained from Genbank (July 2009) were full length, and at the C-terminus had an intact '-ESEV' motif or a similar sequence, which has been linked with virulence。 7% of the NS1s were, like that of S-OIV, only 219 amino acids long and terminating in '-QK'; most of them (66%) had come from pig isolates, 20% from human, 8% birds, 5% horses and fewer than 1% from mink and dogs, but none were as short as the NS1 protein experimentally truncated to 126 amino acids to attenuate the virus for use in a live vaccine。最后，我们研究它的NS1蛋白，从基因库（2009年7月）3000多个序列中获得了80％是全长的，并在C-末端有一个完整的'ESEV'图案或类似的序列，它与毒力相关。 NS1的7％，象猪源流感病毒，有219个氨基酸长并终止在-QK，其中大多数（66％）来自猪个体，20%来自人，8％来自鸟类，5％来自马匹，不到1％来自水貂和狗，但是没有一个象用在活疫苗中减毒病毒的NS1蛋白那样实验性地截断为126个氨基酸那样短。
   Thus our examination of sequence signatures and motifs in the S-OIV genome has not clarified our knowledge of its origins, but has certainly raised many new questions。因此，我们对猪源流感病毒基因组的基因序列标记和图案检验没有澄清我们的关于起源知识，但确实提出了很多新问题。　　

3.2.5 Conclusion 结论　　

The phylogenetic information presently available does not identify the source of S-OIV, however it provides some clues, which can be translated into hypotheses of where and how it might have originated. Two contrasting possibilities have been described and discussed in this commentary, but more data are needed to distinguish between them. It would be especially valuable to have gene sequences of isolates filling the time and phylogenetic gap between those of S-OIV and those closest to it. We believe that these important sequences are most likely to be found in isolates from as-yet-unsampled pig populations or as-yet-unsampled laboratories, especially those holding isolates of all three clusters of viruses closest to those of S-OIV, and involved in vaccine research and production. Quarantine and trade records of live pigs entering North America could probably focus the search for the unsampled pig population. It is likely that further information about S-OIV's immediate ancestry will be obtained when the unusual features of its PB1-F2 gene are understood.　　

目前可得到的系统发育信息并未明确猪源流感病毒来源，但是它提供了一些线索，可以产生一些假设：它在何处以及如何起源。两个对立的可能性已被描述和讨论在此评论中，但需要更多的数据对它们加以区分。在猪源流感病毒和那些接近它们的病毒之间，（寻找）样本基因序列填补时间和系统发育缺口将具有特别价值。我们相信：这些重要的基因序列，最有可能在未取样猪或未取样实验室的样本中发现，特别是那些拥有全部最接近那些猪源流感病毒三组毒株并参与疫苗研究和生产的实验室。进入北美生猪的检疫和贸易记录也许可以聚焦在搜索未取样猪上。很可能关于猪源流感病毒直接祖先的更多信息会获得，当猪源流感病毒的PB1 - F2基因不寻常性质被理解时。　　

3.3 对吉布兹博士分析的分析 　　

Gibbs博士首先根据新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒基因及与之最接近的病毒基因比较,得出新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒基因来源于猪病毒，并至少是个三重配病毒的结论。在此基础上，又仔细比较了两种相对立的假说。1：猪群自然起源；2：实验室起源。没有明确肯定实验室起源，但从文章中可以看出，偏向于实验室起源。在实验室起源中，又仔细比较了两种目的。1用于疫苗研究开发的目的；2用于研究、诊断测试目的。　　

在3.2.4基因图案和序列标记一节中，指出新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒基因的NS1蛋白有219个氨基酸长度，而减毒活疫苗NS1蛋白只有126个氨基酸长度，暗示不是用于疫苗研究开发目的。又特别指出新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒的PB1-F2基因在类人识别标志12、58、88位置处，通过终止密码子被选择性覆盖，而这种覆盖造成的缺位与小鼠实验无毒性相关。通过终止密码子选择性覆盖，可能反映了（人为）选择的结果。强烈暗示新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒是一种实验实验室起源人造病毒，此病毒用于研究、诊断、测试目的。　　

出于可以理解的原因，说的比较含蓄，没有完全讲出心里话—具体到底用于什么研究、诊断测试目的？？？。不过，他能说这么多，也算是一个有正义感、有勇气之人，向他学习，致敬！今天，我们就捅破这层窗户纸，把他想说又没说的话说出来。　　

他在接受别人采访中说:“病毒可从实验室中溜出去，最近的一次是在英国，有一次大规模的口蹄疫爆发。这场灾难的起因就是英国一个安全严密的口蹄疫研究机构发生了泄露。有人把活的病毒从下水道中冲走了。病毒从下水道出去后传到了附近的牛的体内，最后传遍了英国，造成了数百万英镑的损失。”他在这里已说的非常透彻，只要稍有专业知识，用自己的头脑好好想想，就知道他其实暗示有人故意传播病毒！！

新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒是美国蓄谋已久，用于某种特定目的，而研究开发出来的人造实验室产物！具体这一次目的，就是美国把新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒在全球传播，制造一场全球大瘟疫，再通过世界卫生组织（WHO）不断制造恐怖气氛，再通过掌握的媒体配合鼓吹，诱骗全世界的人都来打疫苗，做给中国人看。趁机在发往中国的毒株中做手脚，对中国下毒手，结合其它手段，让中国灭种亡国！！！　　

3.4 对萨斯及禽流感的分析　　

现在回过头来看，一切都那么清晰、明了。2003春，爆发伊拉克战争的同时，在中国香港、广东爆发了萨斯（Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromes），搞得人心惶惶；后来又发生了禽流感，搞得也挺恐慌的。这很有可能就是美国搞的一次火力侦察。借此机会，摸清了中国的学术、医疗水平及疫病防控决策执行监控机构、流程、人员，以便为这一次针对中国的世纪大骗局做好周密准备。美国上层熟知“知己知彼，百战不殆”这条战争规律，中国对美国的又有多少了解？2003萨斯之后的几年内，方舟子撰文《如何看待中药的毒性》、《谁说中医不是骗人的？》、《就这样慢慢被毒死》，希望彻底否定中医中药，中医中药自身也存在问题，但他打着科学的旗号，意图将中医中药一棍子打死。当疫情来临时，意图让他人选择疫苗，而非中药。这背后隐藏着……?

4 美国正在实施这场针对中国的大骗局　　

4.1 世卫组织与“圣贤”（SAGE）“战略咨询专家小组”　　

世卫组织的陈冯富珍总干事于2009年6月11日宣布了最高级——第六级“流行病紧急状态”，原因是H1N1流感的扩散。让人很好奇的是，当她宣布六级警报的时候，她说，“目前的证据表明，绝大多数病人的症状很温和，通常在没有治疗的条件下可以迅速彻底康复。” 她还说，“在全世界范围内死亡的人数很少。我们并不预期重症或者致命病例数量会突然大量增加。”　　

我们事后得知，世卫组织内部对此有白热化的争论。陈冯富珍是根据“圣贤”（SAGE）“战略咨询专家小组”的建议而行动的，组里当时有一位专家，正是“流感博士”欧斯特豪思医生，现在他还是。　　

诱导了恐慌的世卫组织在宣布 “流行病紧急状态”时，欧斯特豪思是它的最关键的推手。不仅如此，他还是最重要的那个私人的“欧洲流感科学工作小组”（ESWI） 的主席，那个小组给自己的定位是“对流感提供多学科的关键性评价”的领导者，以“抗击传染病和大流行性感冒为目标”。按照他们自己的说法，这个由欧斯特豪 思领导的“欧洲流感科学工作小组”是一个连接枢纽，把“在日内瓦的世界卫生组织、在柏林的罗伯特·科赫的研究所和美国的康涅狄格大学”连接在一起。　　

更重要的是，这个“欧洲流感科学工作小组”（ESWI）的全部经费，都来自制药业黑手党——制药巨头公司，全球各国政府在世卫组织宣布进入“流行病紧急状态”时，不得不大批购买和储藏它们生产的疫苗，因此正是它们在紧急状态中闷声大发横财。在“欧洲流感科学工作小组”（ESWI）的资金资助者中，包括H1N1疫苗的生产者诺华制药，“达菲”的销售商霍夫曼－勒－罗氏公司、百特疫苗（厂）、MedImmune、葛兰素史克、赛诺菲巴斯德（Sanofi Pasteur），等等。
     我们必须看清，就是这个领衔全球的病毒学家、英国和荷兰的政府顾问、鹿特丹伊拉兹马斯医学院的欧斯特豪思博士，同时还当着世卫组织的专家咨询小组专家，还是制药公司全额资助的ESWI的主席，就是他力主采取巨大的行动，给全世界都注射疫苗，抵抗他们所说的和1918年西班牙大流感同样凶险的大流感。
      华尔街银行——JP摩根，是这样估计的：世卫组织决定宣布流行病紧急状态的最大的结果是，赞助欧斯特豪思的那些制药巨头的利润，规模可以达到75～100亿欧元　　

世卫组织的“圣贤”专家咨询小组还有一位成员是弗里德里希·海顿博士，他同时服务于英国的“服务者信托基金”（Wellcom Trust）。据传说，他是欧斯特豪思的密友，他同时也为罗氏公司、葛兰素史克公司提供有偿的“咨询服务”，那不就是生产H1N1疫苗的公司吗？　　

任世卫组织“圣贤”专家咨询小组成员的是另一位英国科学家、英国卫生部的大卫·萨力斯伯里教授，他同时还领导着世卫组织的甲流咨询小组。萨力斯伯里是制药业的坚定的捍卫者。英国健康市民组织“点击”（One Click）曾经指责他掩盖疫苗接种和婴儿自闭症发生率急剧上升之间的关联，还指责他掩盖疫苗“Gardasil”导致瘫痪甚至死亡的事情。　　

在这一切发生后，2009年9月28日，这位萨力斯伯里说，“科学界的观点非常明确，添加硫柳汞没有任何风险。”在英国用于H1N1流感的疫苗绝大部分是葛兰素史克生产的，其中起保鲜作用的汞制剂，正是硫柳汞。在美国，由于发现硫柳汞可能导致儿童自闭症，美国儿科学会和美国公共卫生署在1999年已经提出，把这种成分从疫苗中剔除掉。　　

在世卫组织中还有一位“圣贤”专家咨询组成员，阿诺德.芒托博士，他也是疫苗生产者MedImmune、葛兰素史克和ViroPharma公司付费的咨询专家，所以他也在从自己为世卫组织提出的建议中赚钱。　　

事情到这里 还没有完，“圣贤”专家咨询组的“独立”科学家们开会时，到会的还有“观察员”，这些观察员都是疫苗生产者：葛兰素史克公司、诺华制药公司、百特公司的 人！我们是否应该问一下，“圣贤”专家咨询组是否是流感的真正的全球领军科学家，他们开会为何要请疫苗生产者前来？　　

十年来，世卫组织为了自己手中有更多可用的钱，开创了一种“公－私伙伴”新关系。世卫组织现在不仅从联合国会员国得到会费——这是最初的安排，这个机构今天还收取各种研究资助和资金支持，其数量是联合国拨的常规经费的两倍还要多，全是来自私营企业。什么企业呢？就是那些能够从2009年H1N1流行病紧急状态决定中受益的那些企业。作为世卫组织的资助者，这些制药业黑手党在日内瓦可以享受到“开放式红地毯的待遇”。
     流行病学家汤姆·杰弗逊博士（服务于对流感研究进行独立的科学评估的“柯克兰协会”），在接受德国《明镜》周刊采访的时候指出，世卫组织私营化和卫生事业商业化的真实含义：“ 此次流感最大特征之一，同时也是整个大流感传奇最特别的地方，就是有人在年复一年地做出预测，而且预测一年比一年更严重。可是至今什么也没有发生，但是那些人还是在那里发布他们的预测。比如说，可能会让一切人都致命的那个禽流感，到底带来了什么？什么也没有。可是这还不能让那些发布预测的人罢手。有时候你会感觉到，整个行业在那里等着流行病爆发。”　　

《明镜》：你指的是谁？是世界卫生组织吗？　　

杰弗逊：世界卫生组织和公共卫生官员、病毒学家和制药公司。他们围绕所谓正在迫近的流行病，把一台机器开动起来。在这里要涉及好多的金钱，名望，个人仕途，还有整个体系！他们所需要的只是一种病毒发生变异，机器马上就可以启动和运转……”（注18）　　

当被问到世界卫生组织是否为了创造出一个巨大的H1N1疫苗市场，而刻意宣布流行病紧急状态时，杰弗逊回答说：　　

难道你不认为有一个值得注意的地方：事实上WHO改变了它对流行病的定义？过去的定义是出现一种新的病毒，发生了迅速的传播，人体还没有免疫力，并且造成了大量发病和大量死亡。现在后面的两条被去掉了，猪流感就这么变成了大流行病了。（注19）　　

世界卫生组织不早不晚，恰好在2009年4月发布了新的“疾病大流行”定义，刚好能够让它的“圣贤”专家咨询组以及“流感博士”欧斯特豪斯和大卫·萨力斯伯里他们，非常方便地利用本质上很温和的猪流感——甲型H1N1流感，宣布了大流感紧急状态。（注20）　　

《华盛顿邮报》12月8日在一篇文章中，对全世界H1N1甲型流感的严重性（或者说缺失的严重性）的一个注脚中这样报告：“美国H1N1传染的第二波过去了，著名流行病学家们正在预测，这次大流行最终可能被列为自从现代医学开始记录流感以来最温和的一次爆发。”(注21)
      俄罗斯议员、国家杜马主席伊戈尔·巴林诺向俄罗斯驻世界卫生组织的代表发出指示，要求对越来越明显的世卫组织和制药巨头之间的大规模腐败提起一项正式调查。巴林诺说：“对世卫组织内部的严重腐败提出了大量严重的指控。需要立即组成国际性的调查委员会。”（注22）　　

4.2 欧洲议会将调查世卫组织及“大流行病警报”丑闻 　　

   欧洲理事会卫生委员会主席、德国籍流行病学专家沃尔夫冈·沃达格宣称，这场被夸大的甲流疫情其实是“本世纪最大的医学丑闻之一”。 沃达格说:“在我们眼前，其实只有轻微的流感和一场造假的疫情。　　

欧洲议会卫生委员会全票通过了一项决议，清查制药业巨头对发动“猪流感”全球战役所施加的影响，特别是对WHO施加的影响。这是针对WHO、制药巨头和学术界的无良科学家这个“地球金三角”的医药腐败早就应该采取的、已拖延了太久的行动。他们造成了千百万人民的永久性健康伤害，甚至造成了不应有的死亡。　　

此次欧洲议会行动的推动者是沃尔夫岗·沃达格，前任德国联邦议院的社会民主党议员，现任欧洲议会卫生委员会主席。沃达格是医生、流行病学家、肺病专家、环境医药专家，他认为目前的所谓“大流行病”是“最大的世纪医药丑闻”。决议文本经由足够多欧洲议会成员通过，其中有这样的陈述：“制药公司为了推广它们治疗感冒的专利药品和疫苗，向负责公共卫生的科学家和政府官员施加影响，向全世界的政府发出警报，迫使它们把有限的医药卫生资源浪费在无效的疫苗上，把千百万健康的人们暴露在无人知晓的疫苗副作用的风险面前。那些疫苗并未经充分检验，而且接种疫苗是毫无必要的。2005-06年的‘禽流感’和当前的‘猪流感’一起，已经造成的巨大的伤害，不仅涉及由于接种疫苗而致病的人，不仅浪费了公共卫生资金，还破坏了重要的国际卫生机构的公信度”。　　

欧洲议会将要调查的，就是“伪造的大流行病”，即WHO根据其医学专家“圣贤”咨询组（SAGE）的意见，于2009年7月宣布的“最高级流行病警报”。世卫组织的“专家小组”许多成员在葛兰素史克、罗氏制药、诺华等公司有重大经济利益，并且被记录在案。他们正在从这些公司推出的药品和未经检验的H1N1疫苗中获取私人利益。欧洲议会将要调查在发动全球范围的所谓“H5N1”禽流感和“H1N1”猪流感行动中，这些制药公司曾经施加了何种影响。这项调查在欧洲议会全体大会上将被赋予“紧急行动”的优先地位。　　

沃达格在他的正式陈述中，批评了制药业对WHO官员施加的影响和导致的后果，使得“千百万健康的人被暴露在草率制造出来的疫苗风险面前”，而实际上这场流感远比以往的一切流行性感冒都“更轻微”。　　

沃达格说，WHO在七月宣布最高级警报中所应承担的责任，是欧洲议会此次调查中最大的重点。当墨西哥在2009年4月报告发病的情况之后，WHO有史以来第一次修订了大流行病定义，把发病的人数而不是疾病的实际危险作为发布“大流行病警报”的依据。当猪流感被宣布为“大流行病”后，各国被迫启动应对措施，并且要去购买猪流感疫苗。沃达格提出，由于WHO不受任何议会的控制，所以各国政府必须坚持对它的公信度要求。这项调查还将涉及两家重要的德国机构，即发布流行病指导手册的机构：保罗-欧利希所在的机构，他曾经获得诺贝尔生理暨医学奖，还有一个是罗伯特· 科赫研究所。　　

欧盟官员称甲流疫情是世纪骗局 制药公司制造恐慌牟取暴利（2010.1.13）。就在这关键时刻，百度在美域名被非法篡改，GOOGLE扬言退出中国，希拉里亲自出马……，狠狠的吓唬了中国人一下。成功地将中国高层领导及国民的注意力从甲流疫情是世纪骗局这个大话题，转移到网络安全及GOOGLE事件上来，与此同时,火速摆平了欧洲议会卫生委员会,美帝的危机处理做又快又到位！！！时至今日（2010-03-27），二个多月过去了，沃达格宣称的世纪大骗局甲流疫情的调查再没有下文了......!!！　　

4.3  Leonard G. Horowitz博士的分析 　　

Leonard G. Horowitz,  牙医学博士，文科硕士，公共卫生硕士，是在公共卫生，行为科学,，新出现病和生物恐怖主义重叠领域的国际知名权威。他在1977年获得塔夫茨大学牙科学院牙科医学博士学位，又获得美国罗切斯特大学行为科学博士后奖学金，获得哈佛大学公共卫生硕士学位，获得遵理学院健康教育文科硕士,在加入美国哈佛大学研究机构前, Horowitz博士已出名,因为他的畅销书，新出现病毒：艾滋病和埃博拉病毒，自然，事故或故意？Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? ( 纽约时报书评拒绝对此评论 )　　

Los Angeles, CA— World leading drug-industry investigators have uncovered stunning documents proving an international drug ring, operating from New York City, is behind the H1N1 swine flu fright and vaccination preparations. Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, America’s leading consumer health expert, and Sherri Kane, an investigative journalist, have released shocking proof in legal affidavits that leaders of a private global biotechnology “trust” are behind everything you ever heard about pandemic flu, including its origin and alleged prevention via vaccination. Their documents, being sent through attorneys to the FBI today, evidence powerful industrialists operating a crime ring within “Partnership for New York City” are behind the pandemic’s creation, media persuasions, vaccination preparations, and health official promotions seen everywhere from supermarkets to health clinics.
  “David Rockefeller’s trust, that engages several powerful partners on Wall Street, including media moguls Rupert Murdock, Morton Zuckerman, Thomas Glocer, and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Jerry Speyer,” are implicated in advancing global genocide,” Dr. Horowitz wrote to FBI directors, through a team of attorneys assembled to stop the swine flu vaccines from being given.
“This ‘partnership’ controls biotechnology research and development globally. Health commerce internationally is also controlled virtually entirely by this trust that exercises near complete control over mainstream media to promote/propagandize its products and services for the drug cartel's organized crime. This trust, in essence, makes or breaks medical and natural healing markets, primarily through the mass media companies and propaganda it wields for social engineering and market building,” Dr. Horowitz wrote.
    洛杉矶，加州，世界领先的医药产业调查者已发现一个令人震惊的文件，证明一个国际药业圈子，在纽约市操作，是H1N1猪流感惊吓和疫苗准备的幕后者。
Leonard G. Horowitz博士，美国领先的消费者健康专家，雪莉凯恩，一名调查记者，已经在法律宣誓书中发布了惊人的证据，在那个的私人全球生物技术“托拉斯” 首领是你曾听到过的关于流感的所有事情，包括它的起源及宣称通过疫苗预防，的幕后者。他们的文件，今天正通过律师向联邦调查局递交，表明强力的多个产业在“纽约市伙伴关系”内部操作一个犯罪团伙，是流行病的制造，媒体劝告，疫苗接种的准备，及从超市到诊所到处可见的卫生官员促销，的幕后者。　　

大卫洛克菲勒基金会，拥有几个华尔街的强大伙伴，，包括传媒巨头鲁珀特默多克，莫顿朱克曼，托马斯格罗瑟，以及纽约联邦储备银行的董事会前主席Jerry Speyer，和正在推进的全球种族灭绝有牵连，Horowitz博士通过律师团写信给联邦调查局主任，以便停止即将开始的猪流感H1N1疫苗接种。  
“这个'伙伴关系'控制了全球生物技术研究和开发。国际健康产业也几乎完全被这个托拉斯控制，它们的活动几乎控制了主流媒体，以促进/宣传它们的产品和服务，以便实施药品集团的有组织犯罪。这个托拉斯，在本质上构成或破坏医疗和自然愈合的市场,主要是通过大众媒体公司和宣传运用社会工程和市场建设”Horowitz博士写道。 　　

