方舟子的要害在哪里？
-----------------
: 它山之石转载(常.国.紫.帆) [172032:12011], 17:18:35 09/30/2010:
- 论剑谈棋 豪杰尽聚 - 华岳论坛 - http://www.hua-yue.net/
送交者: forest 于 2010-10-01 04:14:22
身份疑惑。方舟子现在究竟是什么身份？中国国籍？美国国籍?美国绿卡？我印象中他曾经自己说过，因为有一次去领事馆办护照延期手续，开了6-7个小时车到了，结果离下班时间只剩5分钟，领事馆没有受理，让他再来一趟。方舟子一怒之下加入了美国国籍。好像还在新语丝网上讨论过入美国籍需要宣誓的问题，由此引起了对钱学森的质疑。所以我很怀疑他现在是美国公民。
如果是美国国籍，他现在中国自由打假，四处活动，有没有这种权利？有没有去过禁止外国人去的军事管辖区？有没有到相关机关办理过外国人居留手续？他目前住在新华社宿舍区，有没有泄露国家机密的可能？
如果是美国绿卡。那么他有没有定期回美国？有没有正式雇佣单位？有没有合法纳税？
如果是中国籍。那么他的新雨丝网站有没有正式在中国主管部门登记?有没有新闻出版署的执照？算不算私人非法结社？他的基金会有没有非法集资的嫌疑？
新语丝是在美国注册的，既然是外媒，那么他们的采访是否经过审批？
肖06年在美起诉他们时,方是美国公民,link见内
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_490f7660010005ot.html
美国之音，CNN都可以自由采访国内的人民和媒体？
方舟子在美被起诉之英文文书
NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------X
CHUAN-GUO XIAO, Index No.
Plaintiff,
- against - COMPLAINT
YI RAO, SHIMIN FANG and
NEW THREADS CHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY, INC.
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------X
Nature of the Action
1. Plaintiff, Chuan-Guo Xiao, brings this action for defamation to redress false written statements maliciously made and published by defendants. Plaintiff, a resident of Brooklyn is defamed in the article “My Opinions On The Libel Suit Brought by Xiao Chuan-Guo Against Fang Shi-Min,” (henceforth “My Opinions”) written by defendant YI RAO and published on the internet by defendants SHIMIN FANG and NEW THREADS CHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY, INC., and thereafter and as a result published by the print and internet editions of the People’s Daily, a leading Chinese-language news source. The article is a sustained and malicious assault upon plaintiff’s reputation, falsely and with malice claiming plaintiff has a “very low level of academic achievement” and has failed to demonstrate that “he really knows science at all,” plus other similar statements. The article goes on to state, falsely and with malice, that Plaintiff is either mentally retarded or a “psychopath.” The author claims himself qualified to make such judgments, since he is “very familiar with the Chinese biomedical community,” has “in depth knowledge about biomedical history and evolution in China,” is “well connected within international neuroscience circle.”
2. The truth is that Chun-Guo Xiao is a highly-regarded academic urologist who is internationally recognized for his pioneering work related to bladder problems related to spinal cord injury, and has pioneered a novel procedure for the rehabilitation of such spinal-cord related bladder dysfunction. This novel procedure has enabled victims of such injury to void without the aid of a catheter, thereby avoiding the serious risks of infection associated with constant catheter use and thereby increasing life expectancy.
3. Upon information and belief, defendants Yi Rao, Shimin Fang and New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. knew all of the true facts set forth in paragraph 2 above, yet they published the defamation knowing it was untrue and without regard to its effect on plaintiff.
4. As a result of these knowingly false assertions, plaintiff has suffered injury to his personal and professional reputation, great emotional and psychological distress, loss of business and career opportunities, and specifically was denied an appointment to the Chinese Academy of Science. All defendants are therefore jointly and severally liable for compensatory and exemplary damages.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) in that Plaintiff is a citizen of China domiciled in China, who resides in the State of New York as a lawful alien; defendant Yi Rao is a United States Citizen domiciled in the State of Illinois; defendant Shimin Fang is a United States Citizen domiciled in the State of California; and defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. is a New York State corporation with its principal place of business in New York State. The matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interests and costs, the sum specified by 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
6. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) because a substantial amount of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in the Southern District of New York.
THE PARTIES
Chun-Guo Xiao
7. Plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao, is a Clinical Associate Professor on the faculty of New York University School of Medicine. He is a citizen of China, maintains his domicile in China, and is an alien lawfully in this country, residing in Brooklyn, County of Kings, State of New York..
