据新华社电 委内瑞拉代总统、执政党总统候选人尼古拉斯·马杜罗6日说,美前官员及国内右翼分子欲暗杀自己。同时警告那些在总统选举中不投票给他的人可能会遭遇厄运。
委内瑞拉定于本月14日举行总统选举。马杜罗和反对派阵营候选人恩里克·卡普里莱斯连日来奔走各地造势,相互“炮轰”。
马杜罗6日在亚马孙州一场竞选活动中说,“如果有人投票反对尼古拉斯·马杜罗,就是反对他自己”,可能会遭遇类似几个世纪前的厄运。他意指16世纪发生在这一丛林地区的“马卡拉巴纳之战”,印第安人战败后惨遭西班牙殖民者屠杀。
马杜罗头戴一顶当地土著帽子。他把反对派阵营比作当年的西班牙殖民者,“如果这些资产阶级赢得选举,就会私有化卫生和教育系统,从印第安人手中夺走土地”。
反对派候选人卡普里莱斯嘲弄这一说法。他回应:“他们(马杜罗阵营)已经绝望……他撒谎并恐吓民众。”
同一天,马杜罗还指认前美国官员罗杰·诺列加和奥托·赖克阴谋杀害他,以阻止他赢得选举。他说,萨尔瓦多的“右翼势力”同样参与这一阴谋,已雇佣杀手前往委内瑞拉。
“他们的目标是杀害我,”马杜罗说,“他们想杀死我,因为他们知道无法赢得自由和公正选举。”
诺列加和赖克均曾出任美国国务院分管西半球事务的副国务卿一职。
附文:乌有编译:美大使秘电爆出美国颠覆查韦斯政府计划
(乌有编译):据今日俄罗斯报道,前美驻委内瑞拉大使布朗·菲尔德曾专门为美国南方司令部撰写一份全面渗透和颠覆查韦斯政权的电报,这份电报被维基解密揭露。这份报告涉及自2004年以来,美在委内瑞拉的五个核心目标,包括“渗透入查韦斯的政治基础”、“分裂查韦斯主义”、“保护美国重要商业利益”和“在国际上孤立查韦斯”等。
美驻委内瑞拉大使馆,美国国际开发署(USAID )和转型首创办公室( OTI )参与了实现这些目标的一系列活动。而USAID 和 OTI 的大部分活动是为帮助大使实现渗透查韦斯政府和使查韦斯政党顺从美国的目标。这两个机构主要从事组织民间团体,他们认为组织民间团体对于实现民主越来越重要,并且查韦斯未能够全面控制这些民间团体。
总的说来,USAID大概花费了一百万美元,组织了3000个论坛,试图从根本上调和查韦斯的支持者和反对派,以此达到渐渐脱离“玻利瓦尔”左派组织。布朗·菲尔德还一度赞扬“民主在我们中间”的OTI公民教育计划。这项计划试图通过在低收入地区设立NGO来实现,目前已覆盖了60万的委内瑞拉民众。在2004到2006年间,USAID向300多个组织大约捐赠了1500万美元,并且通过OTI提供技术支持以加强民主体制。另外USAID还资助积极分子和反对派成员参加国外会议,宣扬对查韦斯政府的不满。
New WikiLeaks cable reveals US embassy strategy to destabilize Chavez government
原文链接:http://rt.com/news/wikileaks-venezuela-us-chavez-358/ Published time: April 04, 2013 23:56 Edited time: April 05, 2013 15:22
In a secret US cable published online by WikiLeaks, former ambassador to Venezuela, William Brownfield, outlines a comprehensive plan to infiltrate and destabilize former President Hugo Chavez' government.
Dispatched in November of 2006 by Brownfield -- now an Assistant Secretary of State -- the document outlined his embassy’s five core objectives in Venezuela since 2004, which included: “penetrating Chavez’ political base,” “dividing Chavismo,” “protecting vital US business” and “isolating Chavez internationally.”
The memo, which appears to be totally un-redacted, is plain in its language of involvement in these core objectives by the US embassy, as well as the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), two of the most prestigious agencies working abroad on behalf of the US.
According to Brownfield, who prepared the cable specifically for US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), the “majority” of both USAID and OTI activities in Venezuela were concerned with assisting the embassy in accomplishing its core objectives of infiltrating and subduing Chavez’ political party:
“This strategic objective represents the majority of USAID/OTI work in Venezuela. Organized civil society is an increasingly important pillar of democracy, one where President Chavez has not yet been able to assert full control.”
In total, USAID spent some one million dollars in organizing 3,000 forums that sought to essentially reconcile Chavez supporters and the political opposition, in the hopes of slowly weaning them away from the Bolivarian side.
Brownfield at one point boasted of an OTI civic education program named “Democracy Among Us,” which sought to work through NGOs in low income regions, and had allegedly reached over 600,000 Venezuelans.
In total, between 2004 and 2006, USAID donated some 15 million dollars to over 300 organizations, and offered technical support via OTI in achieving US objectives which it categorized as seeking to reinforce democratic institutions.
Much of the memo details efforts to highlight instances of human rights violations, and sponsoring activists and members of the political opposition to attend meetings abroad and voice their concerns against the Chavez administration:
“So far, OTI has sent Venezuelan NGO leaders to Turkey, Scotland, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Chile, Uruguay, Washington and Argentina (twice) to talk about the law. Upcoming visits are planned to Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia.”
In his closing comments, Brownfield remarked that, should President Chavez win re-election during the December 2006 elections, OTI expected the “atmosphere for our work in Venezuela” to become more complicated.
Ultimately, it seems that the former ambassador’s memo wisely predicted a change in conditions. Following his re-election, President Chavez threatened to eject the US ambassador from Venezuela in 2007, amid accusations of interfering in internal state affairs.
相关文章
「 支持!」
您的打赏将用于网站日常运行与维护。
帮助我们办好网站,宣传红色文化!