I understand that substantial historical evidence exists proving unequivocally the Rockefeller family’s monopolistic influence over American medicine and public health that is material to this affidavit and related complaint. David Rockefeller’s powerful influence over the Council on Foreign Relations, geopolitics, and global economics is solidly established。我理解实质上的历史证据存在证明：洛克菲勒家族对美国医药及公共健康具有明确的决定性影响。所有这些对这个书面陈述及相关控诉是资料。大卫洛克菲勒对外交关系委员会、地缘政治、全球经济的强大影响力是坚定存在的。
    It is a well-established fact that “outbreaks” have been caused by laboratory “accidents.” For instance, the 1977 Influenza A outbreak of human (“swine   flu”) H1N1 that went extinct for twenty years between 1957 and 1977 suddenly re-emerged immediately following: a. the suspicious unexplained 1976 military  outbreak at Fort Dix, New Jersey of this strain that was most likely a covert military experiment; and b. the subsequent swine flu deadly vaccination program that followed the Fort Dix outbreak, and media-driven fright; that has been attributed to a “laboratory source” according to doctors Zimmer and Burke in the New England Journal of Medicine (July 16, 2009;Vol.361:279-285).一个既定事实是，“爆发”可由实验室“意外”造成。例如，1977年流感爆发，这钟人类（“猪流感”）H1N1病毒从1957年至1977年灭绝了二十年，突然又重新出现：a. 1976年不明的可疑的新泽西州迪克斯堡军队爆发毒株，很有可能是一场秘密军事实验；b:随后致命的猪流感疫苗计划，在迪克斯堡爆发和媒体驱动惊吓后，这已被归咎于“实验室来源”，据医生Zimmer和Burke在新英格兰医学杂志介绍（09年7月16日;卷.361:279-285）。 　　

   The November 1977 sudden reemergence of this Influenza A H1N1 strain in the former Soviet Union is best explained by the National Cancer Institute’s 1978 publication titled Special Virus Cancer Program (Library call number: E20.3152;V81/977 and 78-21195). This report revealed the June 15, 1976 contract (N01-CP-6-1047) with the American Type Culture Collection to supply “virus materials . . . to investigators throughout the world” via a “US-USSR Agreement” (a dangerous breach of Cold War national security). Virus materials cited in this document included numerous infectious agents including influenza, parainfluenza, and even laboratory recombinations of influenza with acute lymphocytic leukemia viruses that might spread quick acting lymphatic cancers by sneezing.在前苏联，1977年11月突然重新出现的流感A型H1N1病毒毒株，可以被美国国家癌症研究所的1978年出版物，标题为特别癌症病毒计划（图书馆查询号码：E20.3152;V81/977和78-21195）很好的解释。这份报告显示在1976年6月15号合同（N01 -CP- 6 – 1047）美国菌种保藏中心提供“病毒材料…，通过”美苏协定“到世界各地调查（冷战国家安全的危险破坏）。在这份文件中引述的病毒材料，包括众多的传染因子，例如流感，副流感，，甚至实验室重组流感病毒，如急性淋巴细胞白血病病毒，可通过打喷嚏迅速传播，导致淋巴癌症。　　

The April, 2009 “outbreak” of the H1N1 “swine flu” is, like the 1976 Fort Dix and 1977 general “outbreaks,” highly suspicious according to genetic analysts and leading virologists. The rapid mutation rates of the novel agent circulating and feared as the 2009 “swine flu” strongly suggests a laboratory source, either intentionally or accidentally released. 2009年4月“爆发的H1N1型”猪流感“，”就像1976年迪克斯堡和1977年的爆发，”高度可疑，根据遗传分析家和领先的病毒学家。正在传播的新物种快速突变率和恐惧，2009年“猪流感”强烈暗示一个实验室的来源，不管是有意或无意地释放。 　　

   Thus, it is certain that when the Mexican Swine Flu 2009 “outbreak” occurred in mid April, 2009, first in the United States in two unrelated children living approximately 100 miles apart in southern California, then soon after in Mexico among people who had not been exposed to these two children, that foul play is a most reasonable explanation, especially since this unique virus held genes from avian, swine, Spanish, and regular flu strains—unprecedented in the history of “natural selection” health science addressing evolution of the species.  可以肯定，2009墨西哥猪流感“爆发”，发生在2009年四月中旬。首先在美国,两个不相干的孩子,生活在加利福尼亚州南部相互距离约100英里外，然后不久在墨西哥人群中,谁没有接触过这两个孩子。预谋犯罪是最合理解释，特别是因为这种独特病毒拥有从禽流感, 猪流感, 西班牙,普通流感病毒而来的基因-史无前例在“自然选择” 历史上，真（而非伪）科学所描述的物种演变。　　

Gross criminal neglect of common sense and reasoned analysis regarding the epidemiological tracking of the 2009 H1N1 flu outbreak’s origin; purposefully evading substantial evidence that the current pandemic virus appeared suddenly, suspiciously, unnaturally, and immediately following companies in the PNYC trust issuing vaccine sales propaganda.忽视常识和理性分析关于2009H1N1流感爆发起源流行病学跟踪的严重犯罪疏忽;刻意回避大量证据，目前流行病毒突然出现，形迹可疑，不自然地，紧接着PNYC的垄断公司发放疫苗销售宣传。　　

以上文章见详见《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD G. HOROWITZ》LEONARD G. HOROWITZ的宣誓书（用于法庭做证）　　

One such threat, a possible H1N1 hemorrhagic pneumonia recombinant, has emerged in the Ukraine, where the Chernobyl disaster occurred. The NATO superpower has fully engaged biological and chemical weapons research and development. This country was predicted to host a biological weapons release associated with H1N1 vaccines courtesy of the Baxter Corp around the time this outbreak occurred. Joseph Moshe, an Israeli Mossad agent, made this prediction on August 11, 2009, and his persecution and arrest made the national news.一个这样的威胁，可能的H1N1出血性肺炎病毒重组，已经出现在乌克兰，切尔诺贝利灾难发生在该国。北约超级力量充分参与生物和化学武器的研究发展。这次爆发时，这个国家是被预测组织一场生物武器释放，和百特公司提供H1N1病毒疫苗相关联。Joseph Moshe，以色列(即犹太人笔者注)摩萨德特工，2009年8月11日做了这个预言，他的迫害和逮捕成为全国性新闻。　　

以上文章详见《Vaccine Victims Blamed For National Emergency -Smoking Guns Indict Murdoch's Media in Deadly Corruption》疫苗受害者谴责国家紧急状态-烟雾弹表明默多克媒体的致命腐败　　

4.4 制备毒株”NYMCX-179A”来自美国 　　

昨晚8点，甲型H1N1流感疫苗生产用毒株NYMCX-179A运抵北京科兴生物制品有限公司，科研人员迅速激活毒株种子批制备工作，这标志着甲型H1N1疫苗的批量生产正式激活。此前，北京科兴成功生产出我国第一支甲型肝灭活疫苗、禽流感疫苗和SARS疫苗。当天下午1：40，自美国CDC发往北京的甲型H1N1流感疫苗生产用毒株”NYMCX-179A”运抵首都国际机场。在国家应对甲型H1N1流感联防联控保障组、海关总署和国家质检总局等部门的协助下，毒株于20:00顺利送抵北京科兴。据了解，在疫情出现后，美国CDC迅速分离得到了毒株，并于4月16-17日将3株毒株发往了WHO 的联合实验室用于制备疫苗生产用毒株。位于美国纽约医学院(NYMC)的实验室在5月中旬完成了疫苗生产用毒种的制备，并将制备完成的毒株发往美国CDC 进行安全性评价。美国CDC在对这些毒株进行全面评价后，向各疫苗生产厂家分发。 (2009.6.9)　　

最关键致命的一点是中国制备疫苗所采用的毒株NYMCX-179A来自美国纽约医学院(NYMC)的实验室.美国非常非常可能在其中玩了两面阴谋,在美国制备疫苗所采用的毒株NYMCX-179A,是真正的NYMCX-179A.而运往中国的”NYMCX-179A”是假的, 不是真正的NYMCX-179A,内含某种恶性的病毒!!　　

4.5 100天的甲流疫苗安全系数有多高？  　　

本次临床试验采取单中心、随机双盲对照设计，于２００９年７月２２日在北京市怀柔区启动。现场接种工作于８月１５日顺利完成，共有１６１４名３岁以上的受试者完成疫苗接种及０、１４和２１天的血样采集，中国药品生物制品检定所完成了全部血清的血凝抑制抗体（ＨＩ抗体）检测。 本次临床试验由中国疾控中心组织，北京市疾控中心承担。北京科兴生物制品有限公司１８日宣布，其生产的甲型Ｈ１Ｎ１流感疫苗临床试验完成，初步结果显示疫苗对人体安全有效。分析结果显示，临床试验用疫苗在接种一针后可产生良好的免疫反应，保护性抗体阳性率、抗体阳转率等指标均达到疫苗评价标准，表明接种疫苗可以对人体产生保护。北京科兴公司总经理尹卫东同时表示，北京市有１６００余名志愿者参与了此项研究，志愿者们的积极参与推动和保证了这项科研的顺利进行，也为今后成千上万的人接种甲型Ｈ１Ｎ１流感疫苗提供了安全性和有效性的数据。“甲型Ｈ１Ｎ１流感疫苗能够早日投入使用，志愿者们功不可没。” (８.１８)　　

昨天上午10时30分，国家食品药品监管局通报，9月3日已批准北京科兴生物制品有限公司研制的甲型H1N1流感疫苗获得药品注册。药监局注册司司长张伟介绍，根据疫情发展和国家对甲流疫苗的应急储备资源配置，将首先用于易遭H1N1侵袭的重点人群接种免疫。昨日中午1时，北京科兴生物制品有限公司的疫苗生产线上，2人用剂量，30μg/1.0ml/瓶的甲型H1N1流感疫苗开始灌装下线，每个最小包装上，都清晰印有“国药准字S20090012”，以及问世名称“盼尔来福.1”。这是全球首支获得国家(或地区政府)药品批准文号的甲型H1N1流感疫苗。从企业6月8日获得可直接用于疫苗生产的毒株算起，整个疫苗研制周期仅用了短短87天。(2009.9. 4)  　　

出镜主持：董倩  出镜专家：****流行病学首席科学家Z*  主持人：最后一个关于疫苗的问题。比如说像我们这种青壮年，因为刚才您说了有一个优先人群，那么在优先人群里面，大家也有一个担心，就是疫苗安全系数到底有多高，有的人在种和不种之间还犹豫，您的主张是什么？Z*：我再把刚才那句话补充一下。我们国家做疫苗观察的时候，是3岁以上的人群做的观察，3岁以下的，我们因为没有这种实验数据所以没有推广下去。但是（3岁）以上的人群接种了，我觉得对（3岁）以下的人群也是一个保护。主持人：种，安全吗？Z*：种，我觉得是这样的。实际上最担心安全的是我们，还不是普通老百姓。为什么？因为我们帮着全国老百姓把安全关的，我们要参加疫苗审评的。我们当时提出了很多建议，对厂家疫苗的安全性，我们挑剔是非常苛刻的。主持人：就您的监督，您感觉……Z*：我觉得现在可以说是，第一个，我们觉得从原理上来看，它生产过程尽量采用过去成熟的工艺，比如说对过敏源的提取是什么，我觉得技术是成熟的。主持人：换句话说是足够安全的？Z*：对。第二是什么？就是通过13000人的实验，是安全的。最后，中国现在已经大规模的接种了，几十万、上百万人群接种都是安全的，这个是最主要的因素。以上对话来自( 2009.10.29)从上面对话可以看出公众对疫苗安全心存疑虑, 而****流行病学的首席科学家Z*对此回答老是什么觉得,觉得的.

上海于2009年10月15日起开展了大规模对重点人群的甲流疫苗接种工作；11月初，北京中小学、大学（所谓的重点人群）开始接种，11月16日是北京户籍居民免费接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗的第一天；其它各地也在11月初开始接种。6月8日,甲型H1N1流感疫苗生产用毒株NYMCX-179A自美国运抵中国,立即开始制备疫苗。 ７月２２日, 由中国疾控中心组织(北京市疾控中心承担),在北京市怀柔区发动１６１４名志愿者开始作临床试验,到****流行病学首席科学家Z* 在**TV 的10.29讲话才仅仅100天。这对于一个严格的疫苗实验来说是远远不够的!!!　　

HIV/AIDS艾滋病急性感染期为6个星期，无症状感染期为6个月至10年以上,此期与健康人无明显区别，艾滋病前期才会出现明显症状(<<中国艾滋病调查>>P230,高耀洁著,广西师范大学出版社,2005年5月第一版)，此时距人体感染HIV至少有7个月又2个星期。

如果美国運往中国”NYMCX-179A” 毒株,实际上是类似于HIV这样,有12个月潜伏期的恶性病毒,100天的疫苗实验期是远远不够的.这就是问题关键所在。　　

4.6 奥巴马赤膊上阵　　

美国为了让中国钻入精心设置的圈套, 奥巴马不惜赤膊上阵。　　

WHO还用鲜为人知的方式操作对这场流行病的控制――它把谣传的患病人数中死亡病例的统计数字重复使用，借此渲染事态的严重性，用来恐吓怀孕的妇女、儿童们的家长和所有的人。根据WHO于2009年9月底的数字，死于甲流或者猪流感的人数，一共是3917人。既使是WHO和美国政府的疾病控制中心也不得不承认，在绝大多数病例中，死亡患者如不是早先已患有呼吸系统疾病，就是患有其他重症。它们直到现在都从来没有提供过最起码的证据，证明那些病人死亡的原因不是先前患有的其他重症疾病，而是甲流，而他们患上甲流其实是偶然事件，流行病学家把它叫做“机会感染”。事情还没完，更有意思的是，我们看到，WHO竟然把流感死亡人数和肺炎死亡人数“结合”在一起了。肺炎是一种完全不同的常见疾病，死亡率比流感高很多；在疾病分类上有一个“流感与肺炎”项目（J09－J18）。　　

    10月23日，世卫组织估计，全球已有大约5000人死于今年的甲型H1N1流感。就在同一天，美国疾控中心也估计，美国死于这种新流感的人数已经突破了1000人。美国总统奥巴马于这一天公告，宣布美国进入甲型H1N1流感全国紧急状态，公告发出后，争相注射甲型H1N1流感疫苗的场面出现在美国各大州。(2009.10.29) 注意, 美国疾控中心估计美国死于这种新流感的人数已经突破了1000人,这条新闻中死亡数字非常非常可能是夸大的。2008年西藏3.14事件中CNN的拙劣表演,想必大家还没有忘记吧。　　

上海于2009年10月15日起开展了大规模对重点人群的甲流疫苗接种工作；11月初，北京中小学、大学（所谓的重点人群）开始接种，11月16日是北京户籍居民免费接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗的第一天；其它各地也在11月初开始接种。　　

奥巴马两女儿接种甲流疫苗 大批美国人等待疫苗 (2009.10.29)　　

然而与此同时另一个现实也骤然凸现在美国人的面前，那就是疫苗短缺。《纽约时报》的专栏作家苏姗•多米尼斯曾在本月初就打电话给儿科医生，为儿子预约注射疫苗，然而被告知将需要等三周到一个月才能确定时间。(2009.10.29)　　

中国****部已明确指出，甲流疫苗供应能力不足是一个全球性的问题，我国的接种策略是优先在重点地区和重点人群中接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗，经测算，全国重点人群总数约为3.9亿人。（2009.11.04   ****经济报道 ）*州市疾病预防控制中心对消防支队接种疫苗的申请非常重视，在甲型H1N1流感疫苗非常紧缺的情况下，特批部分疫苗，由**区区直机关医院负责为支队全体人员接种。　　

以上这一点完全可能是一个骗局.Evidencing this group's power, on October 16, 2009, a special gathering of CFR joined vaccine specialists and social engineers led by health media propagandist, Laurie Garrett, discussed the urgency of the vast majority rejecting vaccinations for H1N1. They articulated the need to use "shortage marketing" (i.e., fraudulently claiming vaccine shortages) to promote better public acceptance of the distrusted vaccines. Prior to this meeting, the nation's vaccine supplies were reported ample. After this meeting the media began administering shortage marketing, and hypnotizing the panicked public who lined up for their shots. (www.rense.com  Vaccine Victims Blamed For National Emergency  Smoking Guns Indict Murdoch's Media in Deadly Corruption  By Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz)证明这一群体的力量，在09年10月16日，外交关系委员会的一个特别聚会加入了疫苗专家们和健康媒体宣传家Laurie Garrett领导的社会工程师们，讨论了关于公众中大部分人拒绝H1N1疫苗接种的紧急情况。他们阐明了需要使用“短缺市场”（即欺骗性声称疫苗短缺），以更好的促进公众接受已不被信任的疫苗。在这次会议之前，国家疫苗供应被报告是充足。在这次会议后，媒体开始说疫苗市场短缺，被催眠的恐慌市民排队来注射疫苗。　　

4.7 美国骗术成功　　

      上海于2009年10月15日起开展了大规模对重点人群的甲流疫苗接种工作；11月初，北京中小学、大学（所谓的重点人群）开始接种，11月16日是北京户籍居民免费接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗的第一天；其它各地也在11月初开始接种。　　

本周稍早，世卫组织战略咨询专家组(SAGE)对甲流疫苗进行了研究分析。“SAGE审查了病患接种疫苗后的初步监控报告，未发现不良反应迹象，”世卫发表声明称。“我们注意到接种後出现一些不良反应，但接种普通流感疫苗也会有同样症状，众所周知后者的安全性是相当高的，”声明称。(世卫组织称疫苗安全有效2009.11.3)　　

被SAGE影响,操纵的世卫组织匆忙跳出来说甲流疫苗安全有效,动机不简单!!! SAGE的后面是H1N1疫苗的生产者诺华制药，“达菲”的销售商霍夫曼－勒－罗氏公司、百特疫苗（厂）、MedImmune、葛兰素史克、赛诺菲巴斯德（Sanofi Pasteur），等等,这些又和美国上层势力有千丝万缕的关系。
     针对近段时间社会上出现的接种甲流疫苗会引发甲流病情的不实传言，北京市疾控中心昨天作出回应，今后还将根据社会需求，进一步扩大甲流疫苗免费接种人群的范围，相信通过实践的证明，谣言会不攻自破。(北京扩大接种范围  回击“不安全” 谣言 2009.11.6)　　

这一切非常可能是奥巴马背后的实际控制集团做给中国人看的。中国人太天真善良了，很有可能已上当受骗！！！昨天（11月16日）是北京户籍居民免费接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗的第一天，截至昨天（11月16日）下午4时许，全市402个指定疫苗接种点共为9000余人接种此疫苗。多个接种点透露，首日接种者多数为老年人。(2009.11.17)　　

中国国家食品药品监督管理局新闻发言人Y**，8日在北京重申，国内甲流疫苗接种后出现的4例死亡病例，与疫苗没有直接关系，疫苗是安全有效的。日前，中国卫生部通报说，中国共报告4例接种后死亡病例。经调查，3例已证实与疫苗接种无关，1例死因仍在调查当中。(在国家药监局当日举行的新闻发布会上，Y**说，中国药品监管部门对甲流疫苗研制严格审批，对生产过程严格监管(甲型H1N1流感疫苗生产用毒株NYMCX-179A来自美国,若美国在其中搞鬼, 生产过程越严格,越合美国人心意，不知Y**考虑过否？)并在每批疫苗上市前进行批签发检验。尽管疫苗的审评、审批是在短时间内完成的，但所有标准并没降低、程序也没减少（此标准程序是否为美国人制定？）。Y表示，目前为止，甲流疫苗的不良反应和季节性流感不良反应是一样的，还没有发现接种疫苗严重的不良反应，上市的甲流感疫苗是安全有效的。根据中国卫生部的统计，截至12月6日24时，中国累计为3020万人接种了甲流疫苗。( 2009.12.8 国家药监局重申甲流疫苗安全有效) 　　

2009．11.27上午，广东揭西县河婆镇人张国录陪妻子阿香，因阿香脚肿，到深圳宝安区沙井人民医院，。因夫妻有亲戚在医院工作，亲戚出于好心，问夫妻要不要打疫苗，夫妻都打了疫苗。14个小时后,次日零时许，张国录开始发烧，一直烧至上午10点多，返回沙井人民医院，医生安排吃退烧药；11.29晚，再次发烧，臀部开始发痒，“冒出棉签头大的肉包，软软的”；12.5，他全身开始肿胀变形，“头肿大得，张大嘴巴都塞不禁牙刷”，眼睛肿成一条峰，看不见眼珠；12.9开始在沙井人民医院住院；12.12转入深圳人民医院，……；12.31，转院到广州中山医科大学附属第二医院，全身开始蜕皮，“皮屑有成人指甲大”，直褪了三周才褪完；“换”了皮的张国录皮肤黑红紧绷，摸上去就象木板……；治疗一段时间，张开始皮开肉绽，形成一片片鳞片……；2月2日，已无法下地行走；2月5日，高烧至40.5°C，此后需借助氧气管呼吸，全身紧绷不能动，一动就象刀割一样……。究竟何因，目前还未有结论。其妻目前无事。(南方都市报A13版,2010年2月8日)此事为何拖延许久，才被报道出来？　　

 记者今天从广州市疾病预防控制中心独家获悉，该中心前段时间亦接到过数起疑因接种疫苗后出现病态及相关症状的报告。该中心立即组织相关疫苗专家及临床医生进行调查及论证，目前论证报告已报到广州市相关行政部门。论证报告提及，“有一些不能排除与接种疫苗有关”，但最后结果需待行政部门评估后再公布。近段时间，广州先后有两位家长向媒体反映自己的孩子在接种甲流疫苗后，身体出现严重不适。其中一名15岁少年发展到胸以下丧失知觉。另一名10岁儿童左腿无法站立行走。两位家长均表示，孩子以前身体一直很好，因此他们怀疑是“疫苗质量有问题”。 (2010-03-24羊城晚报报道)  　　

5 美国完全有这个能力实施这场大骗局　　

2003年春爆发了伊拉克战争，同时中国香港发生了禽流感。2006到2007年底，开始有人在网上说这是一场基因战争，我们觉的（就像中国疾控中心流行病学首席科学家**对甲流疫苗安全性问题采用觉的觉的一样），这是天方夜谭，是不是有点被迫害妄想症？再后来，看到官网，好象是新华网，登了消息，说印度尼西亚卫生部长出了一本书，说禽流感是美国搞的基因战争，美国对此大为LAO火，后来还收回了此书。这时候我们觉的，此事非同小可，开始关注。