8. Throughout his career of public service and private practice, plaintiff has always developed an excellent reputation for academic, scientific and medical achievement in his profession. Doctor Xiao is the only person in the history of the American Urological Association to be the recipient of the distinguished Jack Lapides award on two separate occasions. This award is one given by the American Urological Association for outstanding work in the field of Urology.
9. Plaintiff's academic career, as well as his private medical practice depend on his reputation for academic, scientific, and medical achievement.
Yi Rao
10. Defendant Yi Rao is a professor of neurology at the North Western University School of Medicine, in Illinois
11. Upon information and belief, defendant Yi Rao is the author of “My Opinions.”
12. Defendant Yi Rao is a resident of Chicago, Illinois. He is a citizen of the United States.
New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc.
13. Upon information and belief, defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc., is a New York not-for-profit corporation, incorporated in Onandanga County, New York, and with its principal place of business in Liverpool, Onandanga County, New York. One of its primary business operations is the publication of New Threads magazine, a daily internet magazine. The defendant corporation and the magazine are operated by defendant Shimin Fang, who is also its President and Director of the defendant corporation. The defendant corporation is known for sensationalist journalism, particularly muckraking articles assaulting the reputations of prominent Chinese citizens.
14. Defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. published an online edition of the article “My Opinions” on or about September 6, 2006, and has continued to publish the article online thereafter.
Shimin Fang
15. Defendant Shimin Fang is the President and Director of defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. On prior occasions, not directly the subject of this lawsuit, defendant Shimin Fang wrote libelous claims about plaintiff, which he and New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. arranged to have published in the New Threads internet magazine. After plaintiff successfully sued Shimin Fang for libel for these statements, Shimin Fang, in retaliation and with malicious motives, arranged for the libelous article “My Opinion,” ostensibly written by Yi Rao, to be published by New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. and elsewhere.
16. Shimin Fang is a resident of the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. He is a citizen of the United States.
The Untrue Statements in “My Opinions”Concerning Chun-Guo Xiao
17. Defendant Yi Rao’s article, “My Opinion,” consists of a sustained assault upon plaintiff’s reputation, wherein defendant Yi Rao claims plaintiff has a “very low level of academic achievement” and has failed to demonstrate that “he really knows science at all” or is any better than “the students taught by my students,” and that “[i]f he ever becomes an academician, he will surely set the record for the lowest standing.” The article goes on to express defendant Yi Roa’s belief that Plaintiff must be mentally defective.
18. Although Yi Roa, in his article, continually and in an exaggerated tongue-in-cheek fashion, characterizes his defamatory statements as “opinions,” this is little more than a legalistic ploy, and evidently intended to be understood as such by the readers. The beginning of the article, Yi Roa strains to characterize himself as a person with connections and expertise within the international neuroscience community and the Chinese biomedical community, so as to establish that he is qualified to assess the academic reputation of Plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao.
19. An English Translation of “My Opinion” is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
20. The article “My Opinion,” in Chinese, continues to be disseminated widely throughout the United States and in other countries via the internet.
Defamation and Damages
21. The statements referred to in paragraph 15 above, published by defendants of and concerning plaintiff, are materially false and defamatory and impute to plaintiff general professional and academic incompetence, total lack of fitness for his profession, and even mental illness. Defendants published these statements wantonly and recklessly, with reckless disregard for its injurious effect upon plaintiff.
22. By reason of the above, plaintiff has suffered emotional anguish, and been injured in his character and reputation in the community, particularly in the Chinese-reading community, both professionally and otherwise, to his damage in the sum of (i) $500,000 in compensatory damages and (ii) $500,000 in exemplary damages in an amount that is a sufficient percentage of defendants' net worth to deter such conduct in the future.
First Cause of Action(Libel—Gross Irresponsibility as Against All Defendants)
23. Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 as if fully set forth herein.
24. In publishing the defamatory statements referred to in paragraph 15, defendants acted in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties.
Second Cause of Action(Libel—Actual Malice as Against All Defendants)
25. Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges paragraph 1 through 22 as if fully set forth herein.