2008年初看了一些文章，特别是仔细研究了Leonard G. Horowitz博士和美国Dr. Boyd Graves博士的文章，判断这非常可能是真的。　　

5.1 HIV/AIDS系人造病毒　　

5.1.1概述　　

2004年度诺贝尔和平奖得主、肯尼亚环境保护活动家旺加里·马塔伊2004年10月9日再次重申自己的判断。她说，艾滋病病毒是西方国家实验室故意制造出来的生物制剂。“有人说艾滋病病毒来自猴子，我表示怀疑，因为自远古以来我们就和猴子生活在一起，”马塔伊说。马塔伊在肯尼亚首都内罗毕举行的新闻发布会上说：“在这个星球上，与其它人种相比，死于艾滋病的黑人要多得多。事实上，这是一些人制造出来的制剂，以消灭另外一些人。如果没有那些人，就不必入侵伊拉克。”马塔伊补充说：“它（艾滋病病毒）是被科学家制造出来并用于生物战。”事实上，这并非马塔伊首次这么说。今年（2004年）8月，肯尼亚《旗帜报》在一篇报道中曾援引马塔伊的话说，艾滋病病毒是科学家研制出来用来大清洗的生物武器。但作为诺贝尔和平奖得主，马塔伊如今的表态显然更具分量。马塔伊1940年4月1日出生在肯尼亚的涅里。她早年在肯尼亚当地接受教育，后前往美国堪萨斯州的一所大学学习生物学，并在1964年获得生物学学士学位。1966年，她又在美国匹兹堡大学获得硕士学位。学成归国后，马塔伊在内罗毕大学从事兽医学的研究，并于1971年在那里获得博士学位，成为东非第一个获得博士学位的黑人女性。由于工作业绩突出，她1976年成为内罗毕大学和兽医学系的首位女系主任。　　

AIDS is undoubtedly “man-made.” We can now assert this “very apparent iatrogenic origin,” versus the “theoretic iatrogenic origin” of HIV/AIDS because of the rapidly increasing, now substantial, scientific support for this conclusion. Currently, international scientific consensus among leading investigators in this field, many of whose works and words are excerpted below, holds that HIV/AIDS originated from one or more extraordinary man-made, not natural, events dating back to the early to mid-1970s. Especially implicated in initiating the AIDS pandemic, according to many scientists and scholars, was the hepatitis B vaccine as detailed in the following pages.  Leonard G. Horowitz博士说：艾滋病无疑是“人为的。”我们现在可以断言艾滋病毒的“非常明显的医源性来源”而不是“医源性起源理论”，因为迅速增加的，现在实质性的科学的支持这一结论。目前，在这一领域国际领先科学调查人员之间的共识，其中许多人的作品和文字摘录如下，认为艾滋病毒/艾滋病起源于一个或多个特殊人为的，不是自然的事件，可追溯到70年代中期。特别是艾滋病流行起因表明，据许多科学家和学者，是B型肝炎疫苗，详情载于以下页面。　　

 Leonard G. Horowitz博士身份介绍见1.2,文章详见附录1《Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and the “Man-Made” Origin of HIV/AIDS 》　　

   5.1.2 时间，地点，人物，过程　　

美国在1962-1978启动了一个《Special Virus Cancer Program》（特殊癌症病毒项目），以便达到干掉特定人群的目的。

地点：Fort Detrick, Maryland 德瑞克堡，马里兰州，美国军方医学研究中心，细菌战剂在这里研究，美国的NCI（NATIONAL CANCER  INSTITUTE，国家癌症研究院）在此设有基地。

人物：项目同意者（Kissinger基辛格 ）项目管理者 Litton’s president, Roy Ash，利顿的医疗子公司Bionetics还为癌症研究和生物武器的发展，疫苗生产提供黑猩猩，猴子，猴子病毒，灵长类动物的细胞株。具体实施者 NCI项目主任 Robert Gallo博士（随后的白血病病毒HTLV-1,2（白血病病毒）和HIV - 1（艾滋病病毒）发现者）
   可能的过程： 将白血病（leukemia），淋巴瘤（lymphoma），及肉瘤病毒（sarcoma viruses）及乙型肝炎病毒HB，合成一种新病毒，首先在低等动物及黑猩猩上做实验，不断改进，使其性能提升，最后在非洲黑人和纽约的同性恋人身上以乙型肝炎病毒疫苗的名义做实验，最终传播到全球。　　

5.1.3  Dr. Gerald Myers(美国顶尖DNA序列分析家)的分析　　

Importantly, among the most respected of all HIV/AIDS origin theorists, the U.S. Government's chief DNA sequence analyst at the Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico , Dr. Gerald Myers, reported with his colleagues that the origin of HIV could not have begun with "cut hunters" or other single isolated cross species transmissions (called "zoonosis"). He reported that genetic sequencing studies prove some "punctuated origin of AIDS event" took place during the mid-1970s giving rise, virtually simultaneously, to at least ten different HIV "clades" (or genetic subtypes) associated with ten different distinguishable AIDS epidemics in Africa alone. The most likely cause of this widespread bizarre zoonosis was some man-made (i.e., iatrogenic) event involving chimpanzees. 　　

   Myers and his colleagues offered the following best explanation for the origin of HIV: "It is not far-fetched," they wrote, "to imagine the ten or so clades deriving from a single animal (perhaps immunosuppressed and possessing a swarm of variants) [as might have been the case with chimpanzees used in the process of hepatitis B vaccine manufacture] or from a few animals that might have belonged to a single troop or might have been gang-caged together. The number of animals required is secondary to the extent of variation in the source at the time of the zoonotic or iatrogenic event. The [vaccine] hypothesis makes a case for such a punctuated origin . . ." (See: Burr T, Hyman JM and Myers G. The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: Darwinian or Lamarchkian? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:877-887.) 　　

以上见<<The Origin of AIDS and HIV May Not Be What You Have Learned >>　　

5.1.4  铁证如山　　

Dr. Boyd Graves博士的铁证　　

The flowchart, discovered in 1999, from page 61 of the Progress Report #8 (1971) of the Special Virus Program of the United States of America。 Special Virus Cancer Program特殊癌症病毒项目流程图1999年被发现。用GOOGLE 搜索AIDS is MURDER!可见flowchart。这一点非常非常重要！！！　　

In January, the U.S. had no response to my two page abstract submitted to the African American AIDS 2000 conference. In February, the U.S. Congress had no response to the 3000 Americans who signed signature petitions calling for immediate review of the flowchart and progress reports of the secret virus development program. We firmly believe once the dust settles from the current election marathon, reviewing the special virus program will be the single most important pursuit of the 21st Century.今年1月，美国没有对我提交给2000年非洲裔艾滋病会议的两个页面摘要作出反应。今年2月，美国国会没有对，3000美国人签署的签名请愿要求对秘密病毒计划的流程图和研制进展报告立即审查，作出回应。我们坚信，一旦灰尘从目前的选举马拉松平息，审查特别病毒程序将是一个21世纪最重要的追求。
  The SVCP was speciously investigated in 2002 by the United States General Accounting Office (GAO-02-809R Origin of AIDS Virus), that concluded its fraudulent study in June 17, 2002. The investigation was forced by persecuted, and later incarcerated, Honorable Ohio Congressman, James A. Traficant, Jr. Mr. Traficant has decried his persecution by a “Jewish conspiracy” with intimate ties to Israel and intelligence organizations that adequately describes the defendants in this case.The SVCP是在2002年由美国审计总署（GAO - 02 - 809R艾滋病病毒的起源）似是而非地调查，在2002年6月17日完成了欺性研究。调查由受迫害，后来被监禁，尊敬的俄亥俄州众议员James A. Trafican推动，小非肯特先生谴责了一个“犹太人的阴谋，并与以色列和情报机构之间血肉联系”，这个案例充分说明了在这方面他的迫害。　　

以下是一些专业人士对此的评论　　

"JUST AS YOU, I BELIEVE THAT HIV-1 WAS A LABORATORY CREATION." -Professor Garth Nicolson, Institute for Molecular Medicine February 12, 2001　　

“正如你，我相信HIV - 1是实验室创造。”-加思尼科尔森教授，分子医学研究所，2001年2月12 　　

   Dr. Boyd Graves' research into the origin of the virus that causes AIDS, HIV, is important.  His efforts have led to the discovery of a flowchart, created by the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP), that clearly shows that the research efforts of moving leukemia, lymphoma, and sarcoma viruses from lower species into primate and human cells in a 15 year period (1962-1978) was not accidental.  Indeed, the flowchart reveals the systematic plan to examine many of these agents in the context of how, specifically, these agents would affect human immunology . . .Graves' research into the funding of the project, Piano laws associated with the project, and his dogged pursuit of answers from authorities in the field and their associated Piano agencies is unparalleled.  His legal actions to bring this matter to a head are important in that it will only be through legal means and subsequent Congressional review that this information will see the light of day. . . In this regard, then, Dr. Graves' efforts are at the core of finding the true origin of this global pandemic.
   Robert E. Lee, M.S., M.S.W., L.C.S.W. March 12, 2001; Author: AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time-Bomb-Dr. Bruce W. Halstead M.D. Director World Life Research Institute February 22, 2001　　

Boyd Graves博士对导致艾滋病，艾滋病毒的病毒起源研究，是重要的。他的努力导致流程图发现，特别病毒癌计划（SVCP），这清楚地表明了将白血病，淋巴瘤，肉瘤病毒从低等动物移动到灵长类和人类的细胞中15年期间（1962至78年）的研究工作，并不是偶然的。事实上，流程图显示了系统的计划，审查这些病毒如何，特别是，这些病毒如何影响人类免疫。Graves对项目的资金研究，Piano法律与该项目有关，他顽强追求答案，从该领域权威以及他们和Piano项目的联系，是无可比拟的。他的法律行动，使这件事浮出水面是重要的，因为它只能通过法律手段和随后的国会审查，此信息将看到曙光。在这方面，那么，Graves博士的努力是寻求这一全球性流行病真正来源的核心。　　

<艾滋病:生物定时炸弹的爆炸>Robert E. Lee，2001年3月12日；世界生命研究院主任Bruce W. Halstead M.D.博士2001年2月22日　　

“State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, the new book by author Boyd Ed Graves, relays his trials and tribulations as the lead plaintiff for the people against the forces that wield global genocide. Lawyer Graves is the lead investigator of the “Special Virus Cancer Program” flow chart. . . Give support and attention to these history making efforts.” 　　

-Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, author of "Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola Nature, Accident or Intentional?" 12.17.2000　　

Dr. Boyd Graves博士的详细文章用GOOGLE 搜索。　　

5.1.5  各方反应及结果　　

有一些人为了迷惑公众抛出了以下五种观点，Leonard G. Horowitz博士驳斥了这些种观点。　　

This may come as a surprise, or even quite a shock, to most people since the mainstream media and most respected medical journals have yet to herald the following knowledge. As a result most “authorities” still issue false and misleading claims such as: 1) “the HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination has been discussed, debated, and dismissed by an overwhelming majority of the HIV/AIDS research community;” 2) “People who claim that AIDS was man-made provide false information and hearsay;” 3) “It is sad that public attention and resources are diverted to attend to such unscientific dribble;” 4) “Man-made origin of AIDS vaccine proponents do severe damage to the public health community and vaccination efforts;” and 5) “Those that advance man-made theories of AIDS have financial motives,” as though there were no financial interests on the other side of the debate. 　　

还有一些人为了迷惑公众，抛出了HIV起源于1931，1959年被人发现，以便避开特别病毒癌症计划（SVCP）的启动年，1962。Leonard G. Horowitz博士驳斥了这种观点。　　

In the interest of facilitating progress on this issue, much publicity has been given to the notion that HIV was discovered in a 1959 blood sample from Leopoldville, Zaire;9 and that scientific consensus holds 1931 as the approximate date of HIV origination.7 These superstitions have led to common, yet false, declarations that HIV/AIDS originated well before the polio vaccination era and the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) that much evidence below links to the “punctuated origin” of AIDS. 　　

Especially relevant, when reflecting on the following facts, is the wisdom addressed by the late World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS czar, Dr. Jonathan Mann, whose life ended tragically on Flight 111 enroute to a European AIDS conference. “More than a medical scientific problem,” Dr. Mann said, “AIDS is a sociopolitical imposition.” 特别有关的，在下列事实反映，是由已故的处理世界卫生组织（WHO）艾滋病主任医生乔纳森曼，他的生命结束于不幸的飞往欧洲艾滋病会议111途中。 “超过一个医疗科学问题，”曼恩博士充满智慧地说，“艾滋病是一个社会政治强加于人。”　　

5.2  完全有能力搞出更结多更先进的病毒　　

美国能在1978年就搞出了HIV/AIDS，后来又有转基因大豆等,现在已是2009，美国完全有能力搞出更多更先进的病毒出来。

5.3  美国社会的上层构成　　

非典、禽流感、和猪流感的特效药都是一个药物—Tamiflu(特敏福,达菲)，达菲曾一度由罗氏（Roche）制药集团独家生产和销售。但专利掌握在美国加州吉利德科学公司(Gilead Sciences) 手中，罗氏公司需要向吉列德科技公司支付专利使用费，约占售价的五分之一。吉利德于1987年成立，拥有特敏福由1996至2016年二十年的专利权。从1988年到2001年，拉姆斯菲尔德（Donald Rumsfeld）一直在该公司董事会任职。1997至2001年间，为吉利德的董事会主席，直至2001年他从政后辞去了公司职务，加入布什（和石油财团洛克菲勒家族关系密却）政府担任国防部长一职。达菲既能是抗病毒药物，那肯定是在研究病毒的过程中发现的。但研究什么病毒？目的又是什么？也许永远都不会公开的！而罗氏（Roche）又非常可能掌握在犹太人罗斯柴尔德家族后代手中。　　

石油大王后代洛克菲勒家族对美国医药及公共健康具有明确的决定性影响；大卫·洛克菲勒任大通曼哈顿银行（Chase Manhattan Corporation）董事长总经理；基辛格和布热津斯基（Zbigniew Brzezinski）是大卫.洛克菲勒的心腹谋士；大卫洛克菲勒对外交关系委员会、地缘政治、全球经济拥有强大影响力。外交协会就是美国精英的“中央党校”。 洛克菲勒家族横跨石油医药银行外交四大领域。　　

Thomas H.Glocer 即是Thomson Reuters Corporation(路透社)首席执行官及董事，又是Merck（默克，世界制药、疫苗巨头）董事会成员。按西方法律，严重违背了利益冲突。　　

犹太势力与WASP及美国政界、军方的密切关系从上面几个例子就可以看出来，其实，这还仅仅是冰山一角。美国社会的上层，以犹太势力为首的利益集团联合一部分WASP(白种盎格鲁撒克逊新教徒)控制了制药行业，基因行业，新闻，金融，监管，CIA，政府，军工巨头，智库以及美国总统；他们内部形成盘根错接的关系网。详见《AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD G. HOROWITZ》、《Vaccine Victims Blamed For National Emergency》、《Why you can't get swine-flu vaccine》《货币战争》等文章。

5.4 综合以上　　

综合以上，美国完全有这个能力实施这场大骗局.　　

6 中国为何不能识破这场大骗局 　　

6.1 中国的内部及外部形势　　

  进入2008，特别是2009，中国内外部发生多起严重恶性事件，使决策层处于焦头烂额之境，疲于应付，严重干扰了决策层的注意力及精力！！！　　

6.2 中国官员及学术水平低下　　

丁学良此前说中国只有五个经济学家。中国购买美国1.2万亿房贷，已基本泡汤。　　

现在的中国，博士多如草，教授满街走，但其学术水平低下。　　

前不久逝世的钱学森说过：“中国没有一所大学，是按创新型人才培养模式来兴办”　　

死亡率：猪流感的死亡率为6.77%，比一般流感要高，其高致死率的主要原因有两个：一是病毒来势凶猛；二是民众起初对新疾病不重视，以为是普通感冒，很多人自己随便吃些药，错过了发病初72小时的最佳救治期。易感染人群：猪流感致死的患者年龄绝大多数在20岁至45岁之间，属于青壮年。防治疫苗：人类已研制出的所有流感疫苗对于猪流感都无效，但人感染猪流感是可防、可控、可治的。（2009.04.28 *网, 此网也算主流媒体）　　

猪流感死亡率为6.77%这条新闻,先后被**网，**网等国内主流媒体转载。让我们再看下面这条新闻，卫生部25日发布疫情通报称：上周(十一月十六日至二十二日)，内地三十一个省份报告甲型H1N1流感确诊病例九千七百三十三例，住院治疗三千一百零一例，死亡五十一人 (11.25,据**网, 此网算权威媒体) 。让我们来计算一下死亡率,约为0.5%(这其中可能包括一些基础病患者,平时就有一些重大疾病)；考虑到许多人没有去报告, 身体有点不舒服,过一二天就好了,对健康人而言, 感染H1N1死亡率我们大胆估计不会超过0.1%。可悲的是,中国至少有十几万医生,但没有人公开站出来,大声质疑猪流感死亡率为6.77%这条特大假新闻!!　　

笼统的说死亡率为6.77%，故意夸大死亡率，以便制造恐慌气氛，让人去注射疫苗。这是什么人？出于什么居心？炮制的假数字。国内没有专家站出来，指出这个夸大的死亡率。**网，**网还保留着死亡率为6.77%的说法。　　

还有人声称:得了普通流感,已好,但对H1N1不会产生抗体,还要注射H1N1疫苗。不知什么人，出于什么居心讲这种话。中国计划3.9亿人接种疫苗，如果实现这个目标，中国那就彻底完了！　　

高耀洁2005.5月出版了<<中国艾滋病调查>>，首先对她的作为表示最真挚的致敬。但遗憾的是她没有提到学术领域关于HIV/AIDS起源的巨大争论;<<医学免役学>>(2008年6月第5版,人民卫生出版社)在中国也算主流教科书,书中谈了AIDS/HIV,但也没有提HIV/AIDS起源的巨大争论，这一切显示中国人被蒙在鼓里，这是我们这个民族的悲哀!　　

我们对广东某医科大学研究生班作一小范围调查，没有一个听说过并仔细研究过HIV/AIDS起源的巨大争论!!这也不能怪他们。所用的教科书谈了AIDS/HIV,但没有提HIV/AIDS起源的巨大争论。　　

6.3 实验设备差　　

中国实验设备差,搞基因研究需要先进的设备，中国可能没有。　　

    广东华银集团属下广州华银医药科技有限公司研发生产的“甲、乙型流感病毒诊断试剂”4个产品，日前获得国家食品药品监督管理局颁发的产品注册证，一举填补国内流感诊断试剂国家注册的空白，成为国内唯一获得国家批准生产和上市的产品，对当前甲型H1N1流感病毒以及其他甲型流感病毒的防控有着重要意义。（2009.09.24）　　

　 罗氏始创于1896年，总部位于瑞士巴塞尔，在制药和诊断领域是世界领先的以研发为基础，以创新驱动的健康事业公司之一。作为全球最大的生物技术公司，药品和诊断，提供从早期发现、预防、诊断到治疗的创新产品与服务，从而提高了人类的健康水准和生活质量。罗氏诊断应用科学部从事病因方面的研究已有50余年，是全球研究疾病病因或隐患的试剂和系统的主要生产商，每年有100多种有利于医学科学进展和供商业使用的新产品、科研试剂和系统上市，为新技术的发展作出了显著的贡献。　　

2009猪源流感A型病毒(The swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus that appeared in 2009) ，首次在墨西哥人体内发现，是一个至少有三个父母的重配病毒。 最接近2009猪源流感A型病毒（甲流病毒）的MP基因，都来自于1999年左右从亚洲样本分离出'类禽流样'病毒；最接近的是A/swine/Hong Kong/5200/1999 (H3N2), A/swine/Hong Kong/51901999 (H3N2) and A/swine/Hong Kong/5212/1999 (H3N2)。也就是说，亚洲'类禽流样'病毒MP基因和甲流病毒MP基因非常接近。　　

一般而言，中国的企业很少掌握核心原材料及核心技术，干的大多是组装活。广州华银医药科技有限公司研发生产的“甲、乙型流感病毒诊断试剂”，它所采用的核心原材料是否从世界医药巨头瑞士罗氏Roche引进？这里面是否有鬼？诊断试剂将普通流感（'类禽流样'流感）故意误诊断为甲流，以增加致病率及死亡率，以达到恐慌效果？ 　　

6.4  美国对中国影响,渗透　　

      金融界有XXX，XXX；在AIDS/HIV，H1N1防控领域有谁？前些年，美国华裔学者何大一跑来中国推销他的“鸡尾酒疗法”，非常可能是想转移中国对HIV/AIDS真正起源的关注。其实，最初他们未必是真心愿意这么做，但在CIA的精心策划下，利用人性的弱点，使他们在泥潭中越陷越深，最终踏上不归路！　　

6.5  Z院士及Z*的言谈　　

中国工程院院士Z**在接受健康时报独家专访时指出：目前出现在墨西哥城的猪流感，对青壮年的威胁更大。Z院士指出：这是因为。越是年轻、体质强壮的人，身体的免疫功能越敏感，发挥的免疫能量就越高。猪流感一旦侵犯这样的人，其人体的免疫细胞就会迅速释放，因为免疫功能旺盛，一下子释放太多，就会破坏人体自身免疫细胞的平衡状态，对身体造成更大的伤害。(2009.5.16 青壮年为猪流感易感人群原因)　　

美国没并有禽流感疫情发生，但中国有，虽然禽流感暂时没有很大规模的人际传播，但禽流感病毒的毒性很强，具备高度的致死亡率（60%以上），而甲型H1N1虽然致死亡率很低，但是传染性很高，如果在中国广泛的扩散开来，谁也无法预料这两种病毒会不会发生基因突变，从而演变成一种既具高度传染性、又兼备高致死率的一种病毒，如果这种情况发生，对中国而言将是一种灾难。在甲流出现早期，广州中医药大学的一位专家就公布了一种治疗甲流的中药方，对此中药方的真正疗效，业界存在颇多争议，Z**院士表示，判断中药有没有效果，最好的办法是进行临床对比观察，对于两个甲流病例，一种使用中药，一种不用中药，从而对比观察中药真正的疗效，在没有做具体对比观察的情况下，妄自断言中药有没有效果是没有事实根据的。 (Z**：中药治甲流 没有事实依据  2009.6.22)　　

Z**对于疫苗大量接种发表了不同看法，“我觉得还需观望，疫苗安全性问题的观望时间还要更长一点。我们不能像1976年美国接种猪流感疫苗那样，疫情发生后疫苗仓促上阵，结果造成很多人生病甚至死亡。现在检测出疫苗打完后产生抗体，但它对再出现的疫情有没有帮助还不知道。我建议如果要大量接种疫苗，适当有一些试点比较妥当。”（Z**接种疫苗勿仓促上阵http://www.dayoo.com 2009.9.7 ）　　

“我觉得还需观望，疫苗安全性问题的观望时间还要更长一点。”Z**在接受媒体采访时表示，在大量接种疫苗之前，最好先适当进行一些试点，毕竟疫苗在临床还是存在一定比例的不良反应。（2009.11.2）　　

        Z**说，他之前对接种甲流疫苗态度慎重，是因为当时只有二三十万人接种疫苗，还需要进一步观察有无副作用，“目前，我国内地已有7个厂家生产甲流疫苗，接种疫苗的群体接近400万人，出现副作用的比例非常低，其中产生不良反应的有二三百人，产生严重过敏性休克的只有2人，副作用与普通流感疫苗相差无几。”Z**说，目前甲流第二波传播已经在北方地区出现，按照以往的规律，南方地区应该会在明年的一二月份进入第二波。而从疫情的发展来看，Z院士认为，学校是预防甲流的主要阵地，有必要在学校优先开展甲流疫苗接种。（ 2009.11.8）　　

Z**院士昨天表示,甲型H1N1流感病毒变异的可能性增大,中小学生应该尽快接种甲流疫苗。（2009.11.10）　　

18日下午接受了记者的采访Z**：“现在全国报告的甲流死亡病例数，我根本不信！”( 2009.11.20  Z**质疑国内甲流死亡数据)　　

对于Z**指出不信目前全国报告的甲流死亡病例数，卫生部新闻发言人M**表示:“不信就不信吧，我们每天都在公布甲流疫情的数字，其他的事情我不知道。”毛群安说，“说实话，他所说的我也不相信，所以我也不能就此事发表看法。”（卫生部官员回应Z**质疑：他说的我也不信2009.11.20 ）卫生部近日派出了九个工作组，对河北、山西、内蒙古、辽宁、吉林、黑龙江、浙江、湖南、甘肃、青海、宁夏、新疆等12个省（区）的甲流防控工作特别是重症病例的医疗救治工作进行现场检查督导。对于未依法履行甲流疫情报告和发布职责或者故意隐瞒、谎报、缓报疫情信息的，将按照《传染病防治法》的有关规定，追究相关人员的责任。　　

从上面这段新闻可以看出，Z**的质疑把官方吓的够历害的，中国可能确实存在过隐瞒甲流病例数，但他用这种口气说话，算是击中了中国官僚体系最薄弱环节(这一招非常**，非常有***！！！)　　

Z**：判定甲流疫情趋弱为时尚早(2009.12.20)　　

“哪一种中药预防甲流真正有效？我还没看到证据！”针对当前社会上流传各种中药处方预防甲流的现象，昨天（１２月２４日）出席“无烟亚运健康生活研讨会”的中国工程院院士Z**表示，中药预防甲流的效果还没有得到科学的验证。（Z**：中药防甲流效果还没得到验证2009.12.25）　　

“看到北京两个治疗H1N1中药的研究(数据)，我很服气。”昨天，在北京呼吸疾病研究所成立10周年的学科发展报告会上，Z**院士首次表示，认可中药治疗甲流的功效。（Z**首次表示认可中药治疗甲流功效 2009.12.27）　　

我们可以总结一下中国工程院院士Z**的观点。　　

1：甲流对青壮年的威胁更大　　

2：禽流感暂时没有很大规模的人际传播，但禽流感病毒的毒性很强，具备高度的致死亡率（60%以上），而甲型H1N1虽然致死亡率很低，但是传染性很高。禽流感和甲流这两种病毒有可能发生基因突变，从而演变成一种既具高度传染性、又兼备高致死率的一种病毒，对中国而言将是一种灾难。　　

3： 中药对甲流的防治作用，基本上予以否认，理由是要作临床对比观察，后在事实面前，勉强认可。（中药有其自身问题，但这种态度是否过于武断？）　　

4： 对甲流疫苗安全性问题，他首先表示要谨慎，观察；后又说还要观察；后表示放心，有必要在学校优先开展甲流疫苗接种；再后来，他说甲型H1N1流感病毒变异的可能性增大,中小学生应该尽快接种甲流疫苗。（他的种种说辞，是不是****？）　　

5：11月9日：“甲型H1N1流感病毒变异的可能性增大,中小学生应该尽快接种甲流疫苗”。　　

6：11月18日：“现在全国报告的甲流死亡病例数，我根本不信！”　　

总之，不管他的主观意愿是什么，他的言辞客观上引发了一种恐怖气氛，并使许多人放弃了中药，选择了疫苗。　　

我们有一些问题想请问一下Z**院士，如果Z**院士对人民，国家还有几分感情的话，我们相信Z**院士一定乐意解答这些问题。　　

1  出现在墨西哥城的猪流感，对青壮年的威胁更大。2009年四月中旬猪流感爆发，甲流才出来没多久,并且在墨西哥城。猪流感，对青壮年的威胁更大。这是您自己猜测，还是作了临床对比观察？对中药的防甲流效果，您一直要求做对比观察。那么，猪流感对哪个年龄段的人更具危险性，也要作临床对比观察，才符合您的逻辑，否则和街头算卦的有什么区别？　　

2  禽流感和甲流这两种病毒有可能发生基因突变，从而演变成一种既具高度传染性、又兼备高致死率的一种病毒，对中国而言将是一种灾难。从科学角度考虑，演变可能性存在，但问题是在一年之内完成这种可能性有多大？Gibbs博士的《From where did the 2009 'swine-origin' influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge?》不知看否？我们完全可以设想：牛力气大，跑的慢；马力气小，但跑的快；为发展经济，我们也搞一个基因突变工程，合成一个叫牛马的新物种，它即跑的快又力气大，甚至有可能代替汽车，多好的事！　　

3 “今年，中国甲型H1N1流感的死亡率，应该没有超过历年流感死亡率。” 北京协和医学院公共卫生学院院长黄建始说，“现在还没有任何证据支持，说今年的流感给人们带来了更大的威胁。”(2009.11.30 **网) 请问，您对此有何看法？

4您质疑中国隐瞒甲流死亡数字，有道理。那么，美国疾病控制中心（CDC）的甲流死亡数字，您质疑过吗？为了欺骗中国，很有可能夸大。

5判定甲流疫情趋弱为时尚早(2009.12.20)，请问您的证据是什么？　　

6 世界最理性民族德意志民族, 确定注射的仅11%（ 2009.11. 2**网）。最终，只有５％的德国人接种了疫苗。欧洲各国囤积过多甲流疫苗寻求转手。请问，您对此有何看法？　　

7 截至昨日，深圳甲流疫苗接种人数已经超过20万，疫苗接种人数及接种疫苗占疫苗下拨数的比例均居广东省首位（2009年12月08日11:33  来源：人民网）。香港与深圳一河之隔，人员往来密切。但香港市民对接种疫苗反应冷淡，香港12月21日才开始注射疫苗，到12月24或26日为止，才只有23538人接种，而香港总人口为688万人。香港的天没有塌下来，社会太平依旧。请问，您对此有何看法？

8作为中国工程院院士，HIV/AIDS的潜伏期为7个半月至数年不等，这一点，想必您一定知道。那么Leonard G. Horowitz博士的《Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and the “Man-Made” Origin of HIV/AIDS》及Boyd Graves博士的SPECIAL VIRUS CANCER PROGRAM—RESEARCH LOGIC FLOW及 Dr. Gerald Myers(美国顶尖DNA序列分析家)对HIV/AIDS起源分析的文章，不知您看过否？　　

9中国甲流疫苗制备所采用毒株“NYMCX-179A”来自美国；７月２２日, 由中国疾控中心组织(北京市疾控中心承担),在北京市怀柔区发动１６１４名志愿者开始作临床试验,到10月29日100天（如果是潜伏期为12个月的恶性病毒,100天还处于潜伏期内，根本看不出任何症状）,中国是11月初开始大规模接种。作为中国工程院院士，想必您也一定知道。如果美国发往中国的所谓毒株“NYMCX-179A”实际上是潜伏期为12个月的恶性病毒，这种可能性您考虑过吗？　　

10沃尔夫岗·沃达格，前任德国联邦议院的社会民主党议员（德意志民族是世界上最理性的民族，一定有相当把握，才会说这种狠话！），现任欧洲议会卫生委员会主席，称甲流疫情是世纪骗局 制药公司制造恐慌牟取暴利。

中国的专家学者大致可分为四类：1专业水平高，未被人影响、收买；2专业水平高，被人影响、收买；3专业水平低，未被人影响、收买；4专业水平低，被人影响、收买。郎咸平属于专业水平高，未被人影响`收买之类。我们不能冤枉一个，也不能放过一个！！我们请Z**及每一个关心自身前途命运的同胞一起来认真思考这个生死攸关的大问题！！　　

6.6  还有一个理由　　

还有一个理由就不说了,为了避免XX,让更多人看到此贴.　　

7  德国人及香港人如何应对甲流　　

截至10月28日，近7.3万人参与的德国《图片报》网上调查显示，45%的人说等到疫苗更好的时候再注射，44%的人说拒绝疫苗注射，确定注射的仅11%。（ 2009.11.02）； 拥有８０００多万人口的德国去年经由不同渠道订下５０００万剂甲型流感疫苗。而截至目前，４６００万剂疫苗砸在手里，也就是说，只有５％的德国人接种了疫苗（2010.01.05欧洲各国囤积过多甲流疫苗寻求转手）。德意志民族不愧是世界上最理性的民族！！　　

        与内地不同的是，香港甲流疫苗采购自法国药厂赛诺菲巴斯德(Sanofi Pasteur)。

        香港特区政府署理食物及卫生局长梁卓伟今日表示，截至今午一时，已有逾一千五百人成功接种甲型H1N1流感疫苗，预料圣诞节假期会有更多市民注射该疫苗。 ( 2009.12.21)　　

香港特区政府上周展开高危人士注射甲流疫苗计划，前四天共有23538人接种，只占200万人接种目标的1.2%。香港卫生防护中心总监曾浩辉26日表示，冬季流感高峰期数周内来临，甲流疫苗注射后最少需两星期才生效，呼吁高危人士及早接种疫苗。综合香港媒体报道，香港累积33773宗甲型H1N1流感确诊个案，香港卫生防护中心认为，有关个案仅是冰山一角，推算实际感染宗数多10至20倍，即最多近一成人口、约67万人感染；甲流第二波更可能在数周内“杀到”。 （2009.12.27）　　

香港12月21日才开始注射疫苗，到12月24或26日为止，才只有23538人接种，而香港总人口为688万人。也就是说香港只有0.34%的人接种了疫苗，而香港社会太平依旧。　　

截至昨日，深圳甲流疫苗接种人数已经超过20万，疫苗接种人数及接种疫苗占疫苗下拨数的比例均居广东省首位（2009.12.08）。与香港一河之隔的深圳对一个小小甲流搞的如此紧张，人心惶惶，甲流仿佛洪水猛兽！.　　

香港特首曾荫权带头接种甲流疫苗，向全港市民做出示范。在第二波甲流疫情开始蔓延的情况下，世界各地民众争先恐后接种疫苗，香港市民却反应冷淡，有些人甚至产生“不接种好过接种”的错觉。为人为己都应积极接种疫苗，这也是为提高防疫效果应尽的责任。（2009.12.18）香港市民反应冷淡，是有理智的表现！　　

        截止至12月18日，香港死于甲流的患者只有40多人;截止至12月27日香港累积33773宗甲型H1N1流感确诊个案，就算12月18日至12月27日，又死亡了40多人，香港甲流死亡率最大可能才0.3%,对健康人而言(考虑到许多人没有去报告, 身体有点不舒服,过一二天就好了), 死亡率不会超过0.03%,死亡率太低了！！　　

8  结论　　

2010年1月初，欧洲理事会卫生委员会主席、前任德国联邦议院的社会民主党议员、德国籍流行病学专家沃尔夫冈·沃达格，宣称这场被夸大的甲流疫情其实是“本世纪最大的医学丑闻之一，在我们眼前，其实只有轻微的流感和一场造假的疫情。”称甲流疫情是世纪骗局 制药公司制造恐慌牟取暴利。沃尔夫冈·沃达格对这场骗局已揭穿了一大半，但他认为设计制造这场骗局的目地是制造恐慌牟取暴利。我们分析这种可能性不大，所得不多，而代价太大！　　

综合以上，美国運往中国”NYMCX-179A” 毒株,实际上是类似于HIV这样,有12个月潜伏期的恶性病毒, 这种假定有75%!!美国的目的，就是把新猪源甲型(H1N1)流感病毒在全球传播，制造一场全球大瘟疫，再通过世界卫生组织（WHO）不断制造恐怖气氛，再通过掌握的媒体配合鼓吹，诱骗全世界的人都来打疫苗，做给中国人看。趁机在发往中国的毒株中做手脚，对中国下毒手。结合其它手段，引爆房地产经济政治军事危机，让这些危机总爆发，让中国灭种亡国！！　　

写到这里,真希望这一切都只是一种假设,可种种迹象表明,再用用你的逻辑思维想一想, 这一切不能说100%,但至少有75%可能性!!而中国计划3.9亿人接种疫苗，如果这个计划实现，那么中国将彻底亡国灭种！！写到这里，我们眼中饱含泪水，祖国在危机中！！

9  甲流应对措施　　

 “今年，中国甲型H1N1流感的死亡率，应该没有超过历年流感死亡率。” 北京协和医学院公共卫生学院院长黄建始说，“现在还没有任何证据支持，说今年的流感给人们带来了更大的威胁。”(2009.11.30)来自沈阳的甲流报告：重症甲流患儿全属于瘦弱型 （2009.12.01）

卫生部25日发布疫情通报称：上周(11.16~22)，内地三十一个省份报告甲型H1N1流感确诊病例九千七百三十三例，住院治疗三千一百零一例，死亡五十一人。让我们来计算一下死亡率,约为0.5%(这其中可能包括一些基础病患者,平时就有一些重大疾病);考虑到许多人没有去报告, 身体有点不舒服,过一二天就好了,对健康人而言, 死亡率不会超过0.1%,甚至有可能低至0.01%,也就是说一万人得了甲型H1N1流感,只有1个人会死亡,这种概率太低了。         

立即暂停注射疫苗，国家有关部门立即组织中国未被人影响收买、技术最好的专家学者对此进行调查，只要将中国产疫苗与美国本土产疫苗做一对比实验，作基因测序（中国有无这个技术能力？），真相将大白于天下！　　

决策层对此，千万不要采取隐瞒掩盖的办法，此举将使全体国民看穿美帝国的极端险恶用心，并使台湾、朝鲜韩国日本东南亚伊斯兰国家欧盟国民看穿美帝国的险恶用心，将极大地促进全球反美同盟形成！！另一面，国民要尽量保持冷静克制再冷静克制，因为他们是在极端险恶的内外部环境下作决策……，因为他们……。我们每一个人在指责别人之前，要扪心自问，自己能作的更好？有这样几句名言，值得我们用心用灵魂去体会：“没有义人，一个义人也没有。我们看得见别人眼中的细木，却看不见自己眼中的梁木。我所作的我不知；我所愿的，不去作；我所不愿的，到偏偏去作。”我们提意，共同为中国诚心祷告，诚心悔改自己的罪过，天必予力量智慧，天必佑中华！！　　

Appendix1

Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and the “Man-Made” Origin of HIV/AIDS 　　

by Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. 　　

This article regards a matter of global urgency transcending better known AIDS threats. It describes a universal challenge posed by ever increasing numbers of plagues predicted to depopulate at least half of the world’s current human inhabitants within two generations. This documented science virtually proves, through the process of elimination and a review of the most updated evidence, the origin of HIV/AIDS as an iatrogenic (i.e., man-made) outcome of specific vaccination experiments. 　　

Considered reflection on this AIDS science, along with the sociopolitical correlates and antecedents of this current catastrophe, reveals the likelihood that myriad other immune
dysfunctions, autoimmune diseases, and cancers, including leukemias, lymphomas, sarcomas, and other ailments linked to viral infections, have resulted from previously engineered microbes that have by accident or intent found their way from cancer virus laboratories into humanity’s bloodstream by way of the most trusted public health preventative—vaccinations.　　

If what you are about to read is true, and each point is precisely stated and meticulously documented, beyond extensive depopulation, humanity’s very survival may hinge on this recognition, its implications, and our considered response. Especially relevant, when reflecting on the following facts, is the wisdom addressed by the late World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS czar, Dr. Jonathan Mann, whose life ended tragically on Flight 111 enroute to a European AIDS conference. “More than a medical scientific problem,” Dr. Mann said, “AIDS is a sociopolitical imposition.” 　　

Background　　

AIDS is undoubtedly “man-made.” We can now assert this “very apparent iatrogenic origin,” versus the “theoretic iatrogenic origin” of HIV/AIDS because of the rapidly increasing, now substantial, scientific support for this conclusion. Currently, international scientific consensus among leading investigators in this field, many of whose works and words are excerpted below, holds that HIV/AIDS originated from one or more extraordinary man-made, not natural, events dating back to the early to mid-1970s. Especially implicated in initiating the AIDS pandemic, according to many scientists and scholars, was the hepatitis B vaccine as detailed in the following pages.　　

This may come as a surprise, or even quite a shock, to most people since the mainstream media and most respected medical journals have yet to herald the following knowledge. As a result most “authorities” still issue false and misleading claims such as: 1) “the HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination has been discussed, debated, and dismissed by an overwhelming majority of the HIV/AIDS research community;” 2) “People who claim that AIDS was man-made provide false information and hearsay;” 3) “It is sad that public attention and resources are diverted to attend to such unscientific dribble;” 4) “Man-made origin of AIDS vaccine proponents do severe damage to the public health community and vaccination efforts;” and 5) “Those that advance man-made theories of AIDS have financial motives,” as though there were no financial interests on the other side of the debate. 　　

As a pro bono consultant contacted recently by Amnesty International (AI) members who desired to advance a resolution for the global organization to investigate this HB vaccine thesis, I was appalled by the amount of resistance and politicking performed by members of AI’s so-called “HIV/AIDS Task Force” which sought $1 billion of relief for human rights violations associated with HIV/AIDS from the U.S. Government. These funds, the Task Force reported, were urgently needed to buy drug–cocktails for persons with HIV/AIDS. Each of the five claims cited above were issued by members of this Task Force completely ignorant of the following science. 　　

With regard to the first offensive claim, as the sole author of “Polio, hepatitis B and AIDS: an integrative theory on a possible vaccine induced pandemic” published by Harcourt Publishers, Ltd. of London in the esteemed international journal of Medical Hypothesis,2 this well-focused thesis has never been “discussed, debated,” nor “dismissed” by any consensus in any official capacity. Although Black Americans have been polled regarding the origin of HIV/AIDS being man-made,3 there has never been a published polling of the scientific community in this regard, and certainly not one regarding the HB hypothesis advanced below.　　

HIV/AIDS Origin Misconceptions Versus Science　　

Opponents of iatrogenic (or “man-made”) theories of AIDS have routinely confused hearsay and sporadic media propaganda with hard science, such as that “discussed, debated” and not “dismissed” recently at the Royal Society of London’s inquiry into the origin of this pandemic. They exclusively focused on the theory that contaminated polio vaccines triggered the HIV/AIDS pandemic.4 These proceedings were published in 2001. Quotes relevant to reasoned consideration of this unique/yet-to-be-tested hepatitis B vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS follow. These statements were made by featured presenters, all recognized leaders in this multidisciplinary field discussing the polio vaccine theory of AIDS origination. The first of these quotes is especially relevant to
proposed investigations:　　

“There should be an investigation by an international committee mostly composed of non-medical people concerning how a rather obvious and plausible theory [of AIDS’s origin from contaminated vaccines] came to be scorned and restricted from publication for so long, especially when important consequences regarding mankind’s worst epidemic, and even more important consequences for other possibly even worse that may be following, hang in the balance. As a corollary it should be studied why the hypothesis had to be promoted mainly by outsiders to science and medicine. The ressures towards investigation (and non-investigation) that emanate from huge drug companies and their influence in slanting research in subtle ways should also be examined, as should the role of journals and peer review in potentially obstructing publications of controversial kinds.” W.D. Hamilton,5 quoted by Julian Cribb in “The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: can science afford to ignore it?” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:935-938.　　