26. At the time the defendants published the defamatory statements quoted in paragraph 15, they knew that they were false, or acted with reckless disregard of whether they were true or not.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao:
1. demands judgment against all defendants in an amount not less than $500,000, together with interest and the costs and disbursements of this action, reasonable attorneys' fees, and punitive damages in an amount not less than $500,000 or in an amount that is sufficient as a percentage of defendants' net worth to deter such conduct in the futures; and
2. requests such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York
October ___, 2006
______________________________
James B. LeBow
Attorney for Plaintiff
350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4710
New York, New York
(212) 868-3311
文章引用自：http://community.highai.com/blogs/jeanjark/archive/2006/11.aspx
*** 回应主帖
*** 返回论坛
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
跟帖目录:
方在1993年拿绿卡，现在应该是美国公民 - 末允 17:21:53 09/30/2010
另外，你转的法律文件也明确显示方是民是美国公民 - 末允 17:33:03 09/30/2010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
原 帖 [ 0 ]
方在1993年拿绿卡，现在应该是美国公民
五年以上，现没有正经工作，半年以上时间在美国以外的北京，基本上是一种美国公民的行为。
[ 1:84 ] 末允(秦.县.甘.莓) - 17:21:53 09/30/2010 *** 回 帖
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
原 帖 [ 1 ]
另外，你转的法律文件也明确显示方是民是美国公民
16. Shimin Fang is a resident of the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. He is a citizen of the United States.
[ 2:151 ] 末允(秦.县.甘.莓) - 17:33:03 09/30/2010 *** 回 帖
附文1：
方舟子是谁？
黎阳
2010．9．3．
华岳论坛
中国主流媒体非常津津乐道方舟子，使他名气很大，而且越来越大。然而奇怪的是那么热衷于报道方舟子的主流媒体却从不热衷于报道方舟子的真实身份，更对他的职业和收入三箴其口。
如果方舟子没有拼命推广转基因主粮，我对他的真正身份也没多大兴趣。然而很奇怪，一贯以疾恶如仇不容造假形象出现的方舟子偏偏在涉及中华民族生死存亡的转基因主粮安全性造假问题上一反常态，不但没有半点势不两立你死我活的打假劲头，反而满腔热情地为已经证明有害的转基因技术百般辩护，这就令我不得不问个为什么，想知道这个方舟子究竟是谁，干什么的，靠什么为生，跟美国孟山都转基因公司有没有利益关系。于是我从网络上搜索了一下有关方舟子这方面的信息，结果如下（见附录）。
如果方舟子真的拥有“美国永久居住证，并称其长期在美国居住”，那根据美国法律，他要保持美国永久居民（绿卡）身份，就必须每年在美国住满6个月以上，除非他是美国在华公司的正式雇员，工作场地就在中国。
然而根据报道，方舟子在中国没有工作，是靠“给国内一些媒体写文章”谋生的。如果真是这样，那他将无法保持自己的美国绿卡身份。
如果方舟子靠“给国内一些媒体写文章”就能获得足够的收入，在北京买房买车（“开的是普通的丰田车，住的是二居室”），那我倒很想知道方舟子的有酬劳的文章都有哪些，发表在哪些媒体上——既然是公开发表的，那就用不着保密，可以一一统计出来，证明收入足以维持其生活，以便向人们证实一点：他的打假文章跟他那些用以谋生的有偿支付的文章毫不相干。
如果方舟子不能证明自己是美国在华公司的正式雇员，那么他必须每年至少有6个月住到美国，他的护照上应该有相应的出入境记录。如果他不能出示他的这些出入境记录，又不肯承认他在中国受雇于美国公司，那只能证明他的雇主不能公开，也就是说，他有秘密的、见不得人的雇主，这才是他真正的经济来源。
方舟子既然做出一副光明磊落、疾恶如仇、眼睛里容不得沙子、跟一切造假势不两立的样子，既然跑到中国到处指手画脚，那就应该让中国人知道他究竟是谁：中国人？美国人？美国绿卡？那就应该把自己的真实身份、真实职业、真实收入来源如实告诉中国人，不造半点假，否则岂能让人不怀疑他有特殊身份、特殊使命、只打小假、掩护大假、表面为民除害，实际却为灭绝中华民族的转基因武器服务效劳？
=======================================
黎阳声明：本人放弃对此文的版权。只要不违背本文主旨，任何人均可转贴，可散发，可抄袭，可复制，可被冒名顶替，可被任何媒体拿去用，可被任何人引用到任何文章中且不写出引文出处，本人分文不取。
相关文章
「 支持！」
WYZXWK.COM
您的打赏将用于网站日常运行与维护。
帮助我们办好网站，宣传红色文化！
欢迎扫描下方二维码，订阅网刊微信公众号