“Faced with the terrible burden of AIDS, stories that HIV was introduced into Africa from the West by an accident such as OPV [oral polio vaccine] or intentionally by the USA Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have gained widespread credence. . . . Nevertheless, because natural transmission repeatedly occurs, albeit on rare occasions, does not mean that contamination of a vaccine could not have been the route on another occasion. As with other infections, e.g., hepatitis B virus,natural and iatrogenic transmissions of retroviruses are not mutually exclusive.” Weiss, RA6　　

Despite studies that have advanced evidence suggesting an earlier than 1970 origin of HIV/AIDS,7-9 “[t]he fact that there were ten or so synchronous but distinguishable African epidemics is a definitive feature of AIDS for which the natural transfer theory [e.g., the “cut hunter transfer”] gives no convincing account. . . . To summarize these findings regarding the relatively large number of distinct group M subtypes: no set of likely natural conditions . . . will adequately simulate so many as ten distinguishable subtypes in a complex star-like configuration . . . . [T]he onus is upon the supporters of the natural [not iatrogenic] theory to account for the unexpectedly large number of HIV-1 subtypes. Exponential growth of the epidemic(s) is not by itself a satisfactory explanation (Hahn et al. 2000). . . . The likeliest source of the multiple subtypes and the synchronization of their conspicuous diversification is a punctuated origin [i.e., an iatrogenic event]. . . . [I]t is not far-fetched to imagine the ten or so clades deriving from a single animal (perhaps immunosuppressed and possessing a swarm of variants) [as might have been the case with chimpanzees used in the process of vaccine manufacture] or from a few animals that might have belonged to a single troop or might have been gang-caged together. The number of animals required is secondary to the extent of variation in the source at the time of the zoonotic [i.e., transfer of the virus between species] or iatrogenic event. The [vaccine] hypothesis makes a case for such a punctuated origin . . .” Myers G, et al. 10 　　

“We conclude that SIV cannot become a zoonosis, but requires adaptive mutations to become HIV. Some modern event must have aided in the transition of SIV to HIV. Our research indicates that serial passage of partially adapted SIV between humans could produce the series of cumulative mutations sufficient for the emergence of epidemic HIV strains . . . We conclude that increased unsterile injecting in Africa during the period 1950-1970 provided the agent for SIV human infections to emerge as epidemic HIV in the modern era.” Drucker E, et al.11 　　

I might interject at this point that this conclusion by Drucker et al, although seriously undermining natural evolution theorists, reflects a myopic arrogance unbecoming to their otherwise reasonable hypothesis. Their conclusion neglects the risks inherent in the hepatitis B vaccine manufacturing and testing process as detailed below consistent with the analyses of Myers et al.10 Obviously, all of the above authoritative statements contradict “common knowledge.” The consensus of scientists at this historic British AIDS origin conference favored additional investigations into possible iatrogenic sources of the HIVs.　　

The 1959 HIV Sequence Discovery　　

In the interest of facilitating progress on this issue, much publicity has been given to the notion that HIV was discovered in a 1959 blood sample from Leopoldville, Zaire;9 and that scientific consensus holds 1931 as the approximate date of HIV origination.7 These superstitions have led to common, yet false, declarations that HIV/AIDS originated well before the polio vaccination era and the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) that much evidence below links to the “punctuated origin” of AIDS. 　　

For the record, according to the authors of the 1959 discovery, they never found, nor alleged to have found, HIV, or anything like a full virus. According to these authors, even “attempts to amplify HIV-1 fragments of >300 base pairs (bp) were unsuccessful, . . . However, after numerous attempts, four shorter sequences were obtained” that only represented small portions of two of the six genes of the complete AIDS virus.9 　　

This is why Gao et al, referred to the 1959 sequences as “the oldest trace of the AIDS pandemic . . . although the precise timing and circumstance of early events in the SIVcpz/HIV-1 zoonosis remain obscure.”22 [Editor’s note for the lay reader, “SIVcpz” is short for “simian immunodeficiency virus from the chimpanzee.” This is know to be the closest viral relative to the human AIDS virus, HIV-1.]　　

Unfortunately, regarding the 1959 sequences, Zhu et al., left much room for misinterpretation if not wild speculation by stating that given the “‘starburst phylogeny,’ HIV-1 was probably introduced into humans shortly before that time frame, about a decade or two earlier than previously estimated. . . .” 10 (Emphasis added.) They speculated the zoonosis might have occurred “considerably earlier than the late 1940s.” Obviously, this account is irrelevant to “the extraordinary synchrony in the 1970s of ten or more distinguishable epidemics” discovered by Myers et al. 10 Therefore, this later group of researchers concluded that, with the exception of the 1959 sequences suggesting viral ancestry, “Clinical, serological and molecular retrospective studies have all failed to produce any evidence of AIDS or HIV prior to the 1970s.” 10 (Emphasis added.) As Myers et al., had initially advanced, the early to mid-1970s “Big Bang” origin of HIV/AIDS is further supported by most recent scientific evidence.10　　

As if repeating false assumptions would alter historic and scientific facts, many contemporary investigators, like those representing AI’s HIV/AIDS Task Force, continue to imply the SIV to HIV zoonosis occurred on or before 1959. Many natural evolution theory evangelists continue to cite the now disproven “cut hunter” theory to explain the origin of the pandemic.8,22 Reflecting on Zhu et al’s position, however, they simply concluded that the major-group viruses that dominate the global AIDS pandemic at present shared a common ancestor in the 1940s or the early 1950s. However, given confounding factors, including the likelihood of viral gene recombination during the manufacture and testing of the HB vaccine, like Korber et al.’s speculation discussed in the next section, the 1959 “isolate” may hold little, if any, relevance in determining the origin of HIV/AIDS. 10　　

Suffice it to say, no one has ever found a virus predating the SVCP and the late 1970s.11 At best they found fragments of what may have been the complete virus, but more likely pieces of a progenitor virus they called “a common ancestor” that dated back to “the 1940s or the early 1950s.” These and other portions of this “common ancestor” may have existed for centuries if not millennia. Again, this evidence is rrelevant when considering the 1970s “punctuated [iatrogenic] event” recently determined to be undisputable scientific fact.　　

More importantly, as Zhu and Ho et al., concluded, “the role of large-scale vaccination campaigns, perhaps with multiple uses of non-sterilized needles, should be carefully examined, . . .” as contributing to the sudden emergence of HIV/AIDS in North America and Africa simultaneously during the late 1970s.9,11　　

The 1931 AIDS Origin Assumption and Viral Recombination　　

Regarding the 1931 estimated date of HIV’s origin advanced by Korber et al.7 (i.e., “somewhere between 1910 and 1950”), a critical examination of these authors’ methods reveals problems. Largely speculative due to their use of a confounding-factor-liable computer model, Korber and colleagues noted their limitations. They stated their finding(s) regarding the 1931 genetic projection, that precludes various vaccine-induced pandemic theories, might be wrong if viral recombination(s) had occurred. They most certainly did in the evolutionary process of SIV to HIV according to most cientists.10,13 Yet, despite these facts, iatrogenic theory opponents who have secured a gross burden of proof” advantage in the AIDS origin debate,20 repeatedly reference this group’s work, along with the frequently misrepresented work of Zhu, et al.9 concerning the 1959 sequence discovery.22 　　

Again, the “punctuated origin” of HIV/AIDS determined by Myers et al., can only explain the nearly simultaneous emergence of ten separate, though related, AIDS epidemics in Africa during the early 1970s, that were well established by 1976.10　　

Lending further credence to the theory that early hepatitis B vaccine trials provided the “punctuated event,” Korber et al wrote of anticipated errors in their 1931 determination using linear or recombinant evolutionary models due to “unnatural” or iatrogenic events inciting viral recombination. They wrote , “If there was a concentration of such recombinants during just one period of sampling, the effect on the timing estimate would be unpredictable.” 7 　　

Thus, if the “punctuated origin event” advanced by Myers et al,10 had been the passage of HB virus from polio vaccinated humans to chimpanzees then back to humans, with the additional risk of recombination from pooling hundreds of infected serum samples prior to additional viral recombinant transfers via the HB vaccines given to human subjects in New York City and sub-Saharan Africa, then this might best explain the origin of HIV/AIDS and render Korber et al’s 1931 projection inconsequential. As detailed in the next section, this is precisely the thesis advanced by Horowitz.2,13 　　

In summary, the determinations reached by Korber et al.,7 and Ho et al.,9 of possible dates for the origin of HIV-1, 1931 and 1959 respectively, have been adequately clarified elsewhere.10 “The authors themselves acknowledge, the super-computer-based study cannot tell whether this hypothetical 1930 virus was in humans or animals and so do not show when zoonosis occurred.” 7,10　　

Myers et al. further qualified: “If PIV [primate immunodeficiency virus] was in humans in the first half of the 20th century, it may be estimated, given the assumptions of the look-back analysis, that the ancestral HIV-1 group M virus arose at 1930 plus or minus 20 years.” Conversely, if PIV was not in humans in the first half of the 20th century, then the Korber et al analysis holds little, if any, value in-so-far-as determining a date or origin of the HIVs and AIDS. 7,10　　

The Earliest Hepatitis B Vaccines and The Origin of AIDS　　

If early polio vaccines had not triggered the origin of HIV/AIDS as scientific consensus now holds,6 then some other, chimpanzee-related, “iatrogenic event” must be available to explain the staggering array of deadly recombinants that were proven by Myers et al to have arisen virtually simultaneously during the early to mid-1970s.10,21 In this regard, even more neglected, and perhaps more relevant than the OPV theory of AIDS, is the hepatitis B (HB) vaccine hypothesis.2,13,23　　

According to scientific records,2 African chimpanzees were used in the manufacture of the HB vaccines during the early 1970s. Additional documents prove that human HB viruses cultured in vivo in chimpanzees were returned to humans whose infected blood serum was then pooled to develop four different strains of experimental HB vaccine pilot tested between 1970 and 1975 in New York City and central Africa. This HB vaccine theory of HIV zoonosis proposes that endogenous, or more likely exogenous, progenitor viruses were activated24 when serially transmitted from humans to chimpanzees, then back to humans. Subsequently, pooled blood serum containing HB surface antigen and/or live virions, a milieu ripe for viral recombination, was used to develop the four suspected vaccines administered to New York’s gay population and simultaneously to sub-Saharan Africans. Besides the phylogenetic evidence cited above, epidemiological evidence also supports this HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination. 　　

Figure 1 is derived from Higginson and Muir’s report on cancer studies conducted by the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute (NCI).25 Figure 2 derives from this data superimposed on a map of HIV-1 seroprevalence in Africa reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce in a publication discussing desirable depopulation associated with HIV/AIDS.26 Additional evidence here was supplied in the chronology of the early hepatitis B vaccine trials compiled by Goodfield. 27 The two maps, juxaposed, show a striking correlation between hepatitis B vaccine and liver cancer experiments conducted in Africa during the early 1970s, and the countries in central and southern Africa with the high est HIV-1 seroprevalence rates by 1994. The black squares indicate areas participating in the HB cancer virus research and vaccine trials. 　　

It should also be noted that Mozambique has one of the highest rates of HIV-2, which was allegedly discovered by Essex et al.,28 in Senegalese female prostitutes years after the African hepatitis B vaccination pilot studies began. Due to their state-authorized employment and high risk for infection, Senegalese female prostitutes were required to receive hepatitis B vaccinations for relicensure. That Essex et al. found SIVagm, a documented vaccine contaminant, in the blood of these human subject, is additionally compelling evidence in support of the HB vaccine AIDS origination theory.29　　

2,30 3) Human derived HB viruses, and potentially activated retroviral sequences, were then transferred to chimpanzees, then back again to humans in NYC and central Africa during the development and testing of four genetically altered subtypes of the pre-1975 experimental HB vaccine.32,33 HIV-1 progenitor contamination, recombination, and/or transmission risks were likely increased during this process by: a) human incubation for more than a decade of polio vaccine contaminants and recombinants including SV40, SFR, and possibly SIVagm; b) the pooling of infected blood serum donated by hundreds of gay American and Black African polio vaccine recipients who had subsequently received injections with chimpanzee cultured strains of HB virus; c) the biohazardous laboratory conditions and viral containment problems reported by the HB vaccine investigators and their affiliates; and finally 5) The four pooled serum-derived HB vaccines that were administered to thousands of test subjects by 1975, primarily gay males in NYC and central African Blacks. This series of events provides the best explanation for an early to mid-1970s “punctuated origin event” most precisely fitting the etiological determinations of the HIV-1/AIDS pandemic.10 　　

Again, it should be noted that the African “volunteers” inhabited a geographic area consistent with the highest rates of HIV-1 seroprevalence. Among the nations where rates are highest, HB studies were conducted in: Senegal, Cote d’Ivoire, Uganda, Kenya, Swaziland, and the northeastern part of South Africa. According to circumstantial evidence, eastern Zaire bordering the West Nile region of northwest Uganda also hosted such trials.2,25-27　　

Historic Precedence for the HB Vaccine Hypothesis　　

There is historic precedence for this precise HB thesis. According to Beale, the risk of HB viruses contaminating human blood serum and subsequent vaccinations was determined as early as 1942. Then, more than 62 deaths and 28,500 cases resulted from serum HB contaminated yellow fever vaccines.31 　　

According to Hilleman, early yellow fever vaccines also delivered leukemic retroviruses to human populations due to caged animal and laboratory contaminations and concomitant vaccine transmissions.13 　　

Dr. Hilleman additionally reinforced this “punctuated origin” thesis by describing the risks he encountered by importing contaminated African sub-human primates for vaccine research and development at the Merck pharmaceutical company. Between the late 1950s through the 1970s, Dr. Hilleman told Harvard medical historian Edward Shorter in 1987, “I brought African greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus at the time.”13　　

Given these statements of fact, it is reasonable to suggest, as stated above, the earliest HB vaccine pilot studies may have activated an endogenous or exogenous HIV-related retroviral gene in one or more of the primates,24 fulfilling the “starburst phylogeny” antecedents advanced by Myers et al.10 　　

During the Royal Society’s symposium on the origin of AIDS, Hooper’s 1950s OPV/AIDS hypothesis was largely rebuked because he failed to establish the use of chimpanzees by the Wistar Institute in the production of the suspected OPV.18 Moreover, this vaccine was not given selectively to New York’s gay male population. Curiously, Merck’s early 1970s hepatitis B vaccine trials that did involve gay men in NYC, and Blacks in central Africa, partially prepared in Litton Bionetics (LB) exported/Merck imported African chimpanzees, ironically went without mention.　　

“Burden of Proof” and the Origin of AIDS 　　

The most vocal opponent of the OPV and HB vaccine theories of HIV/AIDS origination is Dr. John Moore, affiliated with Rockefeller University’s Aaron Diamond Research Center in New York.　　

As reported in Medical Hypothesis, following a presentation advancing the HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS at the XI International Conference on AIDS, in 1996, Dr. Moore flippantly rebuked this thesis in the Canadian press. A few years later, he did the same regarding the Edward Hooper’s book, The River, which he alleged was historically inaccurate, potentially damaging to the public’s trust in western medicine, and harmful to his colleagues “efforts to make AIDS vaccines for use in Africa.”2　　

When this author personally contacted Dr . Moore in an effort to begin scientific discourse following his Canadian press interview, Moore refused any formal discussion. Responding later to prodding, he wrote me from the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center saying, “I explicity denied you an interview when you requested one. . . . I said to you that I had ‘no interest’ in your . . . grotesque theories . . . For the record, I know what your views are, and I reject them. Indeed, I dismiss them as uninteresting, incorrect and downright stupid.” In the Vancouver Sun, Moore was further quoted as saying, “HIV is transmitted from monkeys to humans. I don’t think there’s any doubt about that. It’s hard scientific reality.” In fact, according to scientific consensus, the defining zoonosis for the origin of HIV occurred between chimpanzees and humans, not monkeys.2　　

It should be noted that Dr. Moore’s institutional benefactors include the Rockefeller family which, along with the Rockefeller Foundation and its institutional affiliate—the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center in New York—has heavily invested in 　　

viral cancer research, vaccine developments, propaganda programs, population control efforts, and the Merck pharmaceutical company in particular. Thus, Moore’s bias is strongly suggested.2,13,14　　

Worse yet, history shows that soon after Dr. Gallo’s alleged “discovery” of the AIDS virus in 1984, Dr. Moore co-directed the only official effort to examine Merck’s HB vaccine for “fear of possible AIDS transmission.”23 His principle co-investigator was Dr. B.J. Poiesz at the State University of New York. Dr. Poiesz, their paper noted, had worked closely with Dr. Gallo in isolating the “type-C” cancer virus associated with lymphomas during the mid to late-1970s. Their group of researchers included “anonymous CDC authors” who, for unspecified reasons, omitted the centrally important New York City and African HB vaccine recipients from their analysis. Adding insult to this injury, the team’s conclusions were entirely inconsistent with earlier epidemiological
determinations and serological measures.13　　

Reinforcing the observance of such political bias and tainted science in this field of inquiry is the conclusion reached by several featured speakers at the Royal Society’s meeting in London. They addressed the “burden of proof” required of iatrogenic versus natural AIDS origin theorists. 10, 19, 20 These experts protested the unfair unscientific advantage that has been historically given to outspoken natural evolution theorists, such as Dr. Moore, who have been curiously exempt from having to substantiate their obviously flawed claims and hypotheses. Ironically, despite this, their unproven misguided theories remain widely accepted as supposed fact.10, 19,20 　　

The only remedy such deception is updated knowledge regarding the advanced genetic analyses that have seriously undermined arguments for isolated viral leaps that cannot adequately explain the source of AIDS and the “sunburst phylogeny” of HIV’s earliest African strains.10 In the wake of the Royal Society’s symposium, theories that now appear tenuous, if not ludicrous, include isolated parenteral (i.e., skin piercing) injuries (e.g., the “cut hunter theory”), nutritional exposures, population movements, and climatic variations that are alleged to have led to isolated zoonotic events followed years later, evolutionarily, by the spreading plague. Alternatively, many participants at the conference concluded that the transfer of SIV to human beings was probably connected with unprecedented medical activity in Africa in the 20th century.”21 　　

Bionetics Evidence to be Reconciled　　

What continues inadequately reported in the scientific literature, perhaps because researchers remain unaware, or because most investigators would certainly feel threatened by such disconcerting revelations, was that the precise scenario advanced by Myers et al.,10 to best account for the sunburst phylogeny and “punctuated origin” event was repeatedly engineered and studied during the Litton Bionetics (LB) administered SVCP, at precisely the time (1969-1974) required to produce the “Big Bang,” as Myers originally called it. At this same time, LB’s study of HB viral co-infections with viruses currently linked to HIV-related immune suppression and AIDS symptomatology was ongoing, as you will read below. This information comes directly from their contract titled, “Investigations of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates” (NIH Grant Number 71-2025 beginning February 12, 1962). This team, officiated by NCI “Project Officer” Dr. Robert Gallo, the subsequent discoverer of HTLV-1,2 (leukemia viruses) and HIV-1 (the AIDS virus) almost 15 years later, stated: 　　

“During the past year [1970] macaques were inoculated at birth or in utero with the Mason-Pfizer monkey mammary virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Herpesvirus saimiri, and Marek’s disease virus. EB virus was given with immunostimulation and immunosuppression (ALS, prednisone, imuran). Australian antigen [HB virus] was given to newborn African green monkeys.”　　

Might this quoted knowledge have impacted Dr. Gallo’s earliest declaration that the origin of HIV-1 came from “African greens” (i.e., SIVagm), and/or Dr. Hilleman’s confession that he brought the AIDS virus into North America in African greens? 　　

Furthermore, it is well known that HIV-2 sources from macaque monkeys from this same time period.8 Might this specific multiply-infected simian colony be the source of the original SIV to HIV zoonosis? There is much evidence to suggest this, and it is certainly worthy of an official inquiry.　　

It is also curious that EBV was of major interest to the LB team of researchers.　　

It is also well known that EBV is a potent co-carcinogen with HIV-1 and deadly co-factor in the development of AIDS.　　

This 1971 report by Landon, Ting and Gallo et al., referenced the use of “colony-born” primates observed for seroconversion to “EB positive” immune suppressive status predisposing the animals for retroviral infections and cancers. To summarize this work, conducted almost a decade before Dr. Gallo “discovered” the first leukemia retrovirus (HTLV-I), and later HIV-1, his Bionetics coworkers disclosed that their:　　

“[B]reeding and holding colonies were surveyed for antibody to EBV. All breeders were positive and their offspring contain maternal antibody for several months. . . . [Moreover,] An RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, [the primary AIDS-linked enzyme] similar to that associated with RNA tumor viruses, was detected in human leukemic cells but not in normal cells stimulated by phytohemagglutinin. The enzyme was isolated, purified and concentrated 200-fold, making possible its further characterization and study in relation to the leukemic process in man.”33　　

This document, and statement alone, considering its date, should be adequate impetus for an independent investigation into the SVCP with regard to the origin of AIDS.　　

Reflecting on the specific scenario advanced by Myers and co-workers regarding the phylogenetic, recombinant, and immunosuppressive correlates and antecedents of the “starburst” that reflects at least ten simultaneous HIV/AIDS African outbreaks, the Bionetics investigators stated the significance and “proposed course” of their vaccine research involving chimpanzees. They wrote:　　

“Significance to Biomedical Research and to the [Special Virus Cancer] Program of the [National Cancer] Institute: Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human [cancer] viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations and, subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates [i.e., chimpanzees] to man justifies utilization of these animals for these purposes. Further study of altered transfer RNA and polymerase enzymes would determine their significance in neoplastic change and provide a basis for selection of therapeutic agents.　　

“Proposed Course: Continuation with increased emphasis on monitoring and intensive care of inoculated animals to determine if active infection occurs, effects of infection, and degree of immunosuppression when used. Further studies of human neoplasms at a molecular level will continue.”33　　

Inasmuch as humans were not being directly infected with “candidate viruses” during this program according to the contract summary, live viral vaccines derived from retroviruses similar to the HIVs were being prepared and tested in primate populations that apparently included humans as well as chimpanzees. This at the precise time that the Australian antigen—the HB highly infectious and easily transmissible cancer virus—and related HB vaccines were being injected into both chimpanzees and humans in New York and Sub-Saharan Africa by LB collaborators.33 　　

At the XI International Conference on AIDS in 1996, when questioned regarding his involvement in these Bionetics studies, Dr. Gallo angrily replied to this author, “Quite frankly, I don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.”13 If the HB vaccine theory might be the focus of a reputable independent inquiry, such as the one urged by Cribb,19 and now AI members, Dr. Gallo might be obliged to formally discuss his contract with Bionetics wherein the “Australian antigen was given to newborn African green monkeys” in the context of testing “a swarm of [candidate viral and retroviral] variants.” If he still contends this HB vaccine/origin of AIDS theory has no merit, as he argued forcefully at that time, then perhaps he would be willing to publish an alternative account reflecting more recent scientific revelations.　　

35　　

The following SVCP contract excerpt34 discusses the testing of effective treatments for HIV/AIDS-like infections at that early date: 　　

Might this be a cure for HIV/AIDS? Unless further investigations into this matter are conducted, we may never know.　　

Reflecting on these revelations in-so-far-as the myriad viral recombinants potentially contaminating LB’s labs and caged animals, and the determinations of Myers et al,10 a most appropriate question is, “Why only ten forms of HIV/AIDS broke out during the early1970s?” It would seem likely that many of the SIVs originated from these investigations as well as other pandemics such as herpes that exploded during the mid to late 1970s along with immune suppressive disorders associated with EBV infections and related cancers. Obviously, it would be helpful to investigate the possibility of other plagues that may have derived from vaccine contaminations and transmissions during the SVCP.　　

Many researchers, in fact, issued forewarnings about the grave risks posed by recombinant cancer virology.13 Others cited similar risks from public health’s “sacred cow” vaccinations.31 It is sobering to reflect on this knowledge in the wake of the Royal Society’s publications and official evaluations.19　　

Considering The Genocidal Theory of AIDS　　

The 1998 report of Zhu et al.9 was well timed to help promote co-author Edward Hooper’s book, The River, which substantially reinforced a previously advanced OPV theory of AIDS’s origin,12 and gave only superficial consideration to possible hepatitis B vaccine contaminations as the zoonotic vector for transferring/transforming SIVcpz into the human AIDS virus by 1976.4 Hooper referenced Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? among the texts that explore the genocidal theory of AIDS which he credited for his background on the hepatitis B theory.13 He cautioned against blanket acceptance of the intentional theory of HIV/AIDS, which is consistent with the proposed AI investigation of the SVCP, but he did not rule out the possibility that HIV was released intentionally.4　　

As Weiss stated, theories involving the CIA in the origin of AIDS have gained wide acceptance.6 Investigations by Horowitz et al.2,3,13 focused on the CIA and the 1969 appropriations hearings in which the NAS–NRC was credited as the source of technical expertise for the U.S. Army’s development of AIDS-like viruses. At that time, biological weapons were of great interest to Nelson Rockefeller’s protégé, and Nixon administration National Seurity Advisor (NSA), Dr. Henry Kissinger. According to his biographer, and two previous CIA directors—William Colby and Richard Helms—Kissinger oversaw the CIA’s top secret biological weapons program called MK:NAOMI. Soon after becoming NSA, he ordered a review of such weapons capabilities.13-15 　　

Furthermore, in the early 1970s, in keeping with U.S. Government and global industrialists’ initiatives reflecting Rockefeller-directed Population Council urgings for Third World depopulation, Kissinger requested and received National Special Security Memorandum 200 articulating the urgency of dramatically reducing African populations.16 At that time Kissinger and associates were leading advisors to the Merck pharmaceutical company whose president, George W. Merck, was America’s biological weapons industry director, as he had been since World War II.17 　　

According to Hooper, the genocidal hypothesis of HIV/AIDS should be “taken with a grain of salt.”4 It is clear, however, that compelling evidence exits, albeit circumstantial, that U.S. Government officials, including Henry Kissinger, may have had something to do with the initial HIV/AIDS outbreak. At the precise time corresponding to the earliest transmissions of HIV/AIDS, Kissinger directed a national security cryptocracy that included corporate affiliates at the biological weapons contractor /vaccine maker Merck, as well as the traditional weapons contractor Litton Industries. Litton’s president, Roy Ash, also served in the Nixon administration overseeing American industry. Litton’s medical subsidiary, Bionetics, as detailed above, largely directed the NCI’s SVCP, administered America’s premier biological weapons testing center at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and supplied the chimpanzees, monkeys, monkey viruses, primate cell lines, and other resources for cancer research, biological weapons development, and
vaccine manufacture. 　　

Thus, Kissinger certainly maintained the means, through his official channels at Merck, Litton Bionetics, and the CIA, as well as the motive, to deploy AIDS-like viruses by 1974 in Merck’s HB vaccine. What is unconscionable to most people, Kissinger, a staunch advocate of African depopulation, would have considered it convenient that the emergence of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa coincided synchronously with the massive depopulation policy institutionalized with primary funding from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Merck Fund.2,3,13,14 　　

Most recently, Kissinger’s direction of foreign genocidal operations has been heralded by even mainstream periodicals.36 In light of these revelations, it is stunning that Kissinger wrote his own genocide indemnification policy on behalf of the United States Government in Foreign Affairs published by the Council on Foreign Relations in 2001.37　　

The Challenge Before Us　　

“There is a crisis of public faith in science and scientists,” stated Dr. Julian Cribb, referring to the contentious manner in which origin of HIV/AIDS research and debate has been conducted thus far. “What I have described is . . . a systematic endeavour to suppress public discussion and scientific inquiry into this important [vaccine] hypothesis and to discredit its proponents over more than 12 years.” 　　

He summarized before the esteemed Royal Society gathering. “Unless scientists are prepared to go into this issue objectively and transparently, it will damage the standing of science in the eyes of the community.” 19　　

Determining the origin of HIV/AIDS is vital for the following reasons according to Cribb: 1) to prevent similar calamities in the future; 2) to discover remedial methods and materials that might evolve from such knowledge; 3) to improve safety standards in viral laboratories and vaccine production facilities based on the knowledge of the pandemic’s origin; and 4) to restore faith and trust in this area of science and medicine. 19　　

Furthermore, Cribb argued, “If AIDS is iatrogenic, through an honest mistake, science may be forgiven. But if it seeks to bury the idea, first, it will fail and second, it will destroy public trust.” To the extent that the HB vaccine theory of AIDS is officially neglected, as Hamilton foretold: “This hypothesis is certainly not going to go away.”19　　

But if the HB vaccine theory on the origin of AIDS, as current science overwhelmingly supports and the “process of elimination” has virtually proven, is ultimately accepted, then Cribb’s forgivable “honest mistake” conjecture might need to be reexamined against more unnerving possibilities. 　　

At the time of this writing, the U.S. Homeland Security Act passed the Senate virtually unanimously. Mysteriously incorporated in its text was a vaccine injury indemnity clause that freed drug companies from liabilities associated with specific vaccine ingredients, such as HIV precursors in the HB vaccines. With this gross violation of U.S. constitutional, civil, and human rights, hundreds of thousands of Americans have been forced to care, without compensation, for vaccine injured family members. If the U.S. Government is able to get away with this most blatant breach of public faith, what is it capable of doing covertly? Clearly, this current vaccine policy is a form of institutionalized genocide—defined as “the mass enslaving (pharmaceutically and otherwise) and killing of people for economics, politics, and/or ideology?” 　　

So long as the above scientific facts and AIDS issues remain unaddressed by medicine’s mainstream, the implications are that AIDS science and vaccination policies, and likely all of science, has evolved in a vacuum devoid of ethics to serve political, economic, and/or ideological motives. Thus, by strict definition, genocide and iatrogenesis have much. So much so that regardless of whether HIV/AIDS originated by accident or intentionally, with this data, there is sufficient justification to coin a new most appropriate term—“iatrogenocide.”　　

Further research to test this hypothesis should include: retrospective epidemiological studies of homosexual populations in New York reported to have received the earliest HB vaccines; serological studies of any stored blood and/or serum from these early HB vaccine study subjects; likewise for the chimpanzees used in the preliminary trials and/or vaccine manufacture; and genetic analyses of viral components in samples of the vaccine lots used during these earliest HB vaccine trials (if still available).　　

About the Author　　

Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., is an internationally known authority in the overlapping fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases, and bioterrorism. He received his doctorate in medical dentistry from Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in 1977, was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship in behavioral science at the University of Rochester, earned a Master of Public Health degree from Harvard University, and another Master of Arts degree in health education from Beacon College, all before joining the research faculty at Harvard. Dr. Horowitz is best known for his national bestselling book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? (Tetrahedron Press, 1998; 1-888-508-4787)　　

which recently resulted in the United Stated General Accounting Office investigating the man-made origin of AIDS theory. (See: http://www.healingcelebrations.com/gao.htm) Dr. Horowitz’s brilliant work in the field of vaccination risk awareness has prompted at least three Third World nations to change their vaccination policies. His recent stunning testimony before the United States Congress’ Government Reform Committee, literally brought the hearing to a halt. (See: http://www.healingcelebrations.com/Disease%20Deities%20on%20Capitol%20Hill%20Address%20Autism.htm) Dr. Horowitz questioned government health officials regarding a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) secreted report showing a definitive link between the mercury ingredient (i.e., thimerosal), common to most vaccinations, and the skyrocketing rates of autism and behavioral disorders affecting our children and the future our nation.　　

Incredibly, Dr. Horowitz alerted the FBI, in writing and in person, one week before the first anthrax mailing was announced in the press, that a “major anthrax fright” was in the process of unfolding that demanded the FBI’s urgent attention. Needless to say they did not heed Dr. Horowitz’s prophetic warning. 　　

Moreover, three months before the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Dr. Horowitz released his thirteenth book, prophetically titled Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare. The book focuses on the West Nile Virus as an act of bioterroism, and considers what and who is really behind this and other recent outbreaks. Dr. Horowitz argues that his disclosures expose the roots of global terrorism, along with the individuals and organizations at the heart of what he calls “the petrochemical–pharmaceutical cartel.” He believes this “multi-national corporate beast” is in the process of committing global genocide, profiting from engineered frights, and at the same time, most efficiently culling targeted populations considered excessive.　　

Very recently, you may have heard that Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called for an investigation into the links between the recent West Nile Virus outbreaks and bioterrrorism. Dr. Horowitz is the principle pioneer and investigator of this theory. 　　

Dr. Horowitz’s contact information, books, audiotapes, and video programs are available through http://www.originofaids.com/articles/www.tetrahedron.org, or by calling 1-888-508-4787.　　

References　　

(1) Heinrich J. Origin of AIDS Virus. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, GAO-02-809R; available from http://%20www.gao.gov/main.html. See also:Tetrahedron Publishing Group press release, “U.S. GAO Commits Scientific Fraud In AIDS Inquiry: Congressional Investigators Conceal and Lie Says Expert,” available from healingcelebrations.com. 　　

(2) Horowitz LG. Polio, hepatitis B and AIDS: an integrative theory on a possible vaccine induced pandemic. Med Hypoth 2001;56(5):677-686. 　　

(3) Horowitz LG, Strecker R, Cantwell SR, Vid, D, and Grossman G. The Mysterious Origin of HIV: Reviewing the Natural, Iatrogenic and Genocidal Theories of AIDS. XI International Conference on AIDS, July 10, 1996, Vancouver, BC. Canada. See full text of abstract and presented paper Here 　　

(4) Hooper E. The River. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1999. 　　

(5) Hamilton, WD., quoted by Julian Cribb in “The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: can science afford to ignore it?” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001;356:935-938. 　　

(6) Weiss, RA, Natural and iatrogenic factors in human immunodeficiency virus transmission. Phil. Trans. R. Roc. Lond. B 2001;356,947-953. 　　

(7) Yusim K, Peeters M. Pybus OG and Korber B, et al. Using human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sequences to infer historical features of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome epidemic and human immunodeficiency virus evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Roc. Lond. B 2001;356,855-866. 　　

(8) Sharp PM, Bailes E, Chaudhuri RR and Hahn BH, et al. The origins of acquired immune deficiency syndrome viruses: where and when? Phil. Trans. R. Roc. Lond. B 2001;356,867-876. 　　

(9) Zhu T, Korber BT, Nahmias AJ, Hooper E, Sharp PM and Ho DD. An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin of the epidemic. Nature 1998;391(Feb. 5):594-597. 　　

(10) Burr T, Hyman JM and Myers G. The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: Darwinian or Lamarchkian? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:877-887; For early research regarding the “Big Bang” theory of HIV, see also: Myers G, Macinnnes K and Myers L. “Phogenetic moments in the AIDS epidemic.” Chapter 12 in S.S. Morse, ed., Emerging Viruses (Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1993). 　　

(11) Marx PA, Alcabes PG and Drucker E.11 “Serial human passage of simian immunodeficiency virus by unsterile injections and the emergence of epidemic human immunodeficiency virus in Africa” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:911-920. 　　

(12) Elswood B and Stricker R. Polio vaccine and the origin of AIDS. Med Hypoth 1994;42,347-354. 　　

(13) Horowitz LG and Martin WJ. Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1998. Note: the Hilleman revelations concerning leukemia virus tainted yellow fever vaccines discussed on page 485 derive from a sequestered recorded interview conducted in 1986 by Edward
Shorter for a Merck funded documentary, “The Health Century.” 　　

(14) Horowitz LG. Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare. Sandpoint, ID. Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2001. 　　

(15) Isaacson W. Kissinger. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992, p. 205. 　　

(16) National Security Agency. National Special Security Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. The White House: December 10, 1974 (Declassified July 3, 1989.). 　　

(17) Covert NM. Cutting Edge: A history of Fort Detrick, Maryland 1943-1993. Fort Detrick , Maryland: U.S. Army Garrison, Public Affairs Office, 1993, pp. 17, 20, 39. 　　

(18) Plotkin SA. Untruths and consequences: the false hypothesis linking CHAT type 1 polio vaccination to the origin of human immunodeficiency virus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol. Sci. 2001 Jun 29:356(1410):815-823. 　　

(19) Cribb J. The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: can science afford to ignore it? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001;356:935-938. 　　

(20) Martin B. The burden of proof and the origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001;356:939-938. 　　

(21) Bliss M. Origin of AIDS (letter). The Lancet 2001;357 (January 6):73-74. 　　

(22) Gao F, Bailes E, Shaw GM, Sharp PM and Hahn BH et al. Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes. Nature 1999 (Feb. 4);397:436-440. See also: Horowitz LG. Response to Zhu et al. 1959 Origin of AIDS. Unpublished letter to the editor of Nature. Available for review Here ; See also: Horowitz L. Analysis of Gao F and Bailes E study. Unpublished report available for review Here 　　

(23) Poiesz B, Tomar R, Lehr B and Moore J. (along with anonymous CDC authors). Hepatitis B vaccine: Evidence confirming lack of AIDS transmission. MMWR 1984;33;49:685-687. 　　

(24) Marriott SJ, Lee TH, Slagle B and Butel JS. Activation of the HTLV-1 long terminal repeat by the hepatitis B virus X protein. Virology 1996, 224;1:206-213. 　　

(25) Higginson J and Muir CS. Epidemiologic program of the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) In: The National Cancer Program and International Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute Monograph 1974 (40:65). 　　

(26) Jamison E and Hobbs F. World Population Profile: 1994, With a Special Chapter Focusing on HIV/AIDS (WP/94) by Peter O. Way and Karen A. Stanecki). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1994. 　　

(27) Goodfield J. Quest for the Killers. Basel; Stuttgart: Birkhauser, 1985, p. 94. 　　

(28) Kanki PJ, Barin S, Essex M. et al. New human T-lymphotropic retrovirus (HTLV-IV) related to simian T-lymphotropicvirus Type III (STLV-IIIagm). Science 1986;232:238-43. 　　

(29) Schultz TF. Origin of AIDS (letter). The Lancet 1992;339:867. 　　

(30) Krugman S. Viral hepatitis type B: Prospects for active immunization. In: International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis, Milan, Dec. 1974. Develop. biol. Standard. Vol. 30, Munich: S. Karger Basel, 1975, pp. VI; 363-367; relevant general discussion can be found on pp.375-379; See also: Krugman S, Giles JP, Hammond J. Hepatitis virus: effect of health on the infectivity and antigenicity of the MS-1 and MS-2 strains. J Infectious Disease. 1970;122:432-6; Krugman S, Giles JP, Hammond J. Viral hepatitis, type B (MS-2 strain): Studies on active immunization. JAMA 1971;217:41-5; Krugman S, Giles JP. Viral hepatitis, type B (MS-2 strain); further observations on natural history and prevention. New England Journal of Medicine 1973;288:755-60; and Krugman S, Overby LR, Mushahwar IK, Ling C-M, Forsner GG and Deinhardt F. Viral hepatitis, type B: Studies on natural history and prevention reexamined. New England Journal of Medicine 1979;200:101-6. 　　

(31) Beale J. Origin of AIDS (letter). The Lancet 2001;357 (January 6):73. 　　

(32) Purcell RH. Current understanding of hepatitis B virus infection and its implications for immunoprophylaxis. In: Antiviral Mechanisms: Perspectives in Virology IX. The Gustav Stern Symposium. New York: Academic Press, 1975, pp. 49-76. 　　

(33) NCI staff. The Special Virus Cancer Program: Progress Report #8 [and #9]. Office of the Associate Scientific Director for Viral Oncology (OASDVO). J. B. Moloney, Ed., Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1971 [and 1972]. Note: This is a very hard publication to find. Few library data bases have it listed, including the NCI Library at Fort Detrick. It is available through the Davis Library, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Government Documents Department Depository, Reference # HE 20.3152:V81. The Litton “support services” contracts that included primate supplies are found on pp. 187-88 and 326-327 of the reports. Litton’s list of mutant viruses, including retroviruses, and other experimental infectious agents including AuAg is found on pp. 279-280 and 284 of Project Report #8, of 1971; for additional documentation on hepatitis and herpes experimentation in Uganda before 1971 see: Higginson J and Muir CS. Epidemiologic program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). In: The National Cancer Program and International Cancer Research, National Cancer
Institute Monograph, 1974; 40:65. 　　

(34) Rabin H, Kinard R. Gruber J and Pearson G. Bionetics Research Laboratories, Inc. (NIH 71-2025) Investigations of viral carcinogenesis in primates. Here reference is made to “Drs. McAllister, Gardiner, and Huebner” having “isolated” the cat-human hybrid oncornavirus, RD-114, “from a human sarcoma” as early as 1971. See reprinted contract summary in Horowitz, Op cit. 1998, p. 429. 　　

(35) Shilts R. The Band Played On. New York: Penguin Books, 1987, p. 107. 　　

(36) Hitchens C. The Case Against Henry Kissinger. Harper’s Magazine, February and March, 2001. 　　

(37) Kissinger HA. The pitfalls of universal jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs. July/August 2001. Preview available from through http://www.foreignaffaris.org/.　　

Appendix2　　

AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD G. HOROWITZ　　

Posted by margaret on September 22, 2009 at 7:00pm　　

View margaret's blog　　

Tetrahedron Publishing Group
Health Science Communications for People Around the World
217 Cedar St., Suite # 326 ۰ Sandpoint, ID 83864 ۰ 208-265-8065 http://www.tetrahedron.org

NEWS RELEASE

Release: No. H1N1-15
Date Mailed: September-15-2009
For Immediate Release
Contact: Rob Potter—949-715-2217 or 310-877-3002　　

WARNING: Drug Cartel Exposed Creating, Releasing, Injecting, Infecting, and Depopulating Planet with Pandemic H1N1 Swine Flu Viruses and Vaccines

Los Angeles, CA— World leading drug-industry investigators have uncovered stunning documents proving an international drug ring, operating from New York City, is behind the H1N1 swine flu fright and vaccination preparations.
Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, America’s leading consumer health expert, and Sherri Kane, an investigative journalist, have released shocking proof in legal affidavits that leaders of a private global biotechnology “trust” are behind everything you ever heard about pandemic flu, including its origin and alleged prevention via vaccination. Their documents, being sent through attorneys to the FBI today, evidence powerful industrialists operating a crime ring within “Partnership for New York City” are behind the pandemic’s creation, media persuasions, vaccination preparations, and health official promotions seen everywhere from supermarkets to health clinics.
“David Rockefeller’s trust, that engages several powerful partners on Wall Street, including media moguls Rupert Murdock, Morton Zuckerman, Thomas Glocer, and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Jerry Speyer,” are implicated in advancing global genocide,” Dr. Horowitz wrote to FBI directors, through a team of attorneys assembled to stop the swine flu vaccines from being given.
“This ‘partnership’ controls biotechnology research and development globally. Health commerce internationally is also controlled virtually entirely by this trust that exercises near complete control over mainstream media to promote/propagandize its products and services for the drug cartel's organized crime. This trust, in essence, makes or breaks medical and natural healing markets, primarily through the mass media companies and propaganda it wields for social engineering and market building,” Dr. Horowitz wrote.
Among the most stunning revelations from the Horowitz-Kane research are those linking Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, Inc., and the 9-11 terrorist attacks, to the drug cartel’s geopolitical, economic, and population reduction activities. Mr. Silverstein, leaser of the World Trade Center who authorized to have building 7 “pulled,” meaning detonated, is a chief suspect in the “9-11 truth” investigation. Silverstein is currently landlord and co-partner in the biotechnology trust founded by David Rockefeller and implicated by these new discoveries.
“If these people can get away with killing more than 3,000 people in 8 seconds on 9-11, they are completely capable of murdering millions, even billions, of people worldwide this flu season,” Dr. Horowitz commented. “I pray these revelations will save millions of lives and help activists call upon President Barack Obama to demand legitimate inquiries into these genocidal atrocities.”

Given the unprecedented nature and urgency of these findings, Dr. Horowitz has posted his affidavit for public review on FLUscam.com, praying other activist will spread the information in order to prompt governments worldwide to cease mass vaccination preparations to avoid becoming accessories to the crime of genocide.
-End-
Note to Journalists: For interviews with investigators Horowitz and Kane, please contact Rob Potter at 949-715-2217, or e-mail: [email protected]. SCROLL DOWN TO READ AFFIDAVIT.

AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD G. HOROWITZ　　

http://fluscam.com/Affidavit.html

(More Links On Original in Above Link)

1.This Affidavit is based on my personal knowledge, except where otherwise stated, and, if called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify to the matters herein stated.

2.I am a Harvard University trained certified expert in the fields of behavioral science, health education/health promotion, media persuasion, medical sociology, public health, and emerging diseases. I have additional expertise in natural healing methods and materials, including genetics and electro-genetics, by reason of my academic training, scientific publications, and internationally recognized authority and celebrity in these fields.

3.I openly disclose my bias and conflicting interests as a leading author, personal health care educator, consumer protector, alternative and complementary health care specialist, and formulator of natural remedies for public protection and remediation of diseases. I hold trademarks covering several products that compete directly with the drug industry’s monopolization of medicine as described herein. This competitive vantage enables me to critically assess elements and actions within “BigPharma” that few people perceive. My sponsorships by natural products companies, including those that manufacture and distribute OxySilver and Liquid Dentist, helps pay for my expenses in serving as I have for thirty years without grants or academic/institutional restraints providing the freedom to simply “tell it like it is” based on science and researched evidence. Without sponsors, radio and television networks would cease operations, and so would I. The critical difference between BigPharma, and its products, versus the natural health products industry, and my endorsements, is the former is criminally operating and killing people as evidenced herein, whereas my colleagues and I are persecuted by the powers exposed herein, and continue helping people heal naturally nonetheless.

4.I further disclose that I am a Levite priest by virtue of my bloodline, spiritual direction, and ecclesiastical commitments. I am the body corporate and Overseer of The Royal Bloodline of David, an omni-denominational healing ministry established in the State of Washington and certified by the Secretary of State therein in 2000; and was the pro se counsel in Horowitz vs. The State of Hawaii, Department of Health, et al. (Civ. No. 06-1-0296).

5.Compelled by God and my responsibilities in these positions I have sought on several occasions, by whatever lawful means, to protect the U.S. Constitutional right of every American to exempt from risky vaccinations for religious, philosophical, and medical reasons; and protect Americans’ bodies as absolute personal properties for which compensation must be paid if and when taken, according to the 5th Amendment of the Constitution.

6.I understand that substantial historical evidence exists proving unequivocally the Rockefeller family’s monopolistic influence over American medicine and public health that is material to this affidavit and related complaint. David Rockefeller’s powerful influence over the Council on Foreign Relations, geopolitics, and global economics is solidly established.

7.I have reviewed the records and files cited herein and attest to the following facts that evidence fraud, official malfeasance, organized crime, and the administration of genocide (i.e., iatro-genocide) operating under the guise of “public health” within a trust organization established by David Rockefeller called “Partnership for New York City” involving the US Federal Government, and New York State Government, pertaining to the 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu “outbreak,” “pandemic,” and advancing vaccination campaign.

8.I conclude that this subject is a matter of extreme urgency, threatening national security, thus demanding the immediate scrutiny of lawmakers and justice department officials, as well as the public-at-large.

9.It is a well-established fact that “outbreaks” have been caused by laboratory “accidents.” For instance, the 1977 Influenza A outbreak of human (“swine flu”) H1N1 that went extinct for twenty years between 1957 and 1977 suddenly re-emerged immediately following: a. the suspicious unexplained 1976 military outbreak at Fort Dix, New Jersey of this strain that was most likely a covert military experiment; and b. the subsequent swine flu deadly vaccination program that followed the Fort Dix outbreak, and media-driven fright; that has been attributed to a “laboratory source” according to doctors Zimmer and Burke in the New England Journal of Medicine (July 16, 2009;Vol.361:279-285). (See EXHIBIT 1)

10. The November 1977 sudden reemergence of this Influenza A H1N1 strain in the former Soviet Union is best explained by the National Cancer Institute’s 1978 publication titled Special Virus Cancer Program (Library call number: E20.3152;V81/977 and 78-21195). This report revealed the June 15, 1976 contract (N01-CP-6-1047) with the American Type Culture Collection to supply “virus materials . . . to investigators throughout the world” via a “US-USSR Agreement” (a dangerous breach of Cold War national security). (See: EXHIBITS_2-3.pdf) Virus materials cited in this document included numerous infectious agents including influenza, parainfluenza, and even laboratory recombinations of influenza with acute lymphocytic leukemia viruses that might spread quick acting lymphatic cancers by sneezing.(See: EXHIBIT_4.pdf)

11. The April, 2009 “outbreak” of the H1N1 “swine flu” is, like the 1976 Fort Dix and 1977 general “outbreaks,” highly suspicious according to genetic analysts and leading virologists. The rapid mutation rates of the novel agent circulating and feared as the 2009 “swine flu” strongly suggests a laboratory source, either intentionally or accidentally released.

12.To make it more difficult for the public to comprehend what is ongoing in flu labs, according to EXHIBIT_5.pdf, World Health Organization officials developed new terminology to describe viruses used in vaccinations, gene therapies, and advancing biotechnologies. The new terms “reference materials,” “biosimilars,” “data packages,” and “mock-up files,” each designate viruses and/or viral materials including gene sequences that cause disease and immune system reactions.

13.According to EXHIBIT_6.pdf, World Health Organization officials in charge of developing influenza vaccines, Dr. James Robertson and Dr. John Wood, of the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) in the UK, testified (April, 2006) that “if a pandemic is imminent, . . . A stockpile of live vaccine, . . . could be used to prime the population in advance . . .”

14.According to this document, these doctors are the “Principal Scientists in the Division of Virology at NIBSC. Dr. Wood and Dr. Robertson lead the NIBSC’s influenza group. Their responsibilities include the control and standardization of influenza vaccines. On behalf of the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO) the NIBSC is involved in the serological testing of vaccine trials; the preparation and distribution of influenza viruses to vaccine manufacturers; and the coordination of EU strain selection process.” (ie., the selection of viruses that shall be used by governments worldwide, and their “vaccine pipelines.”

15.Dr. Robertson also testified that “there is a lack of vaccine research in the UK compared with the US,” and that he and Dr. Wood “consider that pandemic vaccine development in the EU has been slow due to limited public funding. This is in contrast to the situation in the USA. Dr. Wood told the group that the NIBSC collaborate with the vaccine industry . . . The EMEA have helped to persuade industry to invest in pandemic vaccines with the introduction of the mock up files and by waiving the regulatory fees . . .” [Emphasis added]

16. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) is a decentralized body of the European Union with headquarters in London. Its main responsibility is, according to its website, “the protection and promotion of public and animal health, through the evaluation and supervision of medicines for human and veterinary use.”

17.Thus, it is certain that when the Mexican Swine Flu 2009 “outbreak” occurred in mid April, 2009, first in the United States in two unrelated children living approximately 100 miles apart in southern California, then soon after in Mexico among people who had not been exposed to these two children, that foul play is a most reasonable explanation, especially since this unique virus held genes from avian, swine, Spanish, and regular flu strains—unprecedented in the history of “natural selection” health science addressing evolution of the species.

18. Occam’s Razor analysis holds that, "Of several acceptable explanations for a mysterious phenomenon, the simplest is preferable, provided that it does not contradict the observed facts."

19.Accountable US Federal officials overseeing America’s “biopreparedness” response against this mutant H1N1 flu, including vaccinations and predicted quarantines, offer no definitive explanation for the initial outbreak of this laboratory sourced recombinant; nor does the mainstream media. So called “experts” accept and regurgitate the lame explanation of “somehow” and “somewhere” bird, pig, and 1918 Spanish flu viruses mated curiously synchronously with the first availability of biotechnology to produce vaccines alleged to be safe and effective against this precise new H1N1 and H5N1 genetic recombinant.

20. Alternatively, the following substantial evidence indicts David Rockefeller et al, including celebrated Federal agents, agencies, and vaccine makers that control the mainstream media and the practice of medicine in an organized criminal conspiracy to profit by generating and promoting this pandemic

a.Days before the media’s first reported swine flu cases in April, 2009, Novavax Corporation, partnered with the General Electric (GE) company that co-owns NewCo with media mogul Rupert Murdoch, issued press releases generating widespread publicity.　　

b.Thus, America’s most powerful news media consortium, and cable television conglomerate, publicized Novavax’s vaccine research in collaboration with CDC officials, alleging their vaccine protected against this unprecedented recombination of flu stains—avian, Spanish flu, and regular flu infections.(See EXHIBIT_7.pdf)

c.According to Dr. Robertson’s testimony presented above, Novavax received its “biosimulars” through CDC Influenza Branch director, Ruben O. Donis, and Dr. Rick Bright. Dr. Bright previously worked with Dr. Donis at the CDC. In April, 2009, Dr. Bright was Novavax’s Vice President of Global Influenza Programs.

d.The publicized outbreak caused Novavax’s stock to soar. Novavax’s CEO, Rahul Singhvi, and his previous corporate affiliate, the Merck Pharmaceutical company that manufactures the flu-related pneumonia vaccine (Pneumovax), both profited heavily from the “outbreak,” media coverage, and declared advancing pandemic.

e.No group in the world other than the Anglo-American vaccine “pipeline,” with its faucets at the NIBSC and CDC, could supply Novavax’s collaborators with the wherewithal to manufacture and release the recombinant virus reported by officials and Reuter’s News Service. (See: EXHIBIT_8.pdf)

f.A Google search proves Thomas H. Glocer is the Chief Executive Officer of the Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRC) and Director of the TRC that partnered in David Rockefeller’s biotechnology trust called “Partnership for New York City,” (PNYC). Thomas H. Glocer is also a Merck [pharmaceutical company] Director since 2007, according the Merck company website. (See: EXHIBIT_9.pdf.)

g.Two additional “partners” are the New York State Government, and the US Federal Government, likewise advancing vaccine research in partnership with private companies in this PNYC. Both governments then purchase vaccines from other partners in the PNYC.

h.The PNYC, according to their website (http://www.pfnyc.org/history.html), was initially formed out of the merger of two organizations: the New York Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the New York City Partnership. The New York Chamber of Commerce was founded on April 5, 1768 by a group of merchants whose purpose was to encourage business and industry, . . . the Chamber remained sufficiently loyal to the [British] Crown to have received a royal charter in 1770 from King George III, . . . After the [Revolutionary] war, . . . the New York State Legislature . . . confirm[ed] their original charter [on April 13, 1784] . . . entitled "An Act to Remove Doubts Concerning the Chamber of Commerce and to Confirm the Rights and Privileges Thereof." . . . Following in the tradition of three generations of Rockefellers who were closely associated with the Chamber, David Rockefeller transformed the organization in 1979. In that year, he founded the New York City Partnership and affiliated it with the Chamber. Although the original Chamber had taken a broad look at what it considered to be “business interests”, it was primarily a business advocacy group. Under Rockefeller's vision, the new Partnership would allow business leaders to work more directly with government and other civic groups to address broader social and economic problems in a ‘hands on’ way. In 2002, the New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce became the Partnership for New York City. . . .”

i.Rupert Murdock is Co-Chairman with Honorary Co-Chairman David Rockefeller in the PNYC.

j.Rupert Murdock’s mother, Elisabeth Murdock is Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire, established by King George V; a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC), which is an order established by Elizabeth II, Queen of Australia. Elisabeth Murdock administers the Royal Woman’s Hospital in Victoria, Australia, a vaccine research center and heavy promoter of the swine flu vaccines and drugs for pregnant women.　　

k.Jerry I Speyer, owner of the Rockefeller Center, is chair emeritus of the PNYC and on their board of directors. He is Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Tishman Speyer, Chairman of the Museum of Modern Art, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; chairman emeritus of Columbia University; chairman emeritus of the Real Estate Board of New York; and a member of the David Rockefeller-directed Council on Foreign Relations.

l.Nelson Rockefeller’s protégé, Dr. Henry Kissinger, is a highly influential member of The Council on Foreign Relations, composed of the most influential business leaders in America, and his Kissinger Associates, Inc. is Merck and Company, Inc.’s leading management consulting firm.

m.Merck and Company, Inc. is the world’s largest vaccine maker. The company not only profits from flu frights and pandemics by sales of Pneumovax, but also is credited for having spread the AIDS virus, HIV, through contaminated hepatitis B vaccines according to research published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Medical Hypotheses (Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 677-686) by this affiant.

n.Further evidencing an Anglo-American conspiracy to commit iatro-genocide using vaccines, a CSL Biotherapies report (See: EXHIBIT_10.pdf) proves this firm operates one of the world’s largest influenza vaccine manufacturing facilities for supply to Australia and global markets. This facility is based in Parkville, Victoria. This document explains the vaccine manufacturing process and exclusive supply of viruses for vaccine research and manufacture from the WHO or the CDC, thusly:

“The first step in making the influenza vaccine is preparing a ‘seed’ virus. This is a safe form of the influenza virus, which can be grown in hens’ eggs to produce the vaccine. Preparation of the seed takes around 3-4 weeks following receipt of a potential candidate virus from international health bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) or the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”

o.So Ruben O. Donis at the CDC had to have sent the H1N1 and H5N1 viruses needed for vaccine manufacture to Novavax, where the CDC’s former Dr. Rick Bright, is now implicated in this conspiracy to commit genocide by way of flu vaccines.

p.CSL’s primary H1N1 swine flu vaccine testing site is closely linked to Rupert Murdock. Murdock funds the Murdock Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) of Victoria, Australia. His daughter-in-law, Sarah Murdock, is an Ambassador for the MCRI, and a member of its development board since 2000. Murdock’s mother’s, Royal Woman’s Hospital is testing the H1N1 vaccines, at the time of this writing, on children and pregnant women.

q.The Associate Director of Clinical Development for vaccines at CSL is Dr. Michael Greenberg. CSL is conducting H1N1 vaccine studies on babies at the Murdock Children’s Research Institute, according to the MCRI website. (See:EXHIBIT_10.pdf) Dr. Greenberg joined GlaxoSmithKline in 2005, and CSL in 2009, further evidencing Rupert Murdock’s ties to SmithKline and CSL.

r.The MCRI is the largest child health research and vaccine testing institute in Australia. It researches childhood diseases, including many that are vaccine-induced autoimmune diseases associated with antigenic complex formation from geneto-protein recombinations and blood intoxications.

s.Antigenic complex formation is the primary mechanism recognized by immunologists for the generation of myriad auto-immune diseases that result from vaccine-induced/unnatural over-stimulation of the immune system whereafter immune cells are hyper-activated to autogenically attack the body instead of simply the infectious agent/ pathogen or antigen. The medical community calls this auto-immune dysfunction.

t.In September 2009, babies and children were being recruited by the MCRI, for “a pandemic H1N1 swine flu vaccine trial” in Melbourne wherein “about 100 Victorian children aged between 6 months to eight years” were selected for study in collaboration with the University of Melbourne and Federal Government of Australia.

u.This historic testimony evidencing fraud and ongoing genocide within the medical and public health sectors of the WHO-directed US, UK, and Australian governments is best reconciled by medical sociologist Stephen Kunitz’s 2000 report in the Journal of the American Public Health Association (Vol 90;10:1531-39) wherein he concluded wherever Anglo-American multi-national corporations travel, so goes genocidal depopulation of native people.

v.Now this affiant is aware that White House Environmental Advisor for Barack Obama, Van Jones, resigned for signing a petition in 2004 asking for an investigation of high level Bush administration officials implicated by foreknowledge in the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center “terrorist” attacks that immediately killed more than 3,000 people and many more from respiratory related ailments.

w.This infamous New York site is now home to the PNYC—the world’s most powerful biotechnology trust established by David Rockefeller in 1979 with co-partner and co-chairman Ruppert Murdock.

x.It must be known that New York’s United Nations building was constructed using Rockefeller money. The United Nations’s WHO was established thereafter by the Rockefeller family's foundation in 1948--the year after the same Rockefeller cohort established the CIA. Two years later the Rockefeller Foundation established the U.S. Government's National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Health (NIH), and earlier, the nation's Public Health Service (PHS).**

y.It must be further understood that England’s colonialism has transitioned into neocolonialism, commonly called globalism. British influence has evolved most apparently and consistently with financial support by the European banking community led by the Rothchild family that has, according to geopolitical and economic historians, heavily financed Rockefeller family interests since the late 1800s, and vaccination campaigns have been a part of this global conquest agenda.

z.Population reduction by vaccination for eugenics and genocide has earlier examples. Kunitz wrote about the Yanomami Anglo-American genocide in Venezuela. In 1968, very deadly and obviously contraindicated Edmonson B measles vaccine was administered by James V. Neel and colleagues to conduct genetic studies funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and US Atomic Energy Commission that maintains obvious ties to British commissioners. This vaccine caused the death of several thousand Yanomami. Lesser-known examples of vaccine-induced genocides involve the polio and hepatitis B vaccines as published by this affiant in 2000 in the journal Medical Hypotheses; and the Tuberculosis skin testing genocide ongoing in Hawaii as published in Medical Veritas in 2007 (4:1505–1509).

aa.The eugenics movement began at Rockefeller and Carnegie funded Cold Spring Harbor Labs in New York. Eugenics investors in genetic engineering and “population management” extended their institutional control over Nazi Germany; advancing “showers” with IG Farben and Bayer Corporation supplied Zyclone B. Concentration camp victims believed they were taking showers for “public health” and “disinfection,” not for “racial hygiene.” Later eugenics “experiments” included Tuskeegee’s syphilis study administered on behalf of Rockefeller interests by the U.S. Public Health Service.

bb.I testify as an expert in medical sociology and vaccine virology this is not “conspiracy theory,” but a certifiable “conspiracy reality” operating in health science sustained by a “conspiracy of silence” infecting responsible journalists, the media, and the American people. It is a sociopolitical pathology preventable only by the free exercise of our First Amendment right to a free press. Given the manner in which the defendants control the media, however, including the medical scientific media, America’s founding fathers objective to secure civil rights and happiness by way of a free press has been substantially negated by these criminals.

cc.In the United States, the NIH, PHS, and the American Academy of Pediatricians (AAP) have incestuous relationships with “BigPharma” and its ring of organized PNYC criminals. These agencies and official agents minimize vaccination risks, deny vaccine ingredient toxicities (e.g., mercury and the vaccine additive MF59 (Novartis/CHIRON) or ASO2-4 (Glaxo-SmithKlein) containing squalene and IL-2); and promote vaccination policies ignoring reason and legitimate cautions based on published science.

dd.The reach and impact of the defendants’ trust, the PNYC, obviously taints geopolitics, economics, and vaccine science globally. For example, according to recent Biomedical Research Alliance promotions, and PNYC promotions, Kathryn S. Wylde, the President and CEO of the PNYC since 1982, was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 2009. She describes Asian financial influence on the PNYC thusly:

ee.“The announcement of the China Center is a step toward economic recovery for New York. The Vantone Group's commitment to helping New York become the western headquarters location for the increasing number of global businesses coming out of China is extremely important to our city’s future as a global capital of business and finance.”

ff.The “China Center” lease is being administered by Silverstein Properties, Inc. a “partner company” in the PNYC. It is owned by Larry A. Silverstein, the infamous real estate tycoon, and alleged heroin drug trafficker, who cashed in on his timely $3.2 billion lease of the World Trade Center property seven weeks before “9-11” (2001). The subsidiary of GE Capitol, Industrial Risk Insurers company, paid some of Mr. Silverstein alleged loss of $7 billion needed to reconstruct the new World Trade Center.

gg.The top 5 floors of this new construction, “Chinese Center” is administered by Vantone Group director Feng Lun (pronounced Fung LEW-in).

hh.Feng Lun, according to Mr. Silverstein’s press announcement, is “a pioneer of China's booming real estate market, so influential that some of the biggest names in American real estate, like Jerry Speyer, Mortimer Zuckerman and Sam Zell, have expressed an interest in forming a partnership with him.”[Emphasis added.](See: EXHIBIT_11.pdf.)

ii.The Mortimer B. Zuckerman Research Center (MBZRC) is the namesake created by the chairman and co-founder of the publicly traded Boston Properties, also a partner company in PNYC. The Center is associated the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Rockefeller University. Zuckerman is also editor-in-chief of U.S. News and World Report and publisher of the Daily News. A Harvard Law grad, he is also member of the Council on Foreign Relations largely directed by honorary PNYC chairman, David Rockefeller. Mr. Zuckerman is a fixture on Sunday talk shows like The McLaughlin Group. Zuckerman is reported to have an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion. Mr. Zuckerman, a candidate for US Ambassador to Israel, is also a leading financier of the American Lyme Disease Foundation that heavily promoted SmithKline company’s disastrous Lymerix vaccine. This vaccine was pulled from the market following hundreds-of-thousands of reported cases of recipients suffering post-vaccination symptoms of Lyme disease.

jj.Another major promoter and Federal Government endorser of SmithKlein’s toxic and terminated Lyme disease vaccine is the US Federal Government’s, National Institute of Health, National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director, Anthony S. Fauci, upon whom Mr. Zuckerman bestowed an “America’s Best Leaders” award on November 24, 2008.

kk.At this same meeting Mr. Zuckerman provided the same award to David Baltimore, the senior pioneer of retroviral research associated with HIV/AIDS-like immunodeficiency bioengineering during the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP).

ll.The SVCP was speciously investigated in 2002 by the United States General Accounting Office (GAO-02-809R Origin of AIDS Virus), that concluded its fraudulent study in June 17, 2002. The investigation was forced by persecuted, and later incarcerated, Honorable Ohio Congressman, James A. Traficant, Jr. Mr. Traficant has decried his persecution by a “Jewish conspiracy” with intimate ties to Israel and intelligence organizations that adequately describes the defendants in this case.

mm.The SVCP is undoubtedly linked to the origin of HIV/AIDS as evidenced by its documentation revealing HIV co-discoverer, Dr. Robert Gallo, and his employment with the National Cancer Institute overseeing Litton Bionetics’s contract (71-2025) (See: EXHIBIT 12) “Investigation of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates,” as “Project Officer.” This document relates to the Merck company SVCP contract (71-2059) “Oncogenic Virus Research and Vaccine Development,” directed by Dr. Maurice Hilleman. (See: EXHIBIT 13.pdf)

nn.Before his death, Dr. Hilleman, Merck’s vaccine division chief, stated that he brought the AIDS virus into North America in contaminated monkeys destined for vaccine research at Merck. This suppressed interview was posted by this affiant on You Tube where it is currently viewable, (See: YouTube’s “Merck Vaccine Chief Brings HIV/AIDS to America”)

oo.Litton Bionetics also exclusively administered the NCI’s facilities at Fort Detrick, Maryland at the time Litton supplied chimpanzees were used by the CDC, FDA, NIAID, and the Merck drug company to produce four subtypes of hepatitis B virus vaccines for testing on at least three known populations: 1. homosexual men in New York City, 2. African villagers in Zaire/Congo/Uganda, and 3. Willowbrook State School for mentally retarded children on Staten Island in New York. The latter studies were conducted under U.S Army contract with the New York University Medical Center’s Dr. Saul Krugman. (See: EXHIBIT_14.pdf)

pp.Thus, the leading HIV/AIDS institute in the US, the NIAID, directed by the leading American infectious disease official, HIV/AIDS czar, and leading swine flu vaccination proponent, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has grossly and criminally neglected compelling documents and solid science that indicts Merck, the FDA, CDC, and his own NIAID. The suppressed and neglected evidence proves the origin of the world’s deadliest plague, AIDS, was triggered by hepatitis B vaccinations advanced by this alliance between these defendants’ public and private enterprises.
(See: EXHIBIT_15.pdf)

qq.Additional analysis of published genetic analyses concordant with this suppressed thesis and documented history of the SVCP, and related HIV activity, will prove to any reasonable person the NIAID played a central role in the aforementioned hepatitis B vaccine studies. (See: USDHEW Virology: Volume 4—Control of Viral Infections. NIAID Task Force Report. Bethesda, MD: Public Health Service, NIH, 79-1834, 1979, p. 20; 65-78) (See again: EXHIBIT_15.pdf)

rr.Related to current swine flu propaganda, the NIAID director, Dr. Fauci, has been heavily promoting swine flu vaccinations by way of the defendants’ media properties as he did previously with the Lyme vaccine.

ss.Dr Fauci was also senior author on the New England Journal of Medicine’s article detailing a suspiciously incomplete developmental history of this novel H1N1 virus.(See: NEJM Vol. 361;3:225-229, July 16, 2009.

tt.The NIAID and Dr. Fauci operates subject to Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) review and direction according to CIA documentation and the Washington Post.(See: EXHIBIT_16.pdf)

uu.Dr. Fauci is also co-patent holder (No. 5,696,079; Dec. 9, 1997) (See: EXHIBIT_17.pdf.) on “Immunologic enhancement with intermittent interleukin-2 therapy” described as being central to gene therapies and the future of “geneto-pharmaceuticals.” The Assignee on this patent is: The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health (Washington, DC).

vv.The Associated Press reported that the government owns the patents and the scientists are listed as inventors so they can share in licensing deals struck with private manufacturers. . . . Fauci received $45,072.82 in royalties since 1997 when the government licensed the treatment they invented to drug maker Chiron Corp. Fauci, allegedly, donated his royalties to charity to avoid conflict-of-interest charges. But he admitted it was his decision to make to withhold disclosures to patients undergoing tests of IL-2 under his supervision.

ww.Thus, Dr. Fauci’s co-patent filing evidences entrepreneurship of the US Federal Government, through its Department of Health, at the expense of taxpayers, in this valuable biotechnology now licensed to CHIRON Corporation, makers of the swine flu vaccine adjuvant additive MF59 with squalene. (See: EXHIBIT_18.pdf.)

xx.I am aware of substantial scientific evidence, some of which was attended by the United States Congress during its investigation into Gulf War Syndrome, that squalene adjuvant is implicated in poisoning masses of military personnel who received the anthrax vaccine.

yy.Regarding the history of IL-2, now in vaccine adjuvant, on Monday, Oct. 6, 2008, Dr. John Niederhuber, the director of the NCI, told Lawrence K. Altman of the New York Times that Dr. Gallo "was instrumental in every major aspect of the discovery of the AIDS virus." He added: "Dr. Gallo discovered interleukein-2 (Il-2), an immune system signaling molecule, which was necessary for the discovery of the AIDS virus, serving as a co-culture factor that allowed the virus to grow.” Dr. Fauci added to this, "There's no doubt that Bob Gallo made enormous contributions to AIDS research, and if the Nobel rules allowed four recipients, Bob would belong in the group". . . .

zz.I am also aware that IL-2 is the “common denominator” among immune system functions, (See: EXHIBIT_19.pdf) and can cause severe side effects. IL-2 has been recommended for adjuvants. (See: EXHIBIT_20.pdf) New research on Dr. Fauci’s IL-2 in the “proprietary” formula of swine flu vaccine adjuvants show IL-2 caused no benefit whatsoever stimulating the immune systems of 5,8000 subjects at a cost of $85 million. CHIRON and taxpayers paid the tab. Yet, more money and time will be spent researching Drs. Fauci and Gallo’s darling drug.

aaa.Regarding the other principle ingredient in adjuvants, according to Dr. Andrus Brun Laursen, the amount of squalene in the Pandremix vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKlein is far more concentrated in the swine flu vaccine than in anthrax vaccine implicated in producing Gulf War Syndrome.

bbb.CHIRON’s MF59 adjuvant used in the 2009 swine flu vaccines by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, and Merck’s Lymerix vaccines, contain squalene along with Dr. Fauci’s co-patented Interleuken-2, preferred by the drug trade due to its toxic side effects as this makes money for shareholders in BigPharma.(See: EXHIBIT_20.pdf)

ccc.The aforementioned evidences how the American people are being psychologically abused--“brain-washed,” sensitized, and traumatized--by the trust’s media; and physically assaulted with painful poisonous injections delivering blood contaminations to the ill-informed generally objecting public.

ddd.From the view of theologians, people shall reap what they sew--humanity is being seduced by persuasive media to be physically poisoned by misplaced faith in the CDC, FDA, AAP, NIAID, PHS, NCI; and in Novartis, Novavax, SmithKlein, Merck, CSL, and Baxter Corporation’s vaccines. Rather than reinforcing the sacred dictim, “In God We Trust,” the PNYC trust conditions people to place faith in medical deities (MDs) to advance an obviously genocidal agenda--the 2009 Swine Flu vaccination campaign. Thus, the constitutionally guaranteed religious freedom from “mandated” blood intoxications (as per Leviticus 19:19) are being attacked and suppressed by Anglo-American agents for David Rockefellers PNYC trust.

eee.Among the trust’s deceptive, coercive, unethical, and fraudulent media machinations is their promoted myth that vaccinations are “mandatory” when, by Constitutional law, they shall be voluntary for all who honor of religious beliefs and others philosophically-inclined to refuse given equal protection under the law.

fff.Another second key deception is the notion that “immunization” means “vaccination” or visa versa; when, in fact, “immunization” traditionally referred to a natural exposure to antigens and innate immune response associated with acquiring lasting natural immunity. The word “vaccination,” alternatively, refers to a medical procedure that typically triggers hyper-sensitization reactions within the lymphatic system.

ggg.Another fraudulent myth is that the FDA tests products and/or assures safety and efficacy of vaccines. This myth persists due to continuous reinforcement by the news media controlled by the trust, and brainwashed or blindly-biased health officials that repeat this seductive mantra--”vaccines are safe and effective.”

hhh.These intentional obfuscations by the media and institutionalized medicine and public health, manipulated and misdirected by the trust, illustrate the social engineering and cross-cultural suppression of native and traditional beliefs in natural healing, immuno-competence, and spiritual metaphysics involved in natural healing, sustaining wellness, and spontaneous recovery.

iii. And unless We the People diagnose and treat the root causes of this genocidal imposition--a psycho-social, geopolitical, economically debilitating, physically-enslaving pathology, humanity may literally go extinct from genetic mutations and chemical intoxications.

jjj. Alternatively, the recognition and celebration of spiritual immunity bio-energetically commanding natural physical immunity through electro-genetic and hydrosonic processes, must be reexamined and culturally restored. As spiritual beings, humans deserve spiritual solutions more than physical chemical intoxications. The suppressed fields of homeopathy and electroacupuncture demonstrate conclusively efficacy in this regard; yet we see no homeopaths in American hospitals today.

kkk.Supermarkets are even used to peddle vaccines as if medical markets are insufficient. “Safeway” stores seduce shoppers in the US and UK offering 10% discounts to anyone impulsively inoculated. Who saves? The company owner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts is partnered with several members of Rockefeller’s PNYC trust. Moreover, Safeway’s CEO, Steven H. Burd, is Founder of the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform (CAHR), the movement’s most outspoken salesman. Allied members include: Merck & Company, Inc., Glaxo-SmithKlein, Eli Lily and Company, Pfizer Inc., and America’s leading vaccine testing organization Kaiser Permanente.(See: EXHIBIT_22.pdf)

lll. Beyond this gross criminal seduction that neglects natural, alternative and complementary care in “health care reform,” the obvious intent of the Federal Government officials, in partnerships and collaborations with pharmaceutical and media industrialists, to engage in organized crime by conspiring to commit psychological warfare to effect a genocidal vaccination agenda is proven by:

i)Gross chronic criminal irresponsibility for safety testing lasting adequate lengths of time to provide reasonable assurances that new or old vaccines are safe, and will not cause disease or premature death months and years after inoculations.

ii)Reliance of Federal licensing officials on studies and data exclusively provided by drug companies--vaccine makers who have consistently manipulated data for profit.

iii)Gross criminal neglect of readily available, lower-to-no cost, risk reducing/zeroing, highly reliable natural alternatives to risky vaccinations and chemotherapies for the flu (e.g., Tamiflu), such as mega-doses of Vitamins C and D, or the new silver hydrosols (e.g., OxySilver). If health officials were not subject to a drug-cult mentality they would be educating the public appropriately how to avoid or recover most naturally and cost-effectively from the flu.

iv)Gross criminal malfeasance in co-creating persuasive deadly propaganda that generates fears and phobias in people everywhere adding to the psychosocial, economic, and ecological burdens of water polluting and behavior modification from antidepressant drugs’ uses and abuses.

v)Gross criminal failure of Federal officials to establish legitimate vaccine reaction reporting, data collection, injury analysis, and compensation protocols. Today, certifiable reporting of vaccination injuries and illnesses are grossly/criminally neglected, often intentionally hidden; and compensation is non-existent for the vast majority of people injured. For instance, the “Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase I, Update 2/29/00” produced for the CDC, then censored and later altered before publication, gives officials fraudulent information and license to claim mercury in vaccines and recipients is safe at concentrations far exceeding Environmental Protection Agency toxic dose limits. (EXHIBIT_23.pdf)

vi)Deliberate obfuscation of the meanings of the words “vaccination” and “immunization,” the former reflecting an administrative process imposing man-made intoxication, the later a natural defense process that develops following natural exposures to germs.

vii)Gross criminal neglect of common sense and reasoned analysis regarding the epidemiological tracking of the 2009 H1N1 flu outbreak’s origin; purposefully evading substantial evidence that the current pandemic virus appeared suddenly, suspiciously, unnaturally, and immediately following companies in the PNYC trust issuing vaccine sales propaganda.

viii)Gross criminal breach of obtaining adequate informed consent for medical experimentation using inadequately tested vaccines. Obviously, new H1N1 swine flu vaccines containing “live” “mock” viruses, “fast-tracked” to provide only a few weeks of safety testing are risky. It is scientifically established, widely known, and criminally neglected that autoimmune reactions to vaccinations and even cancers caused by recombination of unstable viruses commonly take place months or even years to develop following vaccinations.

ix)Gross criminal breach of informed consent while “mandating” medical experimentation in recipients of new H1N1 swine flu vaccines containing “live” “mock” viruses that are genetically engineered and expected to recombine with other circulating viruses potentially creating more potent pathogenic strains of flu and more dangerous pandemics.

x)Fraudulent inducements of people of all ages to accept “mandatory” vaccinations for access to schools and workplaces, to avoid fines and quarantines, and/or to avoid persecution by social service agents and agencies involving child custody battles with officials trained and paid to condemn vaccine objectors.

xi)Gross neglect of human rights and US Constitutional freedoms of: religion, the press, and to life, liberty, and personal pursuits because Federal officials overstep their statutory authorities when “mandating” vaccinations, even during declared epidemics.

xii)Official malfeasance and neglect of 4th Amendment rights of people to be secure in their persons and houses, without threat of unwanted invasions of their bodies and properties.

xiii)Official malfeasance and neglect of people’s 5th Amendment rights to secure life, liberty, or personal property, including their body sovereigns, and due process of law;

xiv)Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Without compensating people for the taking of their natural immunity, and natural immune system function, due to the medical intervention and immunological intoxication called vaccination, this Constitutional right is grossly subverted.

xv)Gross criminal neglect of the US Genocide Accountability Act of 2007, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 50A, § 1091 wherein “We The People of the United States of America,” by way of forced, fraudulently coerced, or extortionately compelled vaccinations, are:

(1)being killed in sufficient numbers to initiate this complaint and charge of genocide;
(2)submitting to serious bodily injury;
(3)being permanently impaired in mental faculties through drugs, including Tamiflu, and by mercury in vaccines linked to neuro-developmental and behavioral disorders in children, and aluminum in vaccines potentially triggering or aggravating Alzheimer’s dementia;
(4)subject to conditions of life under “mandatory” vaccination containing human sterilizers, toxic chemicals, and foreign genetic materials that are intended to cause the physical destruction of fertility and immunity as it these occur naturally in human bodies according to God’s laws; and
(5)subject to common side effects requiring detoxification, natural remediation, or risky medical interventions yielding further intoxications depopulating the group in whole or in part;
(6)imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group as has been documented in Vaccine Wkly (1995 May 29 - Jun 5:9-10) wherein it states, “[T]etanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities.” (It should be noted that Barack Obama’s science czar, John Holdren, co-authored the book Ecoscience in 1977 calling for population reduction through the use of sterilizing vaccinations);
(7)transfers by force of children of one social group to another group is prohibited under the anti-genocide act--precisely what happened to my daughter in Hawaii forced to leave High School for failing to become intoxicated by vaccinations and TB tests. This is happening throughout America when unvaccinated children are forced to take the injection or else suffer the stigma of allegedly presenting greater risk to the community of vaccinated children. This policy is psychologically and emotionally abusive; whereas the vaccination alternative is physically intoxicating, generally stressful, and chronically debilitating.

20.In conclusion, compelling evidence in this sworn affidavit including EXHIBITS 1 thru 23 is sufficient to persuade most reasonable people that dangerous conflicts of interest between US Federal health officials and this Rockefeller-established trust are grossly genocidal and frankly criminal. This cartel of drug/media industrialists are killing far more than 1 million Americans annually according to my highly conservative calculations as an expert in this field.

21.For reasons written above, I pray that this honorable Court will carefully examine the evidence exhibited and referenced herein, and rule judiciously by granting an immediate injunction on the FDA’s licensing and health agencies’ administration of the specious swine flu vaccines until this urgent evidencing of genocide and anti-trust violations can be sufficiently studied and due process of law applied.

22.I declare under penalty of law that the foregoing is true and accurate.

DATED: August 22, 2009
_______________________
Leonard George Horowitz
State of Washington
County of Pend Oreille

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this _________________ [day of month] day of _________________ [month], 20____.
[Notary Seal:]


__________________________________
[signature of Notary]



RELEVANT FEDERAL LAWS BEING BROKEN

Below is a list of statutes that relate to the criminal violations attested to and evidenced above:


Antitrust Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, provides criminal sanctions against any person "who shall make any contract or engage in any conspiracy" in restraint of commerce. A civil plaintiff must establish that: (1) two or more entities formed a combination or conspiracy; (2) the combination or conspiracy produces, or potentially produces, an unreasonable restraint of trade or commerce; and (3) the restrained trade or commerce is interstate in nature. In a criminal antitrust prosecution, the government must also prove that the defendants intended to restrain commerce and acted with knowledge of the probable consequences of their actions. (e.g., United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 444 (1978).


Restraint of commerce, vaccine barons suppress publicity for silver hydrosols (e.g., OxySilver), and persecute those who promote natural methods and materials for prevention and cure through the FDA and FCC.

Commerce is defined as:

The exchange of commodities for commodities. Considered in a legal point of view, it consists in the various agreements which have for their object to facilitate the exchange of the products of the earth or industry of man, with an intent to realize a profit.

Commodities is defined as:

Any tangible good or product that is the subject of sale or barter.

The PNYC trust conducts commerce that violates:

(1) the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, which is designed to control and minimize the effects of water pollution by either prohibiting or regulating the discharge of pollutants into water;

People who consume medications urinate and defecate drugs now causing people to consume unwittingly, and without consent, toxic pharmaceuticals. . . .

(2) Safe Drinking Water Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 300f et seq., which regulates and controls the discharge of harmful contaminants into public water systems as well as the underground injection of contaminants into groundwater that supplies public water systems;

(3) Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2692, which imposes criminal sanctions for the knowing violation of the Act which regulates the manufacture, processing distribution or disposal of chemicals that pose an unreasonable risk of injury to the public or environment; and

(4) The False Claims Act of 1863, 18 U.S.C. § 287, provides criminal penalties for the presenting of a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim to a federal agency. This statute has been liberally construed, enabling the government to use it to prosecute a wide array of offenses, including fraudulent federal tax refunds, Medicare and Medicaid Fraud, Social Security Fraud, government contract irregularities and fraudulent claims for unperformed services under government contracts.

Drug industrialists are routinely making false claims, and advancing false study data, to FDA officials who typically overlook the frauds.

Congressional amendments to the False Claim Act in 1986 blurred the dividing line between criminal actions and civil false claims, by strengthening "qui tam" actions. As a result, private citizens may recover up to 25% of a government recovery where the government intervenes and up to 30% where the government does not intervene. Thus, private citizens have a powerful tool and may play an important role in prosecutorial decisions. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729- 3733. The Act provides both for treble damages and a civil penalty of $5,000 to $10,000 per false claim.

Federal Conflict Of Interest Statutes

A. 18 U.S.C. § 201 prohibits the bribery of, or the giving of illegal gratuities, to a public official with the intent to influence the official in carrying out an official act.

B. 18 U.S.C. § 203 criminalizes the use of a public office for private gain, whether it be by the officeholder/employee or by an outside individual attempting to influence the governmental official. The "matters" covered include a "contract, claim, controversy . . . [or] charge.

C. Ethics Reform Acts, flowing from Watergate and other public scandals, have imposed criminal sanctions for numerous other actions by public officials and private citizens making criminal use of a public office for private gain. See Note, The Congressional Ethics Dilemma: Constituent Service or Conflict of Interest?, 28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 343 (1991).

The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-394, provides for criminal sanctions and forfeiture as part of its scheme to prevent deleterious, adulterated or misbranded articles from entering interstate commerce. Under this Act, "food" is defined to include "(1) articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, (2) chewing gum, and (3) articles used for components of any such article." 21 U.S.C. § 321(f).

Health Care Fraud

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, P.L. 104-191, created five new health care fraud crimes and expanded existing money laundering, asset forfeiture and fraud injunction statutes to cover "federal health care offenses." These new crimes, which mirror existing white collar offenses such as mail and wire fraud, embezzlement, false statements and obstruction of justice, provide for jail terms of up to 10 years.


B. 18 U.S.C. §982: "The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from the gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense."


D. 18 U.S.C. §1347: "Whoever knowingly and willfully executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice (1) to defraud any health care benefit program; or (2) to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses . . . any of the money of . . . any health care benefit program" shall be sentenced up to 10 years in prison and fined up to $250,000.

E. 18 U.S.C. §1518: Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses is punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a fine of as much as $250,000.

F. 18 U.S.C. §1956: Money laundering statutes apply to the "laundering" of funds derived from the proceeds from health care offenses, allowing for prison sentences of up to 20 years and fines up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved.

G. 18 U.S.C. §3486: Administrative demands are authorized. The federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and its qui tam or "whistleblower" provisions, which reward private citizens who help the government discover fraudulent claims, are also applicable to health care providers who submit Medicare or other federal funds claims.

Mail And Wire Fraud

The federal mail and wire fraud statutes are the "prosecutor's darling." They criminalize "the full range of consumer frauds, stock frauds, land frauds, bank frauds, insurance frauds, and commodity frauds [as well as] blackmail, counterfeiting, election fraud and bribery." Rakoff, The Federal Mail Fraud Statute (Part 1), 18 Duq. L. Rev. 771 (1980). These statutes are frequently utilized to bring federal prosecutions for what would otherwise be state court offenses.

The Mail Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, provides criminal sanctions for those who:
(1)engage in a scheme or artifice to defraud;
(2)with an intent to defraud;
(3)using the mails to further the fraudulent scheme.

The Wire Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, contains nearly identical language as the Mail Fraud Statute and prohibits fraud or wire communications.

Money Laundering

The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956-1957, was enacted to deter organized crime and narcotics traffickers from "money laundering," defined as the process by which one conceals the existence, illegal source, or illegal application of income, and disguises that income to make it appear legitimate.

This Act provides criminal sanctions for anyone who conducts a monetary transaction knowing, or with reason to know, that the funds involved were derived from unlawful activity.

While this Act was aimed at "the lifeblood of organized crime," it has been utilized by prosecutors against numerous corporations and otherwise legitimate businesses because it enables prosecutors to reach proceeds of criminal conduct, such as tax offenses.

Obstruction Of Justice

The Obstruction of Justice and Perjury statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501 et seq., are popular statutes for federal prosecutors. These laws, which are designed to protect the integrity of judicial proceedings -- before grand juries, federal agencies and Congress -- are often utilized to pursue criminal investigations, with otherwise marginal evidence of substantive offenses, because of (a) concealment, alteration or destruction of documents; or (b) encouraging or rendering of false testimony.

RICO Offenses

Over the past decade, federal prosecutors have turned to the "RICO" (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970) statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, as a tool in enterprise affecting interstate commerce; (b) acquiring or maintaining through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt an interest in an enterprise affecting interstate commerce; (c) conducting or participating in the conduct of, through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt, the affairs of an enterprise affecting interstate commerce; or (d) conspiring to participate in any of these activities.

Federal prosecutors utilize the RICO statute as a powerful weapon to prosecute offenses such as mail and wire fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and securities fraud. Prosecutors also take advantage of the statute's provisions authorizing courts to enter restraining orders prior to conviction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property.

While enacted in 1970 as a "frontal attack" on organized crime, prosecutors have taken advantage of the Act's specific statement that it should be interpreted "liberally . . . to effectuate its remedial purposes" to justify its use in other contexts.

The Act prohibits "any person" from: (a) using income received from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire an interest in an enterprise affecting interstate commerce; (b) acquiring or maintaining through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt an interest in an enterprise affecting interstate commerce; (c) conducting or participating in the conduct of, through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt, the affairs of an enterprise affecting interstate commerce; or (d) conspiring to participate in any of these activities. 　　

Tags:　　

Share  　　

×  WYZXWK.COM

您的打赏将用于网站日常运行与维护。
帮助我们办好网站，宣传红色文化！

欢迎扫描下方二维码，订阅网刊微信公众